I am not saying Bonus Ball didn't create some havoc in the pro side of the industry which is an utter joke and has been for a very long time but I find it funny its blamed for Tunicas demise. Here is a thread with people who went there and are recovering still from malaria.
http://forums.azbilliards.com/showthread.php?t=338317&highlight=mosquito
As for your statement on TAR it is very true from what I saw and I applaud the effort. I see nothing wrong with a challenge match and it was advertised as such. I enjoyed many of them and realize the trouble with setting up a gambling match. Really the only way to make it happen with stakehorses would be contracts and non refundable post money and penalties.
I know for a fact that when some players left Tunica after Badi's event and didnt play in Greg's that really hurt him on a personal level. It was a huge deal to him even if it was only a couple of guys. That said if Tunica would of been making money and made sense for Caesars and Diamond I think it would of survived.
Its possible Greg decided the juice wasnt worth the squeeze to try and make it work if it wasnt going to get the support. I don't really know. I do think BB takes too much heat for somethings but I also KNOW it did have a big affect on pool during that time frame and it wasn't a positive one. If you look at pool before and after BB you can see a marked difference. Maybe that would of happened anyway I don't know but it did happen.
End of the day BB was just a force in the market that had to be dealt with. Blaming things on it doesnt really make any difference to me.