★★ Scott Frost Challenges All Of Arizona & SVB ★★ $10,000

Chris,

If SVB plays Scott even up in Phoenix, there could be some HEAVY action on that match.
 
So if you put a poster like that out and you decide when and where you play, you decide what game to play and you decide what table you play on, does that really make you the best player in the last 15 years? So he would of beat Efren 10 or 15 years ago at any thing? I don't gamble, but if Shane showed up I would make an exception. Go beat Shane in a long three discipline 1 pocket, 8 ball and 10 ball match on a neutral table. That would make the poster more believable. Play with your own money so you have more fun.
 
  • Like
Reactions: mia
Last 7 DCC 1-Pkt. events (2014, ..., 2008):

Frost -- 3rd, 15th, 32nd, 5th, 1st, 2nd, 9th

Van Boening -- 8th, 3rd, 1st, 1st, (not in the money) , 16th, 9th

this means nothing. DCC is a short race. A long one hole race or an ahead set is a completely different.

If Scott`s head is in the right place 8-7 or even will be a great match with Shane no matter what table they play on.
 
Their records look to be pretty even, overall.

Roger

Exactly :) That is why only NITS say, oh, so and so will beat so and so every day of the week. Well, Earl was the best 9ball player on the planet at one time... but he did NOT win every match or tourney he entered. And the nits say it like there could be no other outcome... that SVB could NOT lose... really, two top pro's, and one can not lose.... how naïve. I guess my dad can really beat up their dad :)

How could anyone not like this. He's a having a little fun, he's giving anyone that wants it some action, including SVB, but then the knockers gotta do what they do best....
 
last time he played Alex was at Hardtimes. I was there. Alex torched him 8 ahead in about 8 hours, on a tight gold crown.


Spanky..how much of that was a result of wardrobe choice:eek:, and Alex' sessions with SVB that preceded. Scott never looked comfortable, and started playing increasingly loose, trying to get back into the match. It wasn't an example of Scott's best game that night.

If it happens, I'm a viewer. On paper...a good match.
 
I would enjoy watching this.

IMO, there was a time where Scott was the favorite. I don't think that now.

While I don't like SVB shot choices, I would give him a slight edge.

Im not a fan of the "Power One Pocket" either. I prefer the "Chicago Style" of squeezing him to death like boa....:eek:

Ken
 
I would enjoy watching this.

IMO, there was a time where Scott was the favorite. I don't think that now.

While I don't like SVB shot choices, I would give him a slight edge.

Im not a fan of the "Power One Pocket" either. I prefer the "Chicago Style" of squeezing him to death like boa....:eek:

Ken

doesn't Ike Runnels play out of chi-town... I don't think he got the memo, he 2 and 3 rails balls in from all over!
 
Spanky..how much of that was a result of wardrobe choice:eek:, and Alex' sessions with SVB that preceded. Scott never looked comfortable, and started playing increasingly loose, trying to get back into the match. It wasn't an example of Scott's best game that night.

If it happens, I'm a viewer. On paper...a good match.

It was not Scott`s best choice of clothing. Alex playing SVB I am sure helped a but. But, Scott picked table 6 because Alex played SVB on table 1. It was just a classic butt whoopin. Alex played great and put it on Scott. I think Scott was over confident coming into that match. He told me how much money they brought and was acting like they where going to make a big score. After he got smashed so fast he didn`t even think about playing another set.
When Scott i right he is very dangerous and fun to watch. I still want to see a ling race between Scott and Efren before it`s to late.
 
I'm laughing at everyone that keeps saying Shane won't win at this...I'll bet my bank account @ 9-7 or 8-7. Probably even, too.

I hope they play. This would have been a good TAR match.

In the action room, Shane would be the favorite at even odds. Anybody who would want to be on Scott would easily get it covered. I don't know if Shane will, or should, play Scott on his own equipment. Whenever you play somebody at home, you're giving them weight.
 
Last edited:
If you're willing to play SVB without a spot, then you might as well
forget the driver's licenses and make it open for anyone on the planet.

Hope he gets some nibbles.
 
*you're*

......

I agree, if you're going to make a poster, proof read the damn thing.

Like shooting the runner do yea ... It's a copy and paste/quote -> go to the source ... and bring about 10K.

The spelling police has more work to do too .... and not just on "The Freezer's" posts either. Hit 'em all up.
Screen Shot 2014-04-11 at 9.34.11 AM.jpg
 
Last edited:
Ike needs WAY more than 8-7, WAY MORE.

I wasn't suggesting that Ike play Scott, it was in reference to "chicago style one pocket"... "squeeze him like a boa"

Ike is the biggest one pocket name in Chicago that I KNOW... any his style is anything but that.
 
Exactly :) That is why only NITS say, oh, so and so will beat so and so every day of the week. Well, Earl was the best 9ball player on the planet at one time... but he did NOT win every match or tourney he entered. And the nits say it like there could be no other outcome... that SVB could NOT lose... really, two top pro's, and one can not lose.... how naïve. I guess my dad can really beat up their dad :)

How could anyone not like this. He's a having a little fun, he's giving anyone that wants it some action, including SVB, but then the knockers gotta do what they do best....

One, tourneys and gambling are two completely different things. Two, Shane plays better than some care to think, yes, even playing one pocket.
 
Back
Top