bye bye ustream.tv, justin.tv & livestream.tv? Can we do it?

Zach I am all for free enterprise, however, I think you could have picked a better way to introduce yourself "bye bye ustream.tv, justin.tv & livestream.tv? Can we do it?" because the title to this thread is out of line.

I'm sorry. I was unaware that I committed an ethics violation with the thread title.

The thread title is certainly fine and suits perfectly the venture we seek to exist and flourish. Obviously you're completely oblivious of the current solution before billiard streamers, and the lack there of. Hence the reasoning why the thread even exists in the first place.

To educate the situation here between you and I. The populous at hand would suggest that a streaming site catered towards billiards would be more beneficial to the billiard community as a whole, than the 3 I had mentioned in the thread title.

So the thread title "bye bye ustream.tv, justin.tv & livestream.tv? Can we do it?", wouldn't be an appropriate thread starter? Really? Seriously? WOW...

You could have just started a thread explaining what you had to offer, and what the benefits of your groups abilities are without making the statements that you choose to use.

I most certainly started the thread explaining what we offer, what we would like to grow into, and asked for opinions about the venture at hand. However, I don't recall the opening thread having any obtrusive or offense statements what-so-ever.

I for one do not care at this point what you have to offer, I don't need anything you have to offer and my limited support doesn't mean anything to you.

Then why are you replying?

But when you come on one of the largest billiards forums around and make the comments you are making there are many who will be offended. If you wanted a loyalty check to see how your comments will effect the market you have succeeded.:cool:

If you say you don't care at this point and you have nothing to offer based on limited support, then why are you handing out ethics lessons? I'm not a child, and I don't need lectured because you think I'm offensive.

Zach.
 
Last edited:
At least I made a comment which offered an opinion based upon this thread. My comments are based upon meeting new idea's, whatever that means but I do not have to agree with statements made. But when some one starts a thread in a negative manner it opens up the thread to negative comments.

I am glad you have become accustom to it, however, I never will be able to. When some one intentionally starts a thread in search of drama on a forum with as many members as this forum has they will find it.

Sorry if you do not understand that.

Could you please be a bit more specific? Please quote statements from the opening thread that has you so certain of it's offensiveness.

Thanks..

Zach.
 
No matter what you do some will tell you not to do it for whatever reason. If you believe in it and are committed take the shot. Its just time and money. You can get more of one and might as well spend both doing something you are passionate about.

That said I do not think you realize just how you are coming across here. The only thing going through my mind is "Imagine what it would be like to work with this guy?"
 
No matter what you do some will tell you not to do it for whatever reason. If you believe in it and are committed take the shot. Its just time and money. You can get more of one and might as well spend both doing something you are passionate about.

That said I do not think you realize just how you are coming across here. The only thing going through my mind is "Imagine what it would be like to work with this guy?"

I emphasize to much on delivery, I admit. I guess the opening thread post was more like a speech than an informative assessment of what we would like to accomplish.

But, I don't back down easily, especially when it comes to things I'm passionate about.

I didn't mean to snap at ya Justin. I apologize for that. Sleep deprivation doesn't help the patience department.

Zach.
 
I emphasize to much on delivery, I admit. I guess the opening thread post was more like a speech than an informative assessment of what we would like to accomplish.

But, I don't back down easily, especially when it comes to things I'm passionate about.

I didn't mean to snap at ya Justin. I apologize for that. Sleep deprivation doesn't help the patience department.

Zach.

No hard feelings on my end. I have heard the hard sell on so many game changing next big things I probably jump a little too hard on them out of reflex. It sounds like you have a smart group of people trying to do something big. I see a lot of holes in whats been revealed so far but that doesn't mean you can't adapt to address things as they present themselves. Hell I do it all the time and I don't even understand English so good.

Maybe you guys can put something together. More power to you. Sooner or later someone has to figure it out.
 
You will have to excuse me as bed time was a few hours ago, so I am somewhat tired.

I will be curious to see where you are able to go with your business plan. I think that most people would agree that the advertising that is done on sites like ustream, justin and livestream can be intrusive on the content of a stream. As Lenny mentioned, a simple adblock will take care of that, but not everyone uses them.

