Custom Cue Mythology

I will have to say, as far as playability goes, I prefer my Trogdon over any production cue I've ever played.

That may be because it has been fine tuned to my specs for my own taste and comfort. That's something a production cue could never do for me.
 
Man Vs Machine

You can't turn out hundreds of cues a day with the same standards as turning out a few a week or less.

Hu

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=adUbpn7WZYA&feature=related

I am not gonna argue about the who makes a better cue kinda thing cause I have already been there. However, I must say I don't agree with this last statement. The way I understand manufacturing is that there is a whole economy around choosing the appropriate machine on your production line. Set the price of the cue, decide the overhead you can carry while selling these cues to make a profit, and buy your machines. End the end, the tolerances these machines are capable of reaching seems to be the result of how much one is willing to spend on the machine itself.

I posit that a factory that is not worried about profit, could make the tightest tolerance cue any one has ever seen. And make them over and over again. I also think that when it comes to consistency, a machine has a human beat 6 days out of seven. IMO...

Chris
 
Be easy, trigger.

Tell that to Buddy Hall or Earl Strickland or any other champion in the late 70s - 80s.

Josh

Give a pool player a regular salary and they will play with anything. And the truth is the 'best' can beat most with a house cue. It takes an even competitor for a cue to make a difference.
 
That's a good question. It probably has a lot to do with the same reason that at one time to get an example of proper playability, one had to get a handmade because the technology and machinery to achieve consistency via mass production means wasn't there at the time. This applies to cues, musical instruments, firearms etcetera. The simpler the construction, the easier it is for technology in mass production to achieve a consistent result. Here's an example. 50 years ago it was uncommon if not impossible to buy a mass produced rifle that could shoot 1/2" groupings at 100 yards. You had to get a custom. Today, you can buy an off the shelf rifle that will do that. One that is mass produced. Why? Because the machinery that machines parts is better today. More accurate.

How complex is a shaft in comparison to a violin or a firearm? No where near as complex. As a result, it's easier for engineers to use modern machinery to produce a consistent product of a high quality.

But it all depends on what you consider to be a baseline for adequate performance.

With musical instruments it's about the sound. This can be tested, and is tested with electronic equipment (check out the tests done to see if the sound of a Stradivarius is really that much better, the best ears in the music world couldn't tell the difference in a blind test) With firearms, it's the accuracy or reliability. Also can be put to the test, quite easily. With cues, it's subjective...

Unless of course we put a cue into a mechanical device that swings it the same way every time to see if the production cue hits the cue ball straight every time vs. a custom cue. Or if one imparts more spin than the other. People have done this test.

The custom doesn't hit straighter or put more spin.


Consider this angle, since you want to bring up what the Pro's use. Today, do the all Pro's use custom cues? They don't. Most don't.


Had some custom cue maker built a cue that truly performed better - would there not be a mad rush by the professional pool playing world to buy those cues? Think about it. These are people who make their money playing pool, whether it be gambling or tournaments. They want to gain ANY edge they can possibly get - and they will pay for that edge even if it's expensive. They would be at the forefront to seeking out enhanced performance cues.

The production guys would also want to get their hands on the custom cue with better performance. So that they could dissect it and reverse engineer it. To copy it and then offer it. The industry would be ALL over it wanting a piece of that pie. That performance gain would have to be due to something, and that cue maker would then have something they could actually take to a PATENT office. But do they? They don't. They have a maple shaft with a ferrule made of one of a dozen common materials used in cues. Nothing special.

But that isn't the case. None of that is happening.


I think it is telling that the amateur world is far more convinced about the superior performance of custom cues than is the professional pool playing world. Odd that the bangers would know that a cue plays better more so than most Pros.


In Mosconi's days it was different. If you wanted a decent cue, you had to get a custom. Today is different.

Here is where we'll disagree. As a bit of a historian, and knowing what Brunswick was making at the turn of the century, I'll go out on a limb, piss a few people off and say that I think there were BETTER cue craftsman then. At least in the mass production level. There are guys today that on their best day wouldn't attempt to build a 360, or a marquetry cue by HAND. Back then didn't have Unique Products, CNC, Bobcad or Monkeycam.. they sighted by eye and if half of them had steady rests they were probably lucky.

JV (----Monkeycam is a joke BTW :D
 
simple things

Unfortunately, you cannot prove that the custom made shaft:

1. Hits balls straighter (than a quality production)

2. Imparts more spin on CB (than a quality production)

3. Plays more consistent. (than a quality production)

Why did I chose that criteria? Because these are things players typically consider to be desirable qualities.

I'm not trying to offend you, I'm just trying to get down to the meat of the matter. This is apparently a taboo subject for many here.


I will agree that a custom cue can be made more durable. No doubt about it. I seen crappy production cue inlays that pop, swell, crack etcetera. I seen poor quality butts or assembly of butts.

Of course, I'm talking about quality production cues - not garbage. But even then, yes the custom is still made better and more durable because of the tolerance of the various components of the cue and how they are fitted to one another. I understand this completely. But the quality production cue is durable enough. This has to do with the question, how much is enough? I don't pry tree stumps out of the ground with my cue. And if it had that ability due to superior durability, that wouldn't help me or my game one bit whatsoever.

A cue needs to be strong enough to survive normal playing conditions for years and years. That's it as far as durability.




Nothing at all taboo about the subject. I think this rabbit has been ran at least a half-dozen times since I have been on the forum. However I won't spend much more time discussing this with you because you are basing your beliefs on false assumptions to begin with and nobody can change somebody else's beliefs regardless of fact or logic presented. It is like arguing with a christian that there isn't a God or an atheist that there is.

Pictures have been posted multiple times on this forum of the predator shafts failing at the adapter. Won't happen on a custom cue, nobody that I know of uses the adapter as a production shortcut. Predator wouldn't use them either except it speeds and simplifies things in a production environment. Save three minutes on fifty shafts a year and it means nothing. Save three minutes on each of fifty shafts an hour and it significantly increases production. There have also been images posted of badly off center holes in the wonder low deflection shafts. Again the kind of work that never leaves a decent custom shop even if it happens for some reason.

Notice the little detail of how they turn the production cue in the video too, in a very few passes one behind the other. All wood can have residual stress in it from where it was at in the tree and what it supported. If the wood is stressed as we turn it down we relieve these stresses and the wood moves and warps. It often takes time for this to show which is why custom makers make many small passes over months and toss the wood that moves around too much even if it appears perfectly straight at the moment. These multiple heavy passes in factories again speed production and reduce labor costs since the shafts are handled far less. They sacrifice quality assurance in the interest of the bottom line.

There is an assurance of consistent quality from shaft to shaft buying from a good custom maker that just isn't there buying a production cue purely because of the nature of the beast of production runs. I don't have to chase around proving this, images have already been posted on these forums proving my points concerning production shafts. If you doubt me, you are welcome to dig.

Here is a start:
http://forums.azbilliards.com/showthread.php?t=131574&highlight=center+hole+predator

Ever see anything like that from a top custom cue maker?

Hu
 
We're not talking defective cues here.

As was stated earlier, there are production cues that are inconsistent. As well as production cues that aren't straight either.

The discussion here is about a custom cue, that isn't defective and which is consistent vs. a production cue, that isn't defective and is consistent. Does the custom perform better? Does it play better? They don't. It's up to the player to play better.

All a cue can do is react to the impact against the cue ball in the same manner each time. That's all you can expect from a cue. A good cue, regardless of custom or production should do that.

Balance, weight, thickness of grip etcetera are all personal preferences. Someone mentioned that pros have preferences and that having them set they way they like makes them play better. OK, but that also applies to a production cue. Assume another pro is perfectly satisfied with the balance and grip of a production cue - that pro is playing at his/her peak as it fits their preference. However, does that cue play better or worse because it is a production cue? It doesn't.
 
Great post and great responses. Seems most everyone got their opinions across without openly insulting anyone. Rare indeed.
I would like to make a point though.
You mentioned that "sound" from a Stradivarius was actually measured and found superior than other violins. I'm sure that was a conclusion of material and construction from a "master" of the art.
That applies also to the building of cues. Although I have to agree with you in your general view of "custom cue builders", there are "masters" in cue building. And "sound " is what they aspire to. The "sound/resonance" I believe is achieved through knowledge of material and construction just like a "Strad". You can marry wood to joint to shaft to ferrule to tip and achieve something glorious! It's just rare.
 
Last edited:
you made a lot of people mad--GOOD.

I totally agree with your premise.

But, for example, if you tell someone who just spent $2000 on a custom pair of shoes that he could have spent $200 in stead for off the rack, he would be mad too. This may be a bad example since custom shoes take multiple measurements and feel like walking in leather gloves instead of bulky and uncomfortable blocks/gun-boats.

