I won't suggest that I know all the facts in the case, but I think we can safely assume that Jasmin's request for a waiver to play in the WTBC was denied by the WPBA Board. Had it been granted, there would be no controversy here at all.
Whether the waiver should have been granted is, of course, a matter for debate, and certainly, the issue is far from cut and dried.
On the one hand, the exclusive rights that are spelled out in the WPBA player contracts are vital, as they enable the WPBA to raise more money from title and venue sponsors, who understand that it makes their product more special. This, of course, increases WPBA prize funds, which have grown steadily over the years.
On the other hand, it's obvious that credible performances by Jasmin, such as her strong finish at the World 14.1 Championships, against the elite men, enhance the image of and bring positive press to women's pool and the WPBA.
Let's cut to the chase. If Jasmin played in the WTBC when the waiver was denied by the WPBA Board, she was in knowing violation of WPBA rules, and some sort of penalty was called for. Whether she announced her intention to play in the WTBC to the WPBA organization despite the lack of a waiver is a mitigating, though not an excusing, factor. Whether the penalty dished out was appropriate is another matter for debate, and as I don't know how similar matters have been dealt with in the past, I'd rather not comment.
Finally, to those who see the WPBA as lacking vision, consider how tricky this matter really is. I'm sure this was a very difficult decision for the Board, as I'm sure they understand that Jasmin is one of their headliners. Ultimately, I hope that the WPBA bends when it comes to similar waivers requested by Jasmin in the future, but I leave the matter in their capable hands. The WPBA, through superior management and policies, has produced America's only long-lasting pro pool tour, and I have confidence they will, ultimately, do the right thing.