I have read most of this thread.
I here what Jay is talking about.
Jay does talk to Greg a lot - I don't talk to either one that often because I am trying to put on the world's largest pool tournament. 330+ tables this year.
But we have all talked a little.
My only problem with BB is their schedule. I just don't think they have thought through the 'costs' they have incurred by NOT working with the established events.
They have been delayed close to 8 months - yet they are concerned over 3-4 weeks of down time. I think that is penny wise and pound foolish.
The good will they would have garnered would have been worth it. IMHO.
I do understand their argument about players being able to decide which events to play in - and that teams now have 2 alternates. But if my team was in contention for first place, would I allow a team member to go play in an unrelated event? NO - I would not want him to do that.
So as this BB season goes on, the dynamics change drastically. And the alternates 'may' not have the realistic chance to do well in a US Open event or similar event - so they don't play either (since they are not 'in' Vegas).
I know this is all conjecture - BUT the issue is that if the pro players do not support the existing pro events, they will not continue. That is how it works.
And I think this is what Jay is saying. The pro players should make damn certain that BB is going to be around for several years before they 'throw the baby out with the bathwater' - because (for me) I can do a LOT better just promoting amateur events - and maybe having 6-8 (invited) pro player on sight. I do the PRO events for the Pros and the enjoyment of the amateurs.
I see what is happening to the pro scene and it makes me sick. You have the players promoting $7,000 events that were $20,000+ added events. The expenses are eating up the pro players. That is why we put on 3 events in 9 days.
But if it is not appreciated, we will change our direction. It is not what we want to do - it is the law of economics. (which is also why I don't believe BB will be around in a couple of years. No business can continue loosing large amounts for an extended period of time. I don't care how much money the investors have, it is doesn't make financial sense, it will go away.)
I believe Bonus Ball should have the right to succeed or to fail.
But I do not believe the players should give BB the right to possibly cause total disruption of the status quo - based on an unproven plan.
This is no different that an individual quitting a stable job because he is offered a position in an new business. If the business succeeeds, he could do better than he was in the old job. But if the new job goes away, he might end up unemployed.
The grass always looks greener on the other side of the fence!
If anyone wishes to discuss my thoughts, contact me at
markg@playcsipool.com
Mark Griffin