BCA Open team from TAIWAN disqualified?

Mark,

I'm pretty sure the silent majority would agree with your decision.

Time to move forward and focus on a bigger and better Rio turney next year;
 
All I stated was that the economics between the costs and the revenue of the BCAPL make sense or you would not be doing it.

It costs alot to build a skyscraper, but companies that build skyscrapers for hundreds of millions of dollars still do it and they still make a profit regardless of that cost, or they would not be doing it.

I am sure the BCAPL is not in the money losing business, I have too much respect for your business sense to think you lose your shirt on .

Do you have any realization about business? These statements show me you don't. You make it sound like all businesses are full proof. Build it and they will come only happens in The Field of Dreams.
 
That sure is some decision....pretty cool for the other guys in those relative spots that luckily had to play those dudes. It's goofy you got guys finishing in the same places making totally different amounts of money with these new disbursements.

I only go to party anyway so I really don't care for the record, it's just a chance to see people I rarely see for me. Kind of makes me glad I prioritize in the order I do though, I'd prob be a little angry if I actually went to play pool seriously and did good just to finish the same place as someone and see them get a bonus $800 cause of who they were beat by.
 
Do you have any realization about business? These statements show me you don't. You make it sound like all businesses are full proof. Build it and they will come only happens in The Field of Dreams.

What about those statements make you feel that way? Businesses that lose money tend to fold, the BCAPL shows no sign of folding thus it would seem likely that it is not a money losing venture. You disagree with this statement? I would question your own business acumen if that is the case.

Of course some businesses fail, and those businesses go bankrupt and cease to exist. Ask Curt Schilling how his company 38 Studios is doing atm, that is what happens to companies that lose money.
 
Last edited:
Are you implying the Taiwanese players cheated?

No, just a comment from someone that doesn't know the WHOLE story. Just as many others making suppositions about what they THINK happened.

The Taiwanese people got the raw end of this deal. The BCAPL dropped the ball and now are trying squirm out of it by offering a ridiculous settlement to them to cover up for their errors. Errors that they were presented with before this whole ordeal happened.
 
What about those statements make you feel that way? Businesses that lose money tend to fold, the BCAPL shows no sign of folding thus it would seem likely that it is not a money losing venture. You disagree with this statement? I would question your own business acumen if that is the case.

Of course some businesses fail, and those businesses go bankrupt and cease to exist. Ask Curt Schilling how his company 38 Studios is doing atm, that is what happens to companies that lose money.

All I can say to this, is that if you feel that Mark is doing a undesirable job at what he is doing....make him an reasonable offer for his company...maybe he will abide you and sell.

Then you can run it the way you think may be beneficial to all. ;)
 
Glad to hear there is a final resolution and information posted.

I see two looming issues:

- if an open player has one great tourney and destroys the field does that player run the risk of being dq'd after the fact and not paid in full?

- with the miscommunication, should those Taiwan players have been in the Advanced divsion? Looks like they could have pocketed $7,200 for a 1/2 finish which surely is possible based on reports of ability. Isn't that an opportunity cost that is not taken into account??
 
No, just a comment from someone that doesn't know the WHOLE story. Just as many others making suppositions about what they THINK happened.

The Taiwanese people got the raw end of this deal. The BCAPL dropped the ball and now are trying squirm out of it by offering a ridiculous settlement to them to cover up for their errors. Errors that they were presented with before this whole ordeal happened.

Squirm out of it?

How?

By explaining the situation in public and being transparent about the the whole deal?

Great way to try and slide under the radar there.

For the life of me I do not understand why anyone has anything to do with leagues. From playing in them to running them. It seems everyone involved is pissed off about something.

If they play good and win they get pissed when they are moved up.

If they play bad and lose they are pissed because someone played better and wasn't moved up before they played them.

If you do play good and get moved up but are not pissed about it...you wait a year and find out lo and behold when there are only a fraction of the entries in higher divisions the prize fund is much lower so you get really pissed.

If you run a league and can not accurately handicap every human being on the planet sight unseen everyone gets pissed.

