actually a perfect game in golf is shooting par. most pro's shoot better than perfect. but a scratch golfer is theoretically able to reach the pro level
but if you want to be realistic 59 is probably as good as it gets and there have been a few.
I think we would see a lot better pool and players if the money was there ....you put a 1m prize package together and I think you would see a lot of great players come out of the woodwork ....
I would like to see earl hit a 320 yard drive ....i'd give him say 100 chances and see what he can come up with. and how the hell does he know if tiger can play pool or not? I bet Tiger could get closer to beating earl in pool than earl could get to tigers golf score ....that's for sure ....
A round of even par is far from perfect in my view, and if you shoot even par every round on tour you probably will not make enough money to keep your card (with the exception of the US Open). Par is the score a scratch golfer would expect to make on a hole. To me a perfect round of golf would be 18 under, essentially hitting every green and one putting. You could even make the case that in today's game, with the par 5's reachable for touring pros, that a perfect round would be 22 under: birdie on all the 3's and 4's and eagles on the four par 5's.
It will likely never happen.
But I don't think it's and absurd question but rather a case could be made that either game is the more difficult.
But I do think maybe the most difficult thing to do in sport is hit a baseball, considering that if you fail 7 out of 10 times you will make the hall of fame.
Last edited: