I grew up around farmers. Not much different than owning live stock.
If it breathes, eats and shits, it will eventually end up costing you money.
If it breathes, eats and shits, it will eventually end up costing you money.
@ CLEARY - please correct me if i'm smoking CRACK, but -
- isn't Jason Shaw sponsored by Str8Shots? and under Contract/"äpproval"?
You can write off all expenses which would outweigh the cashes unless you are a top 3 player.
This could make financial sense if the backer limits his investment to local open/pro tournaments. Shallower fields mean that Shaw has a better chance of snapping it off and the expenses would be limited to entry and gas.
Once you add in airfare/hotel and a deep, major tournament level field, the purses just aren't big enough for a backer to make money on this.
Still has to pay self employment tax. On his last years winnings he would have paid around $6300.00.
That is assuming he even filed taxes.
The problem with pool is, there is no money in the periphery. To make money you can't depend on tournament winnings. Take your friend Keith for example. He actually has the name to possibly make a few bucks outside of the game but as a result of playing the game. Take this example.Isn't he from Scotland?
With social media networking available to anyone, Jayson Shaw may be able to seek a remedy to funding. Coming on AzBilliards, IMHO, even though it worked for John Schmidt, isn't a good thing. James Walden, et al., comes to mind, and I like James very much, but because of what occurred on this forum, I would be very reluctant to contribute.
I used to enjoy helping others in the pool world, but Iike some, I'm disgusted with how some have utilized this forum as a resource to party.
Money ain't going to fall out of the sky for anybody. I don't care who you are. As far as action goes, most action today is made by an appointment. Backers and stakehorses can be arranged per event, beforehand, rather than an commitment for future funding.
There are avenues for players like Jayson to avail themselves. The only thing needed is time and effort to find the best one for him. AzBilliards ain't that resource.
There is one of the problems, the backer is either a partner or he isn't. I am sure in a local tournament with pretty much no expenses other then a small entry fee the player will want to pay himself and keep everything he wins. He only wants the backer when it is to his advantage. In other words, he wants a backer when the bet is bad.
Isn't he from Scotland?
With social media networking available to anyone, Jayson Shaw may be able to seek a remedy to funding. Coming on AzBilliards, IMHO, even though it worked for John Schmidt, isn't a good thing. James Walden, et al., comes to mind, and I like James very much, but because of what occurred on this forum, I would be very reluctant to contribute.
I used to enjoy helping others in the pool world, but Iike some, I'm disgusted with how some have utilized this forum as a resource to party.
Money ain't going to fall out of the sky for anybody. I don't care who you are. As far as action goes, most action today is made by an appointment. Backers and stakehorses can be arranged per event, beforehand, rather than an commitment for future funding.
There are avenues for players like Jayson to avail themselves. The only thing needed is time and effort to find the best one for him. AzBilliards ain't that resource.
The problem with pool is, there is no money in the periphery. To make money you can't depend on tournament winnings. Take your friend Keith for example. He actually has the name to possibly make a few bucks outside of the game but as a result of playing the game. Take this example.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gRWh8NGw51o
I can easily see a commercial like this but with a pool theme. In fact, like with the old Miller Lite ad pool has some good visuals that would interest advertisers if pitched right. If I was someone like Keith I would have an agent and give it a shot. There is no telling where something can lead.
@ CLEARY - please correct me if i'm smoking CRACK, but -
- isn't Jason Shaw sponsored by Str8Shots? and under Contract/"äpproval"?
He was indeed sponsored by Str8 Shots, meaning they were responsible for his entry entry fees, transport etc....
Not any more. Interesting story no less
He was indeed sponsored by Str8 Shots, meaning they were responsible for his entry entry fees, transport etc....
Not any more. Interesting story no less
I'd like to hear that story.
@ CLEARY - please correct me if i'm smoking CRACK, but -
- isn't Jason Shaw sponsored by Str8Shots? and under Contract/"äpproval"?
He was indeed sponsored by Str8 Shots, meaning they were responsible for his entry entry fees, transport etc....
Not any more. Interesting story no less
Str8 Shots said:;4630195]I'd like to hear it too!