But the break is what separates th eboys from the girls and thats mostly all about power.
anyone who thinks the break is all about power doesn't know how to break.
the break is about accuracy and control..
it is generally accepted that Shane has the best break in the business.. I've met Shane in person. he's not all that big and of all the adjectives I could use to describe him "Powerful" isn't on the list.
The problem with steroids in professional sports is that they are illegal, not that they have possible long-lasting detrimental side effects.
The whole ballyhoo over “illegal” performance enhancing drugs is simply a red herring which diverts attention away from the “legal” performance enhancing drugs which have been used since the late 60’s in most modern sports generating high-dollars.
World records wouldn’t be falling at every world meet if it weren’t for the “legal” performance enhancing drugs we can casually group together as “pain-killers and anti-inflamatories”. Back in the 60’s and throughout the 70’s painkillers were routinely administered by coaching staffs in many professional sports activities including, and most noticeably, in American football.
Today, of course, these legal performance enhancing drugs are widely and routinely administered by team “physicians” to keep the players in many sports on the field or in the pools or on the rings to perform at near super-human levels and that’s because they wouldn’t be performing at these levels without those legal drugs. These legal drugs account for far more of the advances in performance overall than any “illegal” steroid could ever account for.
The references and examples of modern legal performance enhancing drugs would probably take many thousands of pages to exhaustively document.
If pool in the U.S. were generating the monies of baseball, football, or even soccer in this country, both steroids and legal performance enhancing drugs would most certainly be in use. If someone of the caliber of SVB were to trip and fall, severely spraining his ankle before the U.S. Open, today he might have to sit that one out. If pool was generating millions in television revenue, he would be brought to the tour physician and pain issue would be taken care of until after the Open was finished, if at all possible. But, of course, it wouldn’t be looked at as an unfair advantage because it is today totally “legal”.
Illegalize the use of painkillers and anti-inflammatory drugs and see how many records would be broken in the near future in any sport. On any given American football weekend there are players risking their lives and health by using these “legal” drugs to entertain us, but people still point to miniscule side-effects of steroids as a reason to demonize them.
One of the most unique features of billiards in general is that these “legal” performance enhancing drugs haven’t infiltrated the competitive arena of the sport. We’re seeing one of the few major world sports in which plain human capacity and endurance is still the norm.
Enjoy it while you can.
I understand that they make your "pee-pee" shrink. Too big a price. IMO.
J.
ALMOST rite,your balls will shrink,once you start putting all that extra test in your body,your balls will shrink because they stop making their own test when your body is getting it else where(through a syringe,synthiect test)!
im talking athletes who want to be the best, work hard and use chemicals right.
The skill set in pool is more finesse and not raw power. Steroids will not help your pool game, in fact I would bet it would hurt it more than anything.
...
So you say "But the break is what separates th eboys from the girls and thats mostly all about power."
What about straight pool or one pocket? Are girls good enough for you then?
I would be interested to hear from the women on this board. Clownfish says you are inferior to men because you can't break hard. Personally I disagree, I think women can break hard and further more I don't think that power is what determines a good break.
Maybe you can get through to him, I can't seem to make a dent!
You should talk to Ken Caminiti about this. Oh wait... you can't. He's dead from a drug overdose. But I'm sure he thought he was using chemicals right...
At this point, I think you're a troll. If a person was seriously considering this, he wouldn't broadcast it on the Internet. Also, all of your "women can't break as hard as men and that's the difference" and "who is this shane person" BS reeks of extra-strength troll.
Swallow that pill called hard work and it will be much more rewarding.
Hey ClownFish, tell us a joke!
cdryden, i was really trying to ignore you, because you're taking everything and turning it upside down, trying to turn a peaceful steroid discussion into me being a sexist. but apparently you wont go away.
im sure a man naturally having more physical power can also get more draw or follow, inside or outside english on a cue ball as well as break harder then a woman. everyone can hit a ball soft, stronger people physically have more range, and a greater amount of tools. but you refuse to say anything in rebutal to this, and only answer well hit all your shots hard. and go play a woman pro. I never said hit all your shots hard. and i never said i was near pro level myself. i don't have to lose to a woman pro, I can also lose to a regular woman player, i'm not that good yet.
pay attention, the point is constant practice and training is the most important element. but all this being equal, i think performance enhancing drugs elevate someones skillset.
now in regards to your male vs woman argument in pro level competitive sport as i have stated from the beginnig. put a woman in a nfl or nhl or nba uniform, or start putting them in mens brackets in tennis, golf, or friggin POOL. all these sports require a great deal of finese, touch, strategy the difference is speed and power.
who historicall has held all the speed and power records?? i'd say men over woman, this isn't sexist this is fact. and in the past 20-30 years and probably even longer people that have used performance enhancing chemicals have broken almost all the records.
Why do i get the feeling that you and Thaiger are one and the same? You both start a controversial post and then try to spin it like it wasn't your intention. Any rational person who reads this thread from beginning to end would draw the same conclusion that you are being sexist.