Some may think this is a good analogy since their custom cues feel like extensions of their arms, as Steve Mizerak used to say about his Richard Black cues....

Personally, I adjust to whatever cue I use whether it is a limited production Meucci Original, or custom Richard Chudy, or production J Pechauer, or production Schmelke....etc. The clothes may make the man, but the man makes the cue. :P

From the pool basements of San Francisco
 
Most productions dont even roll straight on the rail right out the box, roll it on the flat bed and it looks great, roll it on the rail and the tips drawing circles in thin air.

If you watch that great authoritative pool movie, The Hustler, Fast Eddie rolls a cue by putting the butt on the cushion and the tip on the bed of the table.

If you tell everyone the correct way to roll a cue, how will thee and me corner the market on truly straight cues?
 
I knew this was gonna get ugly. Stay away from 3 topics on AZ. Custom cues, smoking in poolhalls and the biggest one of all ELBOW DROPPING. Its like politics and religion. No one will ever change their mind and all you get is a 50 page thread of bickering.


Its always fun to watch though. :)
 
I don't own a custom cue (just wanted to get that out of the way). I feel that what makes a custom cue play better to someone vs a production cue was the custom cue was designed to the specs they asked for (balance point, butt weight, shaft weight etc) so it feels more comfortable to them. It's all about feel! So to say a custom cue is no better then a production cue is sorta miss-leading because it may be better to the person who had it designed to exactly what they wanted, but your right that there is no magic or technology that makes them play better. I've seen guys walk in off the street and run rack after rack in straight pool with a crooked house cue. I see custom cues as better quality wise (custom specs, exotic woods, better cuts/grain of wood, exotic wraps, custom pin sizes, balance points, shaft dia, tapper size etc etc) I've done some woodworking before and it's a beautiful thing to see a finished product from a master craftsman.

I am an APA SL4, if I play with my $500 OB cue or a $3,000 Scruggs I'm making the same amount of balls. I'd LOVE to own the Scruggs, but I can't afford it so I am happy with my OB cue. Bottom line is there are some great production cues and some great custom cues and it all comes down to what you prefer to shoot with.

Outstanding post.

LWW
 
Just an observation

I dabble in cue making and I find it interesting that almost without exception the production cues I get do not spin true on the lathe. I have a 15 year old Mottey that has both 2 shafts that spin dead nuts straight. Most of the great custom cue makers have a science on how they pick wood (how striaght the grain is, growth rings etc...). I just worked on a 50 year old Martin - both shafts were still straight - and I mean perfect straight. Most custom cue makers also take many more passes on their shafts when cutting down - mass produced cues I suspect do not.
 
I have spent thousands of dollars on high end cues including customs.
In the end I shoot with a 70$ cue with a cracked buttcap for the simple reason it feels better to me.

Lots of custom cue makers make bad cues that are inconsistent from cue to cue. Some of high end cues are fun to have as a piece of art.
Some people feel special for having one of a kind cue. As for playability it is a hit and miss like with everything else.
 
I think bolo's got a fair point, but a lot of custom cue buyers will freely admit they are buying it for looks and because it's customized to their specs.

If somehow a guy can tell the difference between 21 and 21.5, and that extra half ounce makes his speed control perfect (or whatever) then you can't fault him for paying for a custom 21.5 oz cue.

If it were strictly about playability then you'd see a lot of 21.5 oz, 12.3 mm, pro taper, 61" plain pine sticks. So I think the poster's problem isn't so much with people who make or buy these sticks... I think the problem is with them trying to BS themselves and the rest of the world as to their real reason for buying it.

And, not to single anyone out, but I think this post helped bolo's point by accident:

I buy purely on playability alone. And that includes the two Southwests I've owned, a Joss, Scruggs, Murray Tucker, Andy Gilbert, Gulyassy, Dishaw, and any I may have left out.

You purchased 8-10 custom cues, that sounds like a collector to me. Hell, collector is the wrong word, maybe 'addict' :) How fast do you go through them? If you're all about the playability, why didn't you find one that played perfect and stick with it for 20 years? Did the first 7 customs not hit balls good enough, or fall apart, so you just had to go buy that 8th?! Surely it can't help your consistency to keep switching every few years.

I think a lot of people buy customs because they like to shop around for, pick out, customize and buy things. No shame in that, just be honest about it.
 
OK.. Bola.. I'll bite...

Just explain to me one thing...

