I don't know Eddie Wheat either but I would like to hit a few balls with one of his cues. I also don't think a "name" makes a cue play good. There are some well known current cuemakers whose cues I don't happen to like. I just don't believe in knocking their cues, because it is obvious that other people do like them, and will pay high prices for them.
And there is a relatively unknown cuemaker named Chuck Starkey who I think makes a damn good hitting cue, one of the best. I happen to like the way most Szambotis play, but hey that's just me. And Bushkas too have a hit I like. I wish I would never have sold mine years ago.
I was a little offended when Mr. Wheat said he thought Szambotis "hit like shit". I think the way a cue plays is very subjective, and to knock another man's work is a little out of line. Especially one so revered in the same industry. There is something called respect. I guess if I had my choice between a Wheat cue and a Szamboti, I would chose the Szam. Enough said.
And there is a relatively unknown cuemaker named Chuck Starkey who I think makes a damn good hitting cue, one of the best. I happen to like the way most Szambotis play, but hey that's just me. And Bushkas too have a hit I like. I wish I would never have sold mine years ago.
I was a little offended when Mr. Wheat said he thought Szambotis "hit like shit". I think the way a cue plays is very subjective, and to knock another man's work is a little out of line. Especially one so revered in the same industry. There is something called respect. I guess if I had my choice between a Wheat cue and a Szamboti, I would chose the Szam. Enough said.