When I said that Evan should verify who put the fake points on the cue, and when, I was talking about him authenticating whether or not he did it (I'm sure he didn't), and if he did, when--because that is all that really matters here. Reading my posts with just a bit of common sense would have told you that. It was extremely clear in several posts what I was getting at, and why.alstl said:You have no idea what you are talking about. Anybody could have sharpied those points, how in the hell wold Evan know who did it? I've dealt with Evan personally and he is a class act.
Now you people are going to go after one of the great cues made in this country? You need to give yourself some red rep for that.
jasonlaus said:That's the only reason for ANY points.
FAST_N_LOOSE said:NOT TRUE AT ALL. SPLICED POINTS, AND THE WOODS USED CERTAINLY MAKE A DIFFERENCE IN HIT. AND FULLSPLICE AND SHORT SPLICE ALSO HAVE DIFFERENT FEELS.
A MAPLE ON MAPLE CUE, WILL HIT AND BALANCE DIFFERENT THAN A MAPLE NOSED EBONY POINTED CUE, AND A EBONY NOSED MAPLE POINTED CUE FEELS TOTALLY DIFFERENT THAN EITHER OF THE OTHER TWO CUES.
ALSO DEPTH OF THE SPLICES, WIDTHS OF THE SPLICES, AND ANGLE OF THE POCKET CUTS WILL CHANGE THE SPLINE, AND STRENGTH OF A CUE, WHICH INDIRECTLY CHANGES THE HIT/FEEL OF A CUE.
rigmaster said:Thanks fast and loose I'm glad this will be over I'm on his ignore list and he's on my list not to ever buy or sell to or from list ! Good work Ron
breakshot said:FYI -on engineering and physics of a pool cue.
if a cue maker knifes-in or does full splice points, with a heavy wood like cocobola or ebony then there is a much more gradual progression of weight in the cue as you go farther back in the cue, which is adventageous when you are bringing the cue through the ball. because the cue acts like one mass, instead of several jointed masses, each trying to catch the other.
FAST_N_LOOSE said:I Just Spoke With Larry, And He Has Agreed To Allow Me To Get The Cue In Hand And Examine It. Ship The Cue To Me, I Will Inspect It, And We'll Go From There.
I Truly Feel That Larry Didn't Do Anything Dishonest Here. I Can Also Understand Why He Took Offense To My Initial Post, I Would Have Taken Offense As Well From His End. I Wasn't Telling Anyone What To Do, Just Giving An Option To Make This Go Away.
Let's Move Forward, And Get This Resolved.
P.s. If The Points Don't Have Issues, I'll Be Sending The Cue Back To You.
Suaro said:Is Iowa Player related to Eddie Wheat ?![]()
He's missed the point (<-no pun intended) serveral times here.
He should investigate the cue on his own dime and time. and give the buyers money back (in full). Doesn't matter who says its an R2 (authentic or not). Buyer not happy....
Evan is talking about full splice cues, not CNC pointed cues. I highly doubt that he is ok with CNC pointed cues that have been faked to look like full splice sharp points. Why is it so hard for you to grasp that he is talking about something different than what you are? Call him back and ask him about it directly if you don't believe me, but you are going to have to be more specific with him to avoid confusing yourself even more.iowa_player said:You say the point are altered Evan says that it is natural for the tips of points to fade and be touched up in the refinish he said this to me on the phone .
You have some that say that it is common on full splice cues. You have none, not one single one, that say that it is acceptable on CNC pointed cues to fake them with a marker to make them look like sharp full splice cues. Again, why is this such a difficult concept?iowa_player said:I have many that have said that is commonly done . Do I need to go through and point out the posts that say that ?
PM him back and ask him if the R2 cues ever originally came from the factory with CNC points that were faked with a marker to look like sharp full splice points. If the answer is no, then you sold a misrepresented cue (and owe a full refund and ALL shipping) that somebody has modified and drew on with a damn marker! What's next, are you going to start offering crayola crayon cues too?!iowa_player said:I got a pm this morning from a very well known cue maker saying it is indeed an R2.
You will finally be doing a good service if you stand by this statement.iowa_player said:I do not wish to ever sell another cue here...
FAST_N_LOOSE said:ENOUGH IS ENOUGH.
I'LL HAVE THE CUE IN A FEW DAYS, IT WILL GET RESOLVED. NO REASON TO CONTINUE TO SAY ALL THE SAME CRAP.
THIS ISN'T DIRECTED AT ONE PARTY, IT'S DIRECTED AT EVERYBODY.
CHILL OUT FOR A FEW DAYS, I'LL POST WHEN THE CUE GETS HERE, AND I GET TO LOOK AT IT.
IF I WAS IN LARRYS SHOES, I WOULDN'T DO A REFUND WITHOUT THE CUE IN HAND, OR WITH SOMEONE I KNOW/TRUST.
BOGEY SHOULD ALSO BE HERE, WHEN THE CUE GETS HERE, SO I'LL HAVE ANOTHER SET OF TRAINED EYES TO LOOK AT THE CUE.
jasonlaus said:What we can't have anymore fun?:grin:
Poolplaya9 said:When I said that Evan should verify who put the fake points on the cue, and when, I was talking about him authenticating whether or not he did it (I'm sure he didn't), and if he did, when--because that is all that really matters here. Reading my posts with just a bit of common sense would have told you that. It was extremely clear in several posts what I was getting at, and why.
FAST_N_LOOSE said:I Just Spoke With Larry, And He Has Agreed To Allow Me To Get The Cue In Hand And Examine It. Ship The Cue To Me, I Will Inspect It, And We'll Go From There.
I Truly Feel That Larry Didn't Do Anything Dishonest Here. I Can Also Understand Why He Took Offense To My Initial Post, I Would Have Taken Offense As Well From His End. I Wasn't Telling Anyone What To Do, Just Giving An Option To Make This Go Away.
Let's Move Forward, And Get This Resolved.
P.s. If The Points Don't Have Issues, I'll Be Sending The Cue Back To You.
Dude, if you consider this fun I can't imagine how you are when you're lonely..jasonlaus said:What we can't have anymore fun?:grin: