Top Ten Fanciest Balabushkas?

I've hit two 'bushkas in my life and neither one played as well as the Richard Black or T. Scruggs i had.

What exactly does "I've hit two 'bushkas in my life" mean? I'm not disagreeing with anything, just trying to clarify.
 
I had a 1958 Corvette with a removable hardtop

I got it second hand for about $1500
I thought it was beautiful but I didn't really enjoy driving it, it
was uncomfortable when you hit bumps

I had a few Gorge Balabushka Cues when he was alive
I and about 40 or so since then,i like them,I even played with
an Ivory jointed one , piloted ivory joint

As far as I can tell,the Tascarella cues of these days play
the same. Like Whites and Motteys,Scruggs and Cochran,
Balabushkas and Tascarellas

I am expecting two cues from Bob Owen that have
acrylic and mother of pearl inlays to look almost like a Balabushka.


I suspect that I have gone as far from these designs as anyone, at times.I
am playing with a Drexler with Mighty Mouse on it, My buddy Jack is playing
with the Drexler "Wylie Coyote and Road Runner " There is no doubt in my mind
that Drexler is making better cues in several ways,there have been improvements
in the glues,designs and techniques but Balabushkas are still great playing
cues, Look at the recent trend back to full splice cues

But sometime this week when my Balabushka look alike gets here
I will be thrilled by the Bob Owen too.

I
 
Last edited:
What exactly does "I've hit two 'bushkas in my life" mean? I'm not disagreeing with anything, just trying to clarify.
Never owned a 'buska but do have some table-time with two of them. They played fine but i will never get the 'buska-mania about them. To be fair, most steel-joint 4pt. cues made by quality builders don't differ much. At least that's been my experience and i've owned a bunch. The R.Black i got in '82(really wish i'd kept this one) cost 375bux with two shafts and a Fellini. It probably played the best, for me anyway, of any steel joint cue. Same cue now, i just check'd, is 1800bux with one shaft. Oh well.
 
I’d like to see more responses that reflect the OP’s questions. With pictures preferably.

While I’ve never hit with a Balabushka one thing that people should realize is the quality of the wood was likely to be of much better than what is available today. Finding old growth wood is very difficult these days.

Glues are better today, sure but then again the older cues have stood the test of time. Cues with these newer superior glues haven’t been around long enough to prove that longevity.

Elvis didn’t write his own songs. Does that make him any less of an artist?
 
I’d like to see more responses that reflect the OP’s questions. With pictures preferably.

While I’ve never hit with a Balabushka one thing that people should realize is the quality of the wood was likely to be of much better than what is available today. Finding old growth wood is very difficult these days.

Glues are better today, sure but then again the older cues have stood the test of time. Cues with these newer superior glues haven’t been around long enough to prove that longevity.

Elvis didn’t write his own songs. Does that make him any less of an artist?
You'd be surprised just how much OLD wood some of the current makers have on hand. They make the hoarders on cable look normal. ;)
 
I have recently been looking at some Balabushka cues, most of which are fairly plain. I have also seen some monsters. I love Mizerak's, Wimpy's, etc. I know about the Golden Balabushka and Steve R's almost new one that still had the paper that George put on one of the shafts. I know that I have a picture somewhere that had Irving Crane's.

What would you think were the fanciest five or ten that George ever made? I would imagine that there are a few in private collections (Glenn Family, Mark K., etc.) that would be cool to see and I know there are collectors in the Orient that probably have some nice ones.

Let's hear some of your ideas and see some pics of what you think are the fancy ones!

I wasn't aware there was a picture of Irving Crane's Balabushka. I'd like to see that.
 
Einstein improved on Newton's theory but still for its time Newton's theory was a major breakthrough.
 
To say you can't use a Bushka for todays game is a moronic statement of epic proportions. Its balls, and a table, that hasn't changed. There are people today that use Bushkas, Blacks, Szams, etc.. they are all not much different. If you believe that someone blindfolded cannot tell the difference between brands of cues, then you must also believe that those same cues would be adequate to play with today.

As far as fancy for George. It did not take much. Remove the golden Balabushka from the equation and then you have rings, and inlays. Fancy to George in 1965-1974 is cookie cutter today. But if you look around there are 1000s of cues made each year, based on Georges inlay patterns, and techniques by REPUTABLE cuemakers.

As far as this glues and adhesives nonsense. Please show me a Balabushka that exploded on impact.. Titlists.. still used today with no "glue" modifications, Burton Spains still used today, points aren't falling out, Gus Szamboti.. same.. The glue argument is so stale, if that is what you have to stoop to, to try and prove todays cues are better, you need a new argument.