If you run a league and make an error then do your best to fix it people are pissed.

If you try to slow roll your way into a tournament to snap it off everyone is pissed. If you do snap it off and get caught then you are pissed.

Makes my head hurt thinking about the whole thing. For the life of me I will never understand why Mark or anyone else fools with it at all.

Just some random thoughts brought on by raging insomnia. My solution is dont pay out any money at all. Trophies. Think trophies. What could go wrong?
 
If you believe strongly in your ideas, another option is to organize your own nationals tournament in las vegas.

FWIW, last year I helped a friend run a friendly neighborhood 10-ball tournament. We had some of our own ideas such as a fairer handicap, and we implemented it to attract the broadest base of players. I measured our success by player loyalty, if they liked what we did then they came the following week.

All I can say to this, is that if you feel that Mark is doing a undesirable job at what he is doing....make him an reasonable offer for his company...maybe he will abide you and sell.

Then you can run it the way you think may be beneficial to all. ;)
 
Last edited:
(snip) Squirm out of it?

How?

By explaining the situation in public and being transparent about the the whole deal?

Great way to try and slide under the radar there.

And yet another that doesn't have all the facts.
 
Squirm out of it?

How?

By explaining the situation in public and being transparent about the the whole deal?

Great way to try and slide under the radar there.

For the life of me I do not understand why anyone has anything to do with leagues. From playing in them to running them. It seems everyone involved is pissed off about something.

If they play good and win they get pissed when they are moved up.

If they play bad and lose they are pissed because someone played better and wasn't moved up before they played them.

If you do play good and get moved up but are not pissed about it...you wait a year and find out lo and behold when there are only a fraction of the entries in higher divisions the prize fund is much lower so you get really pissed.

If you run a league and can not accurately handicap every human being on the planet sight unseen everyone gets pissed.

If you run a league and make an error then do your best to fix it people are pissed.

If you try to slow roll your way into a tournament to snap it off everyone is pissed. If you do snap it off and get caught then you are pissed.

Makes my head hurt thinking about the whole thing. For the life of me I will never understand why Mark or anyone else fools with it at all.

Just some random thoughts brought on by raging insomnia. My solution is dont pay out any money at all. Trophies. Think trophies. What could go wrong?

You nailed it except for the trophies. Trophies are nothing but dust collectors. Try taking one to the grocery store and see what you can get.
 
The notifications and checks have all been sent by email and/or US mail.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
2012 BCAPL National Championships Player Disqualifications

The following is an outline of the background and final disposition regarding the disqualification of two players from the 8-Ball Men’s Open Singles division of the 2012 BCAPL National Championships: Wayne Huang and Sean Cheng.

Both players attended the championships from their native country, Taiwan. The primary reason for the disqualifications was a miscommunication between the League Operator for the two players and the CueSports International (CSI) office. Much of the miscommunication was due to the language barrier.

In the 2011 championships, players from Taiwan were required to play in the Advanced Singles division. However, through a series of miscommunications between the League Operator and CSI, a few new players from Taiwan were allowed to enter the Open Singles division of the 2012 championships.

The Tournament Qualification Committee determined that Wayne Huang and Sean Cheng did not belong in the Open Singles division, and disqualification of their finishing positions was required.

CSI felt some responsibility in the miscommunications with the League Operator in Taiwan, and recognized that the disqualified players had incurred significant expenses in traveling from Taiwan. That, plus the realization that the two disqualified players spoke no English and may not have been personally culpable in being placed in the wrong division, caused the Tournament Qualification Committee to reimburse $5,500 of the disqualified players’ expenses.

The 1st and 2nd place prize money was $11,000 and $7,000. 30% was reimbursed to the players to cover expenses. That leaves $12,500 to be distributed on a pro rata basis to the other players on the finals board who were defeated by the disqualified players. Checks for the amounts below were distributed in addition to prize money already won.


The records will not show a 1st or 2nd place finisher for 2012. Advancing the other players in a double elimination format breaks down very quickly: 5th-6th cannot be advanced to 3rd-4th, 9th-12th cannot be advanced to 7th-8th, 17th-24th cannot be advanced to 13th-16th, etc.

