In the WPA rules, intentional miscues are unsportsmanlike conduct. I think that most shots that people would call scoop shots are actually miscues.

Patrick Johnson said
Don't use a big word when a singularly unloquacious and
diminutive linguistic expression will satisfactorily accomplish
the contemporary necessity.

Yeah, what he said!

Bob Jewett said:

He shot the jump shot exactly as the definition describes.

Click to expand...

My reading of the WPA jump shot definition does not preclude a scoop shot: with a scoop shot 1) the cue is elevated, and 2) with an elevated cue there is always a component of force in the downward/vertical direction, so you are in fact "driving the cue ball down into the playing surface" to some degree.

David Sorensen said:

Contact TERRY BJOREK IN FACEBOOK , HE HAS A WAREHOUSE OF HUBLER CUE MATERIAL …

Click to expand...

THANKS David!!

Best to you and yours.

Contact TERRY BJOREK IN FACEBOOK , HE HAS A WAREHOUSE OF HUBLER CUE MATERIAL …

But not for sale I do have a Leonard Bludworth the cue on the right side in both pics…

garczar said:

Looks like linen phenolic to me.

Click to expand...

Thx sir

If the first object ball is closer to the end rail, this is a standard three cushion shot on new cloth with clean balls. The cue ball follow acts like draw off that ball because it does not completely die or reverse on the first cushion. You can see something similar with "kick and stick" shots on new cloth, where the cue ball can return to the cushion from a ball two or three balls off the cushion.

The shot in the video requires "help".

AF pool guy said:

I’d guess double sided tape on the rail to turn the side spin into “draw”.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Click to expand...

actually it's a top spin draw.

Sold.

tim913 said:

How tall is Mark Wilson?

Click to expand...

I am 6 6 I think from my memory he is almost as tall as I. 6 4 or 6 5