Jay, you and I have always had a similar vision for our sport, but that said, the question in front of us is whether players should publicly bash promoters who haven't given them their due respect. My opinion is that negative feedback to promoters needs to be offered behind closed doors and in private. I am of the opinion that this will sensitize those promoters to the issues that the players face and it gives them a chance to address those issues going forward without losing face.
A good example is the Joss Tour, in which Mike Zuglan, based on what his players have asked for over the years, molded things over time and ensured orderly events which virtually never run late. The Turning Stone events fill the field of 128 well in advance of the event date, a testament to how keen players are to play in Joss events, but it wasn't always that way. The trust between promoter and players was nurtured and grew over time, and that's a credit to both Zuglan and his loyal contingent of players.
For me, the Tornado Open is a breath of fresh air for pro pool, with mixed pro scotch doubles, men's pro singles and women's pro singles. It's the most innovative idea in pro pool in recent times and while it may need improvement in numerous respects, the focus has to be on sustaining it. Cooperation is the path to ensuring this, and, regardless of the facts, public bashing of those who run the event isn't a good thing.
As for the "angel" being pool's only hope, I think you'll need a wealthy person who is a lousy businessman, for only a lousy businessman would persist with an investment that shows no growth prospects. Pool's product needs development, for without such development, it will fail even if the so called "angel" arrives. It's easy and convenient to say "give me enough money and I can sell pro pool" but far more difficult to recognize that "improve the pool product and then somebody might be able to sell it" is a far more realistic point of view.
Looking forward to seeing you at the US Open, Jay.
Thanks Stu for getting back to me about this issue. Sad to say we haven't heard the half of it on here. It was a lot uglier that you think. I got it first hand from people whose opinion I trust.