Double Hit or Not? You Make the Call.
- By MattPoland
- Main Forum
- 101 Replies
I’ll echo what I said in FB. Looks like no foul to me. It appears to obey both tangent lines.
Grady Mathews exhibition included a way to practice single rail kicks. He would place the cueball in the Jaws of the corner and kick it one rail into the side. Starting with a point near the opposite corner and then going up the rail and approaching the opposite side pocket. Kind like the limbo. An interesting study in changing the exit angle by changing the speed and spin.I have on occasion used english to change the angle on a bank,
Not sure why it is more exciting. In a field with this much dead money, I think it just ensures that round one of single elimination will be filled lots of dead money and lots of unwatchable pool.Single elimination from 128 is a good move.
Makes it more exciting.
But day 1 looks pretty boring as all of the top players have been given byes.
we always used the chalk distance and 45 deg. and never had a problem.
Consult with @wrldproI've always liked the idea of having a Tascarella cue. The history with Balabushka, the classic style, very old school.
So I got a quote...nothing fancy, his classic 4 point, 4 veneer with stainless steel joint, a few notched diamond inlays with leather wrap.....$5,250!!!
The questions I have...
1. Is that worth that price or should I find something used?
2. Is it worth the hype? Does it really have a great hit and feel? I know its subjective but I do see a lot for sale.
3. Do you have one that you would never get rid of because you love it so much?
4. If you have ordered a custom from Pete, what aspects of your cue have you loved or not loved?
THANKS IN ADVANCE!
John
Several years ago, I had some pictures from the seller of a Tasc, which I really liked the looks of, but it was bumper-less and the specs were not to my liking. About six months later, I decided to order a Tasc, and I sent Tascarella the pictures of the cue I liked via email, and I asked if I could have that cue built with a 1.29" butt along with a bumper, and whoever I corresponded with blew a gasket. I was told I had to send them a letter with every detail of the cue construction. I'm not a cue maker, and I don't know how to build a cue, I just wanted a cue with a fat butt. I'm not sure why the sharp pictures and the request for a 1.29" butt and a bumper weren't enough detail from a non cue building customer. I was expecting them to say something like, "The pictures will make it easy to know exactly what you want, please send us $X deposit and we'll put you on the list." Because I didn't know what to write in the letter (describe the pictures?), I ended up not ordering a cue from them.
Those are things you understand, but I've known enough players who don't understand and will want to video everything and analyze it.
Do you really think the benefit outweighs the cost? No need to answer, we all know your stance. For me, it doesn't. Sure, maybe I 'catch' a foul that I may have missed otherwise. On the other hand, if I would have missed that it was a foul, was it egregious enough to call? I would rather miss a few fouls than be the guy who mistakenly goes to video even once. Allowing people to further slow down our game is in nobody's best interest.
Why don't you address this issue? You blow it off by saying things like, 'it only takes a quick look at the video', but that 'quick look' will take the same amount of time as it takes me to make three shots (a conservative average, I'm a fast player). Why would you want to promote this without acknowledging the downsides? That is basically the way of all of your content like this, which makes it hard to believe that you were ever an engineer.
That brings memories of the Good Ole Days and playing $5 tournaments every night of the week. One place had 2 different brands of tables with different pockets, rails and cloth and of course one small cueball and the other the oversize ball.How about the rooms that had multiple table types? That always bugged the shit out of me.