JV
 

Attachments

  • 1.jpg
    1.jpg
    82.1 KB · Views: 538
  • 3.jpg
    3.jpg
    81 KB · Views: 521
  • butt_hi.jpg
    butt_hi.jpg
    35.5 KB · Views: 530
  • fore_hi.jpg
    fore_hi.jpg
    146.4 KB · Views: 520
To say you can't use a Bushka for todays game is a moronic statement of epic proportions. Its balls, and a table, that hasn't changed. There are people today that use Bushkas, Blacks, Szams, etc.. they are all not much different. If you believe that someone blindfolded cannot tell the difference between brands of cues, then you must also believe that those same cues would be adequate to play with today.

As far as fancy for George. It did not take much. Remove the golden Balabushka from the equation and then you have rings, and inlays. Fancy to George in 1965-1974 is cookie cutter today. But if you look around there are 1000s of cues made each year, based on Georges inlay patterns, and techniques by REPUTABLE cuemakers.

As far as this glues and adhesives nonsense. Please show me a Balabushka that exploded on impact.. Titlists.. still used today with no "glue" modifications, Burton Spains still used today, points aren't falling out, Gus Szamboti.. same.. The glue argument is so stale, if that is what you have to stoop to, to try and prove todays cues are better, you need a new argument.


JV

Thanks for being the voice of reason on a thread that quickly went sideways. One thing that has never changed in the pool world is that it's full of "knockers!" These are usually people that have never accomplished anything more than trying to tear someone else down.

P.S. I owned and PLAYED with two Bushkas in my life. George made cues for pool players not collectors, and he made good playing cues, and that's what we were all looking for. When I was playing with them they were not valued that highly, maybe a couple of hundred bucks. Their value was in the quality of the hit and how it transferred to it's user. They were highly coveted cues by the best players of that era.
 
Last edited:
To say you can't use a Bushka for todays game is a moronic statement of epic proportions. Its balls, and a table, that hasn't changed. There are people today that use Bushkas, Blacks, Szams, etc.. they are all not much different. If you believe that someone blindfolded cannot tell the difference between brands of cues, then you must also believe that those same cues would be adequate to play with today.

As far as fancy for George. It did not take much. Remove the golden Balabushka from the equation and then you have rings, and inlays. Fancy to George in 1965-1974 is cookie cutter today. But if you look around there are 1000s of cues made each year, based on Georges inlay patterns, and techniques by REPUTABLE cuemakers.

As far as this glues and adhesives nonsense. Please show me a Balabushka that exploded on impact.. Titlists.. still used today with no "glue" modifications, Burton Spains still used today, points aren't falling out, Gus Szamboti.. same.. The glue argument is so stale, if that is what you have to stoop to, to try and prove todays cues are better, you need a new argument.


JV

Finally, an intelligent, well written post.
Thank you.

Josh
 
I'll add a few more that were recently for sale....

Even those top makers at todays proverbial round table strive to "assemble" as well as George.
 

Attachments

  • image.jpeg
    image.jpeg
    127.5 KB · Views: 574
Here's two nicely designed Bushkas that I have; both very strong playing cues, btw. :)
 

Attachments

  • Bushka-Green-buttsleeve.jpg
    Bushka-Green-buttsleeve.jpg
    115.5 KB · Views: 558
  • Bushka-Green-full.jpg
    Bushka-Green-full.jpg
    87.2 KB · Views: 558
  • Bushka-Glitter-full.jpg
    Bushka-Glitter-full.jpg
    196.6 KB · Views: 565
  • Bushka-Glitter-bushka-ring2.jpg
    Bushka-Glitter-bushka-ring2.jpg
    97.5 KB · Views: 554
  • Bushka-Glitter-buttsleeve.jpg
    Bushka-Glitter-buttsleeve.jpg
    190 KB · Views: 569
Last edited:
THAT LAST ONE IS ONE OF THE VERY NICEST ONES I EVER SAW

turn to the Cue Gallery

Bob Owen TRIBUTE CUE FOR DEAN

to see another one
 
Knocker tell us what you play with so we may be educated. You seem to like low more than high points.
 
Top Ten Fanciest Balabushkas?
 

Attachments

  • IMG_1143_new-1200x1600.jpg
    IMG_1143_new-1200x1600.jpg
    185.8 KB · Views: 529
Since this is a pretty lively thread, here's a picture from the Billiard Encyclopedia, no doubt everyone has seen it, but it's deserving in this thread of high end Bushkas. A couple of the top ten may be there, who knows...

All the best,
WW
 

Attachments

  • BE Bushkas - Copy.jpg
    BE Bushkas - Copy.jpg
    84.2 KB · Views: 522
Thanks to everyone that posted pics! This is what I was asking about, not some troll's grudge against a legend of cue making. Even though George made a lot of plainer cues, it's nice to see some of his best work. Congrats to the owners, too!

Anymore big ones out there?
 
Since this is a pretty lively thread, here's a picture from the Billiard Encyclopedia, no doubt everyone has seen it, but it's deserving in this thread of high end Bushkas. A couple of the top ten may be there, who knows...

All the best,
WW

And now some may understand why Szambotis are often taken for Balabushkas.
 
Back
Top