The entire idea of having servers set up just for billiard related streams sounds great. It sounds as though your servers will initially be capable of handling up 1000 viewers-ish. Is that right? I don't see that being a problem for the smaller streamers that aren't doing major events...at least not until you have multiple streams on at the same time. I know that I have had up to 300 viewers on at once and nobody even knows who I am.

Will you be selling advertising overlays on the lower third similar to ustream and the like or will you just be selling ad space on the page? I know that there can be no reward without some risk, but one of the major benefits of using ustream is that I don't have to worry about how many viewers watch a stream, it isn't going to cost me anything. Doing a strictly amateur event the chances of reaching a large audience is pretty limited. What is going to be the break even number per hour?

Let us say that number is 50 viewers. I stream for 8 hours in just one day of an event and only have 300 unique viewers for the day, but my average was 60 viewers at all times because many people watched for several hours. Now, am I 100 viewers short of meeting my break even point and I owe you some $$ or was I 10 viewers over per hour?

I guess a breakdown of what the money flow plan is would be hugely helpful. I understand it is still relatively early and more than likely nothing is set in stone, but that would be a major concern of mine.

There are a ton of questions that I think everyone has and I'm sure that they will all be answered in due time. I like the concept and I won't lie, as of now, I am also of the opinion that it isn't financially feasible. Don't let that get you down though...it wouldn't be the first bad bet that I have made.

I wish you luck in your venture and I will be sure to follow the progress.

On a side note, I realize that you have probably poured your heart and soul into this venture and you feel like it is the greatest thing since sliced bread. I know that questioning and criticism of it can be hard to take and it makes you want to lash back. However, as was mentioned before, the pool community is rather small (as I'm sure you are aware) and sometimes it is better to bite your tongue than to feed into it. Especially when the questions are being asked by one of the very streamers that you pointed to in your first post.
 
I do not understand why most AZ members feel like meeting new ideas with extreme negativity.....

But I have become accustomed to it

I think you are correct, this does happen frequently. But sometimes it isn't the "new idea", but the presentation and delivery of said idea.

Just sayin'. :rolleyes:
 
Thanks for responding in such an eloquent manner to my comments, and sincerely good luck with your endeavorer.

:smile:
 
I don't know anything about the technology currently used in streaming. I can only speak from a consumer's perspective.

Back when Spinks fought Tyson, me and several friends bought the PPV. I've never bought a PPV fight since.

My experience with PPV matches and tournaments are mixed at best. Yesterday's experience with US Open One Pocket PPV, makes me think PPV streams need to get better quickly or run the risk of losing customers.

Just my Opinion.

Steven
 
You will have to excuse me as bed time was a few hours ago, so I am somewhat tired.

Seems like an ongoing saga at AzBilliards, sleep deprivation. :)

I will be curious to see where you are able to go with your business plan. I think that most people would agree that the advertising that is done on sites like ustream, justin and livestream can be intrusive on the content of a stream. As Lenny mentioned, a simple adblock will take care of that, but not everyone uses them.

Ad blockers have come into play because of those intrusive and overwhelming advertisements on the free sites. They've fell into the pot of greed and let their sponsors dictate the business model more so than as respectful consideration to making a buck.

A site that caters towards billiards and technological themed advertising campaigns would not be so intrusive, I wouldn't think. We know the billiard industry contains those with a dose of "high intellectualism" more so than other hobbies. In my years observations, of course. Heck, I think I'm one of them. :)

The entire idea of having servers set up just for billiard related streams sounds great. It sounds as though your servers will initially be capable of handling up 1000 viewers-ish. Is that right? I don't see that being a problem for the smaller streamers that aren't doing major events...at least not until you have multiple streams on at the same time. I know that I have had up to 300 viewers on at once and nobody even knows who I am.

Thanks for sharing your enthusiasm with the idea.

