Got that right.You give a shit. You and a few others in this thread give a massive shit. Probably the biggest shit that anyone in the history of this forum has ever argued against that wasnt an aiming system thread. LOL
Got that right.You give a shit. You and a few others in this thread give a massive shit. Probably the biggest shit that anyone in the history of this forum has ever argued against that wasnt an aiming system thread. LOL
Looks like I already have. LolAsk someone who gives a sh*t.
Me too....entertaining as hell. Gives an old retired guy something to giggle about!This ass-hattery in this thread is downright hysterical. It stays on the front page. It will for years to come probably.... at least I hope so.
More like conjoined twins who ate each other in the womb.Me too....entertaining as hell. Gives an old retired guy something to giggle about!
I'm starting to think that xradarx and Mr. Harriman were conjoined twins separated at birth.
Maniac
Quoting before DeletionY’all should know, being conjoined at the asshole with a number of others here.
Y’all tell us how it feels when you scratch your asses and find that you have to apologize for scratching someone else’s ass.
There's quite a trail left behind and nobody cares until they do.The internet is an inanimate object, which hasn’t developed a memory yet.
No one cares.
Not Yesterday.
Not Tomorrow, which never arrives.
Not Next Week.
No one, especially gives a shit for your diatribes and hate for Dan Harriman, even to the extent that you and three or four others would like to represent that he is some kind of schizophrenic magician that can be in several places at the same time.
Now about those 14.1 conspiracies that you continue to espouse on others, did you ever reply to Lou when he gave you the same authority to correspond upon your conspiracy accusations about others espousing nonexistent conspiracies re; js626?
You need to take a minute or two and get your own shithouse in order, before falsely accusing others.
Do they get to “condition” the table and balls every so often like John did?Hooray, the super duper 14.1 table is ALMOST done. 5" pockets. Now John gets to watch jealousy fund a charge at his world record. Because, whether anyone breaks Willie's record or not, John's is the record that is in the record books so his is the one to beat. No matter what happens they are chasing John Schmidt's world record run of 626 consecutive balls.
I know of two people whom I will give great odds against them breaking John's record on the super duper table.
Because the Willie mosconi crowd gets their panties in a bunch thinking about it.I didn’t know anyone was disputing it. I also haven’t been paying much attention either. He ran 626 on video, then it was reviewed and confirmed a new world record by a committee or something, right? Why wouldn’t it be legit?
If John did it then the promoter probably won't do it, including beating John's record.Do they get to “condition” the table and balls every so often like John did?
Snooker players get the ball cleaned by the ref on request anytime they want.Do they get to “condition” the table and balls every so often like John did?
Yeah...but if you ignore fact, x626x is spot on.Snooker players get the ball cleaned by the ref on request anytime they want.
Golfers clean the ball before they putt.
Can they rack the balls at the opposite end of the table every so often.Snooker players get the ball cleaned by the ref on request anytime they want.
Golfers clean the ball before they putt.
If deemed necessary by the organizer, of course.Can they rack the balls at the opposite end of the table every so often.
If deemed necessary by the organizer, of course.
Such a change would not impact the attributes of the game.
Are we playing call all kisses and rail touches now?
Not happening.Can they rack the balls at the opposite end of the table every so often.
Good.Not happening.
C'mon. You could certainly suggest a more creative allegation.The could be doing “do overs” for all I know.