The one thing on a cue that should be able to be taken apart if the need arises is the joint screw. 5 minute epoxy is the best glue for this and after 25+ years I haven't had one come loose yet.
Sorry Robin I am not sure if I understand the term wicking?
MMike
The one thing on a cue that should be able to be taken apart if the need arises is the joint screw. 5 minute epoxy is the best glue for this and after 25+ years I haven't had one come loose yet.
steve must have used NON-CRAPPY epoxy on the other 5000 cues he's built
it's called "shit happens". happens to the best.
we are dealing with man made chemicals that dont ALWAYS do what they are supposed to do.
i had some epoxy that would not dry, would not harden.
manufacturer said i mixed it wrong . that was bullshit
:deadhorse::shocked2:
I was going to add my three cents and provide specific reasons for using G5 in certain areas and other glues in other areas and most importantly why but with all the experts chiming in, there is no need for me to do so.
Let me see if I have all this correct.
1) some write well and have mounds of statistical data which sounds great and makes a good argument
2) others dislike some and just seem to want to argue regardless what the best is or isn't
3) others dislike the disliking people
4) others think excessive over engineering is the best method to build a cue without any regard to resonance, hit and playability or how that over engineering negatively affects the cues resonance. The strongest is not the best when you want build a cue with feel.
Someone said this.... I'm going to ad lib what was actually stated because I don't want anyone to feel targeted or target their harmonically built cues so on that note he stated that basically he uses the strongest, toughest epoxies because they cling better and become much harder.
Super-Duper 40,000 psi glue that becomes "much harder" is not the best choice in certain construction areas as it stiffens and hardens the cues playability. To make a point, using some glues can mean the difference between playing with a steel rod -vs- using proper glues making the cue resonate like a finely tuned billiard instrument with feel.
Putting a cue together is more than just using the best, toughest, highest strength glues but what is best for the specific purpose/application to make the best structurally engineered cue while still maintaining the best resonance and playability. Super-Duper hardening glues defeat that purpose.
Question: is there any difference in feel, hit, resonance when using lets say G5 -vs- West or 3M in certain parts of construction and which parts if there is any difference? Let's see who can answer this question and why there is a difference if there is in fact any difference at all. I have my experience and opinion, lets hear yours. Anyone?
BTW - Happy 4th!
I think the term "wicking" has slightly been taken out of context by folks who are un-aware of the possibility of embracing it. In my opinion wicking is a vital part of solid construction and if some simple practice and common sense is used then glue starvation simply wont be an issue anymore. The lack of wicking is what would scare the hell out of me because at that point you have something hard which is only slightly attached to the surface of something.
I mean the epoxy is absorbed by the wood. It's like a sealer coat. Once I've sealed the wood this way and it has dried, no more epoxy will be absorbed and I get a nice full, void free annulus. Everyone else probably has some other slick way they do coring but this works very well for me.
Robin Snyder
Just as a note on the wicking issue, the end grain of a piece of wood will absorb the most glue. The outer diameter of the piece or your tenon in our case will not wick nearly as much. It is also worth noting that end grain to end grain has the least strength as it concerns wood joints.The strength of your joint is in the diameter of the tenon. So considering those factors I would say that wicking has less of a factor on overall strength of a joint and more about the possibility of creating a buzz. Having stated all that if one knows the problem area's it is not that difficult to compensate for those variables through design and preparation. Leave proper clearances between end grain and seal your ends before gluing.
Anyone who does not think G5 makes the grade for strength for cue construction in these ares, just get a house cue and put a tenon on the rear with v grooves. Wait 7 days and put the cue in a jagged jaw vice real tight and put a 36" pipe wrench of the butt cap and torque the crap out of it and observe what breaks.
JMO,
Rick
i was told i had to mix a minimum of 4 ounces for the epoxy to activateDon't feel bad Brent I have some epoxy over here right now that won't dry. And guess what? I too was told I didn't mix it right. I guess all the other epoxies mix correctly on my scale except this one. The bad part is that it's from one of my favorite suppliers.
i was kinda in the same boatBrent, your observation about penetration was the same one I made which convinced me to pre-glue things. I re-bore my core holes after my first coat of epoxy in there is dry, then juice everything up again and assemble. I make almost all my cues with a full core and I do a lot of cored one-piece butts, so this is of particular interest to me..
Hearing that I may be taking it a step too far is interesting to me since I really don't really know any other cuemakers very well, have never been to anyone else's shop and have never seen anyone else make a cue, so I come up with my own techniques for things and settle on the ones that work by my own trial and error . Generally, I have no idea what others do.
Once in a while I see or hear of something on here where I say to myself "What a good idea!" or "Maybe I'll try that." or even "Damn! I'm doing this all wrong!" Sometimes it's "I think he's full of shit, but hey, I better try this". Or "This guy may be an asshole, but he really knows how to make a cue!" Not too much of that last one, but it comes up.
These things may be obvious to those who have made hundreds of cues but not to me yet..
Occasionally I'll get a PM out of the blue from someone I trust with some new information, which I always appreciate and value, but carefully test anyway.
I think I'll try gluing my cores as Brent described, giving them a pre-soak, then adding more glue, then assembling. It would save me a couple steps and still get the penetration I want. What a good idea!
Robin Snyder
I am still experimenting with the glue I use for cores. Sometimes I use epoxy, which is pretty technique-intensive, and sometimes I use GG, which is quicker and easier. I get good results with both.
I suspect that the variation from one piece of wood to the next is greater than the difference between glue types from a playability standpoint, assuming they are both used effectively (I'm not EVEN going to say correctly), .
My point, and it's not a new one, is that there are LOTS of techniques and materials which, if used in certain ways, will yield outstanding results. "Best" one? There may well be no such thing.
Robin Snyder
I've gotten dizzy trying to read this thread and I can't explain why nobody has mentioned a major ingredient that has to be used when mixing and using epoxy for structural gluing jobs. I've been a West user since 1994 and have never used the slow epoxy without adding a little or a lot of filler. I use Cab-o-sil which I bought in a ten pound bag and is enough for two lifetimes. You can add enough filler to have the epoxy change the viscosity of the glue to that of peanut butter and still have it work just fine. As a thicker material the glue fills up all the voids and still glues with penetration and full stength. It is the only thing I core with and I haven't had a single core buzz. Filled glue also machines very well. It turns off in long tough strips and can be tapped and threaded.