You're right. 1000-ish wouldn't be enough headroom for the larger viewed streams. Even several at the same time for that matter. I guess the balancing act would begin when those situations would arise. There are an abundance of solutions to that problem, which are ready-state. Even if that solution was to "borrow", per se, for an event(s). It's positive for us to know we have taken steps to get "as close to the tree as possible". This is how we've been able to remain idle at minimal cost. It will also enable unlimited possibilities to billiard streamers who use the service. Each and every streamer won't have a "default" layout forcing conformity to a standard. We'll be happy to change and customize it to their benefit, and ultimately the billiard communities benefit. This is something that would not be possible on any free site because of the sheer size and universal conformity.

Will you be selling advertising overlays on the lower third similar to ustream and the like or will you just be selling ad space on the page? I know that there can be no reward without some risk, but one of the major benefits of using ustream is that I don't have to worry about how many viewers watch a stream, it isn't going to cost me anything. Doing a strictly amateur event the chances of reaching a large audience is pretty limited. What is going to be the break even number per hour?

This is a very touchy subject for everyone involved. Since we will be mainly dealing with a particular market, in our case 'anything billiards' and 'anything technology', the creativity in which the content is dispersed among the OnSitePool.com network will be a daunting task. Let alone the task of compensation.

To reach a goal where any billiard streamer can stream in High Definition without a shred of worry will have to rely on the concession of like minds and a vote. I would like to use this thread to iron out those details. We know for certain it's not going to be as successful and beneficial on just our opinion and ideas. We do not want to create a streaming service where ultimately we have the say on how things are done. (within reason) We want the input from everyone with a vested interest, with an open mind, without negativity.

As the thread progresses, I'm sure many will pony up suggestions for consideration.

Let us say that number is 50 viewers. I stream for 8 hours in just one day of an event and only have 300 unique viewers for the day, but my average was 60 viewers at all times because many people watched for several hours. Now, am I 100 viewers short of meeting my break even point and I owe you some $$ or was I 10 viewers over per hour?

We'll use 8 hours, 60 viewers average, uplink speed of 1.2k, for bandwidth consumption. All are approximate and will be less than calculated.

These are prices from AudioVideoWeb.com an may not reflect special promotions or deals.

This will consume 250GB of bandwidth in HD 720P Approx $300.00
This will consume 145GB of bandwidth in SD Approx $175.00

Based on a performance, sponsor, and advertising structure agreed by the like minds of the current billiard streamers, that stream would cost you nothing with OnSitePool.com. We can't say the actual cost of the stream because it will fluctuate based on bids received by sponsors/advertisers, plus on the flip side if any compensation to the streamer would be awarded.

If you really get down and look at the principal, you are supporting the billiard community by producing the stream. You are also creating a potential for new viewers by promoting your stream in your area. Hence the reason why we need a dedicated billiard streaming service to entice, organize, and consolidate billiard streamers. It would be in the best interest of the billiard community as a whole.

We will break bandwidth consumption down further and continually add features to the streamers control panel which will aide the streamers ability to take necessary steps to increase revenue and performance.

I guess a breakdown of what the money flow plan is would be hugely helpful. I understand it is still relatively early and more than likely nothing is set in stone, but that would be a major concern of mine.

There are a ton of questions that I think everyone has and I'm sure that they will all be answered in due time. I like the concept and I won't lie, as of now, I am also of the opinion that it isn't financially feasible. Don't let that get you down though...it wouldn't be the first bad bet that I have made.

I wish you luck in your venture and I will be sure to follow the progress.

Yes. These details will be available in due time. But you should be able to get the gist of the principal.

On a side note, I realize that you have probably poured your heart and soul into this venture and you feel like it is the greatest thing since sliced bread. I know that questioning and criticism of it can be hard to take and it makes you want to lash back. However, as was mentioned before, the pool community is rather small (as I'm sure you are aware) and sometimes it is better to bite your tongue than to feed into it. Especially when the questions are being asked by one of the very streamers that you pointed to in your first post.

I understand your concern, as do I. But I've bit my tongue for many years and have given everyone I've met the benefit of all doubts. I still do to this day.

I dish out exactly what is dished in, and if you look at all my replies in this thread, they are in the up most context of professionalism. I don't get belligerent and sinister. I state the facts to the best of my ability with equal criticism received.