CSI regrets that disqualifications were required, but recognizes that the integrity of the Open division must be protected.

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Respectfully,

Mark Griffin, CEO
CSI - BCAPL - USAPL

I think this was the most fair decision that could have been made regarding the situation. Like it was said earlier, i have a feeling the silent majority agrees with your decision. Can't please everyone, oh well.

Mark, you guys do a helluva job considering what it takes to have an event of this size. Your efforts are commendable, and I for one can't wait to see how the event shapes up at the Rio next year :thumbup:
 
Thank you for the clarification Mark!

While I can't say that I fully agree with the decision, I do appreciate your taking the time to address it here.

I would also like to state that at no time did it ever occur to me that the BCAPL would just pocket the extra money and if I intimated that in anyway, then I do apologize.

Thanks again for all you've done for pool, I've no doubt it's a thankless job.


Jwilliams,

I believe every league has the ability (maybe even the responsibility) of trying to keep people in the proper divisions, even if that means in the middle of an event,

Obviously, someone has to win every event. That does not mean they should not be in that event. Only when the facts dictate moving someone will we take what we perceive to be drastic steps.

As in this case, all the money will always be paid out. That needs to be very clear. This time we reimbursed some of the expenses because they had spent a considerable amount, and we felt that we were partially responsible for the situation. The majority of the responsibility is with the league operator and players.

The language barrier caused this situation to be very unique.

We did not set a policy of covering part of a teams expenses or of paying them 30%. That is just what we felt was appropriate IN THIS SITUATION.

I hope I answered your question - and it was not taken to be bashing or giving anyone a hard time. Any more questions on this should be directed to our office at 702-719-7665.

Mark Griffin
 
And yet another that doesn't have all the facts.

Yes. Because you know more about what happened than I do.

That has to be what it is. Not like I was actually there during the whole deal. No way I would know what was happening.
 
Yes. Because you know more about what happened than I do.

That has to be what it is. Not like I was actually there during the whole deal. No way I would know what was happening.

Now you understand. ;)

May 31, 2011? Funny I didn't see your name mentioned.
 
Last edited:
I wanted to wait until I saw the official letter from Mark concerning the situation before posting and asking questions. Maybe it was answered previously and, if so, I apologize.

Why were they the players not disqualified earlier?

Why did CSI choose to do something about it this year?

The reason I ask is because I remember there being a similiar situation a few years back where the Portugese team had an unfair advantage as they didn't have to create teams from just one league but were able to create all-star teams based on the entire country. (If I remember correctly they finished 1st in teams, first in men's singles, and finished highly in several other events as well.) There was no disqualifications given even with numerous complaints filed. So why are the taiwanese being singled out?

Why you hate Asians Mark? :grin:
 
:shocked:Hey Jay,

The two Taiwain players did not get any complaints filed with the Tournament Director desk. (Remember, someone has to win).

We did something about it this year because we felt there was a problem we needed to correct. This was probably based on some of the things that had happened in previous years. We try to learn and improve.

A few years ago the Portugese team did get us. But I believe they won Master Team - which is where they belong. We had a liason that 'did not' report accurately the true situation in Portugal leagues. We did correct the criteria they would have to compete by.

We did not single out the Taiwainese - but I think we made the correct decision.

I did not realize I hated Asians :shocked: I will make sure my wife knows that! LOL :thumbup:

Mark Griffin

I wanted to wait until I saw the official letter from Mark concerning the situation before posting and asking questions. Maybe it was answered previously and, if so, I apologize.

Why were they the players not disqualified earlier?

Why did CSI choose to do something about it this year?

The reason I ask is because I remember there being a similiar situation a few years back where the Portugese team had an unfair advantage as they didn't have to create teams from just one league but were able to create all-star teams based on the entire country. (If I remember correctly they finished 1st in teams, first in men's singles, and finished highly in several other events as well.) There was no disqualifications given even with numerous complaints filed. So why are the taiwanese being singled out?

Why you hate Asians Mark? :grin:
 
Back
Top