You can't turn out hundreds of cues a day with the same standards as turning out a few a week or less.
Hu
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=adUbpn7WZYA&feature=related
Be easy, trigger.
Tell that to Buddy Hall or Earl Strickland or any other champion in the late 70s - 80s.
Josh
That's a good question. It probably has a lot to do with the same reason that at one time to get an example of proper playability, one had to get a handmade because the technology and machinery to achieve consistency via mass production means wasn't there at the time. This applies to cues, musical instruments, firearms etcetera. The simpler the construction, the easier it is for technology in mass production to achieve a consistent result. Here's an example. 50 years ago it was uncommon if not impossible to buy a mass produced rifle that could shoot 1/2" groupings at 100 yards. You had to get a custom. Today, you can buy an off the shelf rifle that will do that. One that is mass produced. Why? Because the machinery that machines parts is better today. More accurate.
How complex is a shaft in comparison to a violin or a firearm? No where near as complex. As a result, it's easier for engineers to use modern machinery to produce a consistent product of a high quality.
But it all depends on what you consider to be a baseline for adequate performance.
With musical instruments it's about the sound. This can be tested, and is tested with electronic equipment (check out the tests done to see if the sound of a Stradivarius is really that much better, the best ears in the music world couldn't tell the difference in a blind test) With firearms, it's the accuracy or reliability. Also can be put to the test, quite easily. With cues, it's subjective...
Unless of course we put a cue into a mechanical device that swings it the same way every time to see if the production cue hits the cue ball straight every time vs. a custom cue. Or if one imparts more spin than the other. People have done this test.
The custom doesn't hit straighter or put more spin.
Consider this angle, since you want to bring up what the Pro's use. Today, do the all Pro's use custom cues? They don't. Most don't.
Had some custom cue maker built a cue that truly performed better - would there not be a mad rush by the professional pool playing world to buy those cues? Think about it. These are people who make their money playing pool, whether it be gambling or tournaments. They want to gain ANY edge they can possibly get - and they will pay for that edge even if it's expensive. They would be at the forefront to seeking out enhanced performance cues.
The production guys would also want to get their hands on the custom cue with better performance. So that they could dissect it and reverse engineer it. To copy it and then offer it. The industry would be ALL over it wanting a piece of that pie. That performance gain would have to be due to something, and that cue maker would then have something they could actually take to a PATENT office. But do they? They don't. They have a maple shaft with a ferrule made of one of a dozen common materials used in cues. Nothing special.
But that isn't the case. None of that is happening.
I think it is telling that the amateur world is far more convinced about the superior performance of custom cues than is the professional pool playing world. Odd that the bangers would know that a cue plays better more so than most Pros.
In Mosconi's days it was different. If you wanted a decent cue, you had to get a custom. Today is different.
Unfortunately, you cannot prove that the custom made shaft:
1. Hits balls straighter (than a quality production)
2. Imparts more spin on CB (than a quality production)
3. Plays more consistent. (than a quality production)
Why did I chose that criteria? Because these are things players typically consider to be desirable qualities.
I'm not trying to offend you, I'm just trying to get down to the meat of the matter. This is apparently a taboo subject for many here.
I will agree that a custom cue can be made more durable. No doubt about it. I seen crappy production cue inlays that pop, swell, crack etcetera. I seen poor quality butts or assembly of butts.
Of course, I'm talking about quality production cues - not garbage. But even then, yes the custom is still made better and more durable because of the tolerance of the various components of the cue and how they are fitted to one another. I understand this completely. But the quality production cue is durable enough. This has to do with the question, how much is enough? I don't pry tree stumps out of the ground with my cue. And if it had that ability due to superior durability, that wouldn't help me or my game one bit whatsoever.
A cue needs to be strong enough to survive normal playing conditions for years and years. That's it as far as durability.
Most productions dont even roll straight on the rail right out the box, roll it on the flat bed and it looks great, roll it on the rail and the tips drawing circles in thin air.
I don't own a custom cue (just wanted to get that out of the way). I feel that what makes a custom cue play better to someone vs a production cue was the custom cue was designed to the specs they asked for (balance point, butt weight, shaft weight etc) so it feels more comfortable to them. It's all about feel! So to say a custom cue is no better then a production cue is sorta miss-leading because it may be better to the person who had it designed to exactly what they wanted, but your right that there is no magic or technology that makes them play better. I've seen guys walk in off the street and run rack after rack in straight pool with a crooked house cue. I see custom cues as better quality wise (custom specs, exotic woods, better cuts/grain of wood, exotic wraps, custom pin sizes, balance points, shaft dia, tapper size etc etc) I've done some woodworking before and it's a beautiful thing to see a finished product from a master craftsman.
I am an APA SL4, if I play with my $500 OB cue or a $3,000 Scruggs I'm making the same amount of balls. I'd LOVE to own the Scruggs, but I can't afford it so I am happy with my OB cue. Bottom line is there are some great production cues and some great custom cues and it all comes down to what you prefer to shoot with.
I buy purely on playability alone. And that includes the two Southwests I've owned, a Joss, Scruggs, Murray Tucker, Andy Gilbert, Gulyassy, Dishaw, and any I may have left out.
OK.. Bola.. I'll bite...
Just explain to me one thing...
From 1962 ish through the 70's into the 80's.. guys like Balsis, Crane, Hopkins, Mizerak, Murphy, Lassiter, Moore, Mosconi, Cranefield, Martin on and on and on.. could have been playing with Palmers, Vikings, Adam cues, Rich, etc.. etc.. but they all chose Balabushka, Szamboti, Ginacue, Rambow etc...
Now I will agree that there probably is a ceiling to how much $$$$ is really necessary to spend on playability. After that it's just what that person decides he can afford.
JV (---come see me in Valley Forge.. the ususal booth...
OK, then explain to me what is it that the good cue makers are doing in the materials and construction of their cues that makes them play and perform better than a production cue?
Whatever it is that is allegedly creating this superior playability must be recognizable and quantifiable in either methods or materials. Otherwise, we're talking superstition here.
Chris,you get big kudo's from me on this. With all the beauty of our legendary cuemakers being respected,the Billiards Industry is constantly being Innovated. Why shouldn't we benefit from the expanses in technology. We witnessed it with the pantograph,CNC,Laser,and others being developed. It is for our benefit that they do this. "Only Change is Permanent."plagairized from somebody,I'm not that smart!!:embarrassed2:A custom cue is about pride of ownership and craftsmanship. Playability can be found almost anywhere now. And why shouldn't it be? Production cues are copies of cues that were developed by custom makers and just mass produced.
What I see is the greatest advances in innovation will not be coming from custom cue makers but from the aftermarket. Since the popularity of the Predator, OB and Tiger shafts has taken hold, many custom cues are now serving as a fancy handle for aftermarket shafts, and this is not just marketing.
I predict the next wave of high tech shafts, ferrules, and tips is coming and they will be considerably better than the first generation. My prediction is they will combine all of the best traits of conventional shafts with the playing characteristics of LD shafts and will be very consistent, and eventually the improved hit will be embraced by some custom makers as well.
Chris