A sincere thanks to you! Your post was enjoyable to respond to.

Truly Yours,

Zach.
 
Last edited:
I don't know anything about the technology currently used in streaming. I can only speak from a consumer's perspective.

We want to hear your perspective in great detail. Because ultimately without viewers this wouldn't exist. As without pool players AzBilliards wouldn't exist either.

Back when Spinks fought Tyson, me and several friends bought the PPV. I've never bought a PPV fight since.

I just went to friends house who had a de-scrambler. :) No Ad-Blocker needed either.

My experience with PPV matches and tournaments are mixed at best. Yesterday's experience with US Open One Pocket PPV, makes me think PPV streams need to get better quickly or run the risk of losing customers.

Just my Opinion.

Steven

Marty, from today's Herman University Show on Ustream hits the nail on the head. It was actually spawned from this thread. Marty has one of the most open minded views on current events surrounding the billiard industry.

http://www.ustream.tv/recorded/22558432 "SCROLL TO 49 minutes"

Thank you very much for your support!

Zach.
 
Last edited:
I'm kind of curious as to the average number of viewers that actually pay to watch these streams and
would guess bigger names would skew that number higher. Last one I watched had terrible quality.

Interesting thread.
picture.php
 
Marty, from today's Herman University Show on Ustream hits the nail on the head. It was actually spawned from this thread. Marty has one of the most open minded views on current events surrounding the billiard industry

Wow! You just lost all credibility with me, with that little nugget of wisdom.

Anyone that associates themselves with him, after what he has said and wrote to people, tells me everything I would need to know, as far as doing any business with them.

In plain English (which is non-existant here) it would be NONE.

Everybody else on what is AZB:
"A pool forum"

You on the same question:
It is a hyperlink on the world wide web consisting of hypertext markup language written to form a software package natively titled vbulletin, where the general populace congregate to form a entity that discuss billiard related topics.
 
Last edited:
I'm kind of curious as to the average number of viewers that actually pay to watch these streams and
would guess bigger names would skew that number higher. Last one I watched had terrible quality.

Interesting thread.

Marty from the Herman University Show on Ustream ( http://www.ustream.tv/user/cosmo8 ), and I quote.

"Although pay-per-view streams are a great learning tool for any of the pro players, and I think they should have accessibility without having to pay. It's a professional courteously thing in my opinion. But on the same side their missing out alot, because it's pay-per-view. You won't get 5 professional people paying into a pay-per-view for this event thats going on right now. You won't get 5 professional pool players at any time, in a chat, or in a chat on pay-per-view would be like 0. And how that can be ignored is beyond belief. That's telling you, that the most people that are passionate about it, the people that have spent the most time with it,--and this is what were selling to sponsors? The players can't watch it, can't converse, can't give anything back, or give any opinions what-so-ever in the direction it needs to go in. Players are like kept in a cellar with a cap on top, with the promoters and sponsors standing on top of it. It's really funny.

Thanks Dartman. We appreciate your support..

Zach.
 
Last edited:
We want to hear your perspective in great detail. Because ultimately without viewers this wouldn't exist. As without pool players AzBilliards wouldn't exist either.



I just went to friends house who had a de-scrambler. :) No Ad-Blocker needed either.



Marty, from today's Herman University Show on Ustream hits the nail on the head. It was actually spawned from this thread. Marty has one of the most open minded views on current events surrounding the billiard industry.

http://www.ustream.tv/recorded/22558432 "SCROLL TO 49 minutes"

Thank you very much for your support!

Zach.

Well, that Marty guy is a nut or he's stoned when he streams. Either way, stop listening to him, friend.
 
I don't know anything about the technology currently used in streaming. I can only speak from a consumer's perspective.

Back when Spinks fought Tyson, me and several friends bought the PPV. I've never bought a PPV fight since.

My experience with PPV matches and tournaments are mixed at best. Yesterday's experience with US Open One Pocket PPV, makes me think PPV streams need to get better quickly or run the risk of losing customers.

Just my Opinion.

Steven

In the interests of improving the product...what did you not like about the stream ?
 
Back
Top