From 1962 ish through the 70's into the 80's.. guys like Balsis, Crane, Hopkins, Mizerak, Murphy, Lassiter, Moore, Mosconi, Cranefield, Martin on and on and on.. could have been playing with Palmers, Vikings, Adam cues, Rich, etc.. etc.. but they all chose Balabushka, Szamboti, Ginacue, Rambow etc...

Now I will agree that there probably is a ceiling to how much $$$$ is really necessary to spend on playability. After that it's just what that person decides he can afford.

JV (---come see me in Valley Forge.. the ususal booth...

Agreed, but with an explanation. The pros were good enough to tell the difference between cues. They needed to work with a cue maker who would work with them. They all had their own preferences, so customs were truly that - no cookie cutter cues for them.

Pete Margo told me that he liked working with George Balabushka because he could go to George tell him anything - this tips too hard or that shaft has a buzz, and no matter how many times he had to do it over, Balabushka would do it until everything was just perfect. Gus Szamboti was the same way - loved and adored by his customers. When you're running 200 balls, the last thing you want to worry about is your ferrule popping off.

There was an issue of trust and in many cases, friendship. A cue maker was like a mechanic and a psychologist to those guys - doing them a real service. But it was the cue makers also learned a lot by the interaction and this is why they are the "greats".

Chris
 
Billiards is 95% skill/talent/experience and 5% equipment. Some folks think they can buy themselves into playing a better game. If you buy a custom and it boost's your thinking that your equipment is going to help your game, you'll probably play better.

As we all know, if you approach the table guessing what the outcome of the shot is going to be, you have already talked yourself out of the shot before you even stoke the cue...

With that said, make mine a custom, all day long...
 
OK, then explain to me what is it that the good cue makers are doing in the materials and construction of their cues that makes them play and perform better than a production cue?

Whatever it is that is allegedly creating this superior playability must be recognizable and quantifiable in either methods or materials. Otherwise, we're talking superstition here.

A custom cue is about pride of ownership and craftsmanship. Playability can be found almost anywhere now. And why shouldn't it be? Production cues are copies of cues that were developed by custom makers and just mass produced.

What I see is the greatest advances in innovation will not be coming from custom cue makers but from the aftermarket. Since the popularity of the Predator, OB and Tiger shafts has taken hold, many custom cues are now serving as a fancy handle for aftermarket shafts, and this is not just marketing.

I predict the next wave of high tech shafts, ferrules, and tips is coming and they will be considerably better than the first generation. My prediction is they will combine all of the best traits of conventional shafts with the playing characteristics of LD shafts and will be very consistent, and eventually the improved hit will be embraced by some custom makers as well.

Chris
 
Tap! Tap! Tap!

A custom cue is about pride of ownership and craftsmanship. Playability can be found almost anywhere now. And why shouldn't it be? Production cues are copies of cues that were developed by custom makers and just mass produced.

What I see is the greatest advances in innovation will not be coming from custom cue makers but from the aftermarket. Since the popularity of the Predator, OB and Tiger shafts has taken hold, many custom cues are now serving as a fancy handle for aftermarket shafts, and this is not just marketing.

I predict the next wave of high tech shafts, ferrules, and tips is coming and they will be considerably better than the first generation. My prediction is they will combine all of the best traits of conventional shafts with the playing characteristics of LD shafts and will be very consistent, and eventually the improved hit will be embraced by some custom makers as well.

Chris
Chris,you get big kudo's from me on this. With all the beauty of our legendary cuemakers being respected,the Billiards Industry is constantly being Innovated. Why shouldn't we benefit from the expanses in technology. We witnessed it with the pantograph,CNC,Laser,and others being developed. It is for our benefit that they do this. "Only Change is Permanent."plagairized from somebody,I'm not that smart!!:embarrassed2:
 
This is my cue. There are many like it, but this one is mine. It is my life. I must master it as I must master my life. Without me, my cue is useless. Without my cue, I am useless. I must hit my cue true. I must shoot straighter than the enemy who is trying to take my money. I must pocket the game ball be for he pockets his. I will. My cue and I know that what counts in war is not the rounds we fire, the noise of our burst, or the smoke we make. We know that it is the hits that count. We will hit. My cue is human, even as I am human, because it is my life. Thus, I will learn it as a brother. I will learn its weaknesses, its strengths, its parts, its accessories, its sights and its barrel. I will keep my cue clean and ready, even as I am clean and ready. We will become part of each other. Before God I swear this creed. My cue and I are the defenders of my country. We are the masters of our enemy. We are the saviors of my life. So be it, until victory is America’s and there is no enemy
 
Back
Top