So who was voted in as new board members? Johnnyt
Maybe nobody. Is it true that they have no scheduled tournaments for next year?
So who was voted in as new board members? Johnnyt
I feel they really made a huge error by not giving Mr. Griffin the nod here. I can't think of a single person I'd rather have on a board that combines business and billiards together. Well ladies of the WBPA, when you're tired of the same old stuff and would like to see your organization improve by leaps and bounds, I really urge you to consider Mr. Griffin and campaign for his appointment.
I think John Rousseau will do a great job.
I have known Paul Brienza ffor 20+ years - but I did not know he was even running for the position??
Am not familiar with the two women.
Congratulations to the new board members.
But I have heard a 'few rumors' concerning a comment made at the election - perhaps someone could comment? Since I was not there, I would sure hate to speculate.
Mark Griffin
I don't know many of the names nor anyone referred to, but the problem with pool has always been that too many "pool people/lovers" are involved. Pool needs someone OUTSIDE the business who can see it clearly and objectively.
Or maybe the problem is there have been objective outsiders and they don't want to get involved.
The info I got from someone who was at the meeting was that the board read a letter from the APA saying in essence that if Mark Griffin was elected to the board they would pull their sponsorship.
I would like to know if this is true. If it is true and it played a part in the voting then it looks like to me something is just plain rotten.
I have a lot of friends who play on the WPBA and I see all the struggle they go through trying to pursue their dreams of playing on tour. They deserve better than this if the above is true.
If one sponsor can dictate who holds leadership positions by threatening withdrawal of support then that speaks volumes for where the WPBA is at. Honestly it just makes me shake my head.
If someone says "This WPBA business is private". I say BS. The WPBA is non profit organization holding open elections for an unpaid board. If this is the way the APA and WPBA does business then I just think it should be known by everyone. I get the WPBA is on the ropes and desperate for all means of support just to survive but to allow this type of thing to take place sets a terrible precedent.
IMO of course.
The info I got from someone who was at the meeting was that the board read a letter from the APA saying in essence that if Mark Griffin was elected to the board they would pull their sponsorship.
I would like to know if this is true. If it is true and it played a part in the voting then it looks like to me something is just plain rotten.
I have a lot of friends who play on the WPBA and I see all the struggle they go through trying to pursue their dreams of playing on tour. They deserve better than this if the above is true.
If one sponsor can dictate who holds leadership positions by threatening withdrawal of support then that speaks volumes for where the WPBA is at. Honestly it just makes me shake my head.
If someone says "This WPBA business is private". I say BS. The WPBA is non profit organization holding open elections for an unpaid board. If this is the way the APA and WPBA does business then I just think it should be known by everyone. I get the WPBA is on the ropes and desperate for all means of support just to survive but to allow this type of thing to take place sets a terrible precedent.
IMO of course.