I've hit two 'bushkas in my life and neither one played as well as the Richard Black or T. Scruggs i had.
What exactly does "I've hit two 'bushkas in my life" mean? I'm not disagreeing with anything, just trying to clarify.
I've hit two 'bushkas in my life and neither one played as well as the Richard Black or T. Scruggs i had.
What exactly does "I've hit two 'bushkas in my life" mean? I'm not disagreeing with anything, just trying to clarify.
Never owned a 'buska but do have some table-time with two of them. They played fine but i will never get the 'buska-mania about them. To be fair, most steel-joint 4pt. cues made by quality builders don't differ much. At least that's been my experience and i've owned a bunch. The R.Black i got in '82(really wish i'd kept this one) cost 375bux with two shafts and a Fellini. It probably played the best, for me anyway, of any steel joint cue. Same cue now, i just check'd, is 1800bux with one shaft. Oh well.What exactly does "I've hit two 'bushkas in my life" mean? I'm not disagreeing with anything, just trying to clarify.
Are you high? Some of your posts make absolutely no sense. I usually like your skewed sense of humor but you don't have be on point 24/7.Hit with two bubba-ba-loo-skers, I'd say
You'd be surprised just how much OLD wood some of the current makers have on hand. They make the hoarders on cable look normal.I’d like to see more responses that reflect the OP’s questions. With pictures preferably.
While I’ve never hit with a Balabushka one thing that people should realize is the quality of the wood was likely to be of much better than what is available today. Finding old growth wood is very difficult these days.
Glues are better today, sure but then again the older cues have stood the test of time. Cues with these newer superior glues haven’t been around long enough to prove that longevity.
Elvis didn’t write his own songs. Does that make him any less of an artist?
I have recently been looking at some Balabushka cues, most of which are fairly plain. I have also seen some monsters. I love Mizerak's, Wimpy's, etc. I know about the Golden Balabushka and Steve R's almost new one that still had the paper that George put on one of the shafts. I know that I have a picture somewhere that had Irving Crane's.
What would you think were the fanciest five or ten that George ever made? I would imagine that there are a few in private collections (Glenn Family, Mark K., etc.) that would be cool to see and I know there are collectors in the Orient that probably have some nice ones.
Let's hear some of your ideas and see some pics of what you think are the fancy ones!
To say you can't use a Bushka for todays game is a moronic statement of epic proportions. Its balls, and a table, that hasn't changed. There are people today that use Bushkas, Blacks, Szams, etc.. they are all not much different. If you believe that someone blindfolded cannot tell the difference between brands of cues, then you must also believe that those same cues would be adequate to play with today.
As far as fancy for George. It did not take much. Remove the golden Balabushka from the equation and then you have rings, and inlays. Fancy to George in 1965-1974 is cookie cutter today. But if you look around there are 1000s of cues made each year, based on Georges inlay patterns, and techniques by REPUTABLE cuemakers.
As far as this glues and adhesives nonsense. Please show me a Balabushka that exploded on impact.. Titlists.. still used today with no "glue" modifications, Burton Spains still used today, points aren't falling out, Gus Szamboti.. same.. The glue argument is so stale, if that is what you have to stoop to, to try and prove todays cues are better, you need a new argument.
JV
To say you can't use a Bushka for todays game is a moronic statement of epic proportions. Its balls, and a table, that hasn't changed. There are people today that use Bushkas, Blacks, Szams, etc.. they are all not much different. If you believe that someone blindfolded cannot tell the difference between brands of cues, then you must also believe that those same cues would be adequate to play with today.
As far as fancy for George. It did not take much. Remove the golden Balabushka from the equation and then you have rings, and inlays. Fancy to George in 1965-1974 is cookie cutter today. But if you look around there are 1000s of cues made each year, based on Georges inlay patterns, and techniques by REPUTABLE cuemakers.
As far as this glues and adhesives nonsense. Please show me a Balabushka that exploded on impact.. Titlists.. still used today with no "glue" modifications, Burton Spains still used today, points aren't falling out, Gus Szamboti.. same.. The glue argument is so stale, if that is what you have to stoop to, to try and prove todays cues are better, you need a new argument.
JV
Since this is a pretty lively thread, here's a picture from the Billiard Encyclopedia, no doubt everyone has seen it, but it's deserving in this thread of high end Bushkas. A couple of the top ten may be there, who knows...
All the best,
WW