All I stated was that the economics between the costs and the revenue of the BCAPL make sense or you would not be doing it.
It costs alot to build a skyscraper, but companies that build skyscrapers for hundreds of millions of dollars still do it and they still make a profit regardless of that cost, or they would not be doing it.
I am sure the BCAPL is not in the money losing business, I have too much respect for your business sense to think you lose your shirt on .
The event is run exceptionally smoothly, and gets better every year. There will always be people who try to "cheat the system". Some will be caught...some won't.
Scott Lee
www.poolknowledge.com
Do you have any realization about business? These statements show me you don't. You make it sound like all businesses are full proof. Build it and they will come only happens in The Field of Dreams.
Are you implying the Taiwanese players cheated?
What about those statements make you feel that way? Businesses that lose money tend to fold, the BCAPL shows no sign of folding thus it would seem likely that it is not a money losing venture. You disagree with this statement? I would question your own business acumen if that is the case.
Of course some businesses fail, and those businesses go bankrupt and cease to exist. Ask Curt Schilling how his company 38 Studios is doing atm, that is what happens to companies that lose money.
No, just a comment from someone that doesn't know the WHOLE story. Just as many others making suppositions about what they THINK happened.
The Taiwanese people got the raw end of this deal. The BCAPL dropped the ball and now are trying squirm out of it by offering a ridiculous settlement to them to cover up for their errors. Errors that they were presented with before this whole ordeal happened.
All I can say to this, is that if you feel that Mark is doing a undesirable job at what he is doing....make him an reasonable offer for his company...maybe he will abide you and sell.
Then you can run it the way you think may be beneficial to all.![]()
(snip) Squirm out of it?
How?
By explaining the situation in public and being transparent about the the whole deal?
Great way to try and slide under the radar there.
Squirm out of it?
How?
By explaining the situation in public and being transparent about the the whole deal?
Great way to try and slide under the radar there.
For the life of me I do not understand why anyone has anything to do with leagues. From playing in them to running them. It seems everyone involved is pissed off about something.
If they play good and win they get pissed when they are moved up.
If they play bad and lose they are pissed because someone played better and wasn't moved up before they played them.
If you do play good and get moved up but are not pissed about it...you wait a year and find out lo and behold when there are only a fraction of the entries in higher divisions the prize fund is much lower so you get really pissed.
If you run a league and can not accurately handicap every human being on the planet sight unseen everyone gets pissed.
If you run a league and make an error then do your best to fix it people are pissed.
If you try to slow roll your way into a tournament to snap it off everyone is pissed. If you do snap it off and get caught then you are pissed.
Makes my head hurt thinking about the whole thing. For the life of me I will never understand why Mark or anyone else fools with it at all.
Just some random thoughts brought on by raging insomnia. My solution is dont pay out any money at all. Trophies. Think trophies. What could go wrong?
...........Trophies are nothing but dust collectors. ..........
The notifications and checks have all been sent by email and/or US mail.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
2012 BCAPL National Championships Player Disqualifications
The following is an outline of the background and final disposition regarding the disqualification of two players from the 8-Ball Men’s Open Singles division of the 2012 BCAPL National Championships: Wayne Huang and Sean Cheng.
Both players attended the championships from their native country, Taiwan. The primary reason for the disqualifications was a miscommunication between the League Operator for the two players and the CueSports International (CSI) office. Much of the miscommunication was due to the language barrier.
In the 2011 championships, players from Taiwan were required to play in the Advanced Singles division. However, through a series of miscommunications between the League Operator and CSI, a few new players from Taiwan were allowed to enter the Open Singles division of the 2012 championships.
The Tournament Qualification Committee determined that Wayne Huang and Sean Cheng did not belong in the Open Singles division, and disqualification of their finishing positions was required.
CSI felt some responsibility in the miscommunications with the League Operator in Taiwan, and recognized that the disqualified players had incurred significant expenses in traveling from Taiwan. That, plus the realization that the two disqualified players spoke no English and may not have been personally culpable in being placed in the wrong division, caused the Tournament Qualification Committee to reimburse $5,500 of the disqualified players’ expenses.
The 1st and 2nd place prize money was $11,000 and $7,000. 30% was reimbursed to the players to cover expenses. That leaves $12,500 to be distributed on a pro rata basis to the other players on the finals board who were defeated by the disqualified players. Checks for the amounts below were distributed in addition to prize money already won.
The records will not show a 1st or 2nd place finisher for 2012. Advancing the other players in a double elimination format breaks down very quickly: 5th-6th cannot be advanced to 3rd-4th, 9th-12th cannot be advanced to 7th-8th, 17th-24th cannot be advanced to 13th-16th, etc.
CSI regrets that disqualifications were required, but recognizes that the integrity of the Open division must be protected.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Respectfully,
Mark Griffin, CEO
CSI - BCAPL - USAPL
Jwilliams,
I believe every league has the ability (maybe even the responsibility) of trying to keep people in the proper divisions, even if that means in the middle of an event,
Obviously, someone has to win every event. That does not mean they should not be in that event. Only when the facts dictate moving someone will we take what we perceive to be drastic steps.
As in this case, all the money will always be paid out. That needs to be very clear. This time we reimbursed some of the expenses because they had spent a considerable amount, and we felt that we were partially responsible for the situation. The majority of the responsibility is with the league operator and players.
The language barrier caused this situation to be very unique.
We did not set a policy of covering part of a teams expenses or of paying them 30%. That is just what we felt was appropriate IN THIS SITUATION.
I hope I answered your question - and it was not taken to be bashing or giving anyone a hard time. Any more questions on this should be directed to our office at 702-719-7665.
Mark Griffin
And yet another that doesn't have all the facts.
Yes. Because you know more about what happened than I do.
That has to be what it is. Not like I was actually there during the whole deal. No way I would know what was happening.
I wanted to wait until I saw the official letter from Mark concerning the situation before posting and asking questions. Maybe it was answered previously and, if so, I apologize.
Why were they the players not disqualified earlier?
Why did CSI choose to do something about it this year?
The reason I ask is because I remember there being a similiar situation a few years back where the Portugese team had an unfair advantage as they didn't have to create teams from just one league but were able to create all-star teams based on the entire country. (If I remember correctly they finished 1st in teams, first in men's singles, and finished highly in several other events as well.) There was no disqualifications given even with numerous complaints filed. So why are the taiwanese being singled out?
Why you hate Asians Mark? :grin: