Life after APA

Since quitting league what do you do?

  • Gamble

    Votes: 1 1.4%
  • Tournaments

    Votes: 17 23.3%
  • Gambling and Tournamanets

    Votes: 35 47.9%
  • Something else

    Votes: 20 27.4%

  • Total voters
    73

rburgoyne

AzB Silver Member
Silver Member
I have been playing APA for about 8-9 years now and I think I am just tired of it. I was a captain for a lot of that time and decided to quit being captain a couple of sessions ago, but my thoughts of league haven't changed much. Its just not fun anymore. It is still a bunch of the same old BS, people not showing up, players with no etiquette, people quitting mid session, and the feeling like I get nothing worthwhile back from our APA division with everything I have given in.

Out of my 8-9 years playing in the APA I have put a lot of money in and all I have gotten back was a bunch of the same old patches and a bunch of crappy plaques, which all look the same except they got a little smaller a couple of years ago.

I have played in a couple local bar tournaments and break contests in the past two weeks and have made about $200 doing so, and can honestly say I enjoyed shooting and took it much more serious than league. So I am pretty sure this is my last session for a while, and I am just going to play tournaments from now on.

I know there are a lot of people on here that quit the APA, just wondering what turned some of you off and what you do most of now, gambling, tournaments or both.
 
Join the boycott of the apa!!!

I have been playing APA for about 8-9 years now and I think I am just tired of it. I was a captain for a lot of that time and decided to quit being captain a couple of sessions ago, but my thoughts of league haven't changed much. Its just not fun anymore. It is still a bunch of the same old BS, people not showing up, players with no etiquette, people quitting mid session, and the feeling like I get nothing worthwhile back from our APA division with everything I have given in.

Out of my 8-9 years playing in the APA I have put a lot of money in and all I have gotten back was a bunch of the same old patches and a bunch of crappy plaques, which all look the same except they got a little smaller a couple of years ago.

I have played in a couple local bar tournaments and break contests in the past two weeks and have made about $200 doing so, and can honestly say I enjoyed shooting and took it much more serious than league. So I am pretty sure this is my last session for a while, and I am just going to play tournaments from now on.

I know there are a lot of people on here that quit the APA, just wondering what turned some of you off and what you do most of now, gambling, tournaments or both.

As I've often said on here, I think the root of the problem is the "23 rule" which causes a situation where people are forced to sandbag if they want to keep their team intact! This has ruined league play for most of the serious players which just leaves the bangers and the "educated cheaters" who have figured out how to keep their handicaps low enough while still winning enough matches to snag that "BIG CARROT", their trip to Vegas! The same teams go almost every year. You know the ones in your area that I'm talking about. What in my opinion really makes it a shame is that the sport is suffering, overall, because of the "23 Rule" and it's only real purpose is to divide the teams thus creating more teams to pay the weekly dues to the APA, making Larry Hubbart and Terry Bell very rich, while the rest of the players and the sport itself suffers. Those who continue to play and donate to the guys in ST. Louis are the ones who deserve what they get! I personally feel we pool players should unite and BOYCOTT the APA until they change the system to reward players for improving rather than punish them!
 
As I've often said on here, I think the root of the problem is the "23 rule" which causes a situation where people are forced to sandbag if they want to keep their team intact! This has ruined league play for most of the serious players which just leaves the bangers and the "educated cheaters" who have figured out how to keep their handicaps low enough while still winning enough matches to snag that "BIG CARROT", their trip to Vegas! The same teams go almost every year. You know the ones in your area that I'm talking about. What in my opinion really makes it a shame is that the sport is suffering, overall, because of the "23 Rule" and it's only real purpose is to divide the teams thus creating more teams to pay the weekly dues to the APA, making Larry Hubbart and Terry Bell very rich, while the rest of the players and the sport itself suffers. Those who continue to play and donate to the guys in ST. Louis are the ones who deserve what they get! I personally feel we pool players should unite and BOYCOTT the APA until they change the system to reward players for improving rather than punish them!

bingo. just quit this last session.
 
I think playing in tournaments is the right way to go. Also, consider joining a valley or bca league. This can qualify you for tournaments including Vegas each year. Gambling opens up a new can of worms about matching up, playing, collecting, etc. It's not necessarily bad but just a different mindset. Play a good valley or bca league and sprinkle in some tournaments.

As a side note, APA may have it's issues as any league but give them credit for bringing in new players to the sport.
 
I went ahead and voted "something else" because I still shoot league, a BCA league, in which I have never had any issues.

I am moving on from APA leagues after this session. If I ever try APA again, it's going to have to be in a different franchise area. I am going to try shooting in more tournaments also.

Maniac
 
As I've often said on here, I think the root of the problem is the "23 rule" which causes a situation where people are forced to sandbag if they want to keep their team intact! This has ruined league play for most of the serious players which just leaves the bangers and the "educated cheaters" who have figured out how to keep their handicaps low enough while still winning enough matches to snag that "BIG CARROT", their trip to Vegas! The same teams go almost every year. You know the ones in your area that I'm talking about. What in my opinion really makes it a shame is that the sport is suffering, overall, because of the "23 Rule" and it's only real purpose is to divide the teams thus creating more teams to pay the weekly dues to the APA, making Larry Hubbart and Terry Bell very rich, while the rest of the players and the sport itself suffers. Those who continue to play and donate to the guys in ST. Louis are the ones who deserve what they get! I personally feel we pool players should unite and BOYCOTT the APA until they change the system to reward players for improving rather than punish them!

Sherm,

Which of these teams are you referring to in my area that win "every year". My L.O. sent 3 8-ball and 1 9-ball teams to Vegas for this August and only 1 player on any of those teams had gone before (he went 4 years ago). We also sent 4 doubles teams and 1 masters team and ony 2 of those players have ever been before and none went last year.

Also, as I have commented before, we do not have a sandbagging problem in the league in which i play. The TAP legaue has taken most of those sandbaggers and the others have all quit. You will call me nieve, and maybe I am, but I play pool for the sake of playing pool with my wife and friends ( I am a 7) and have never been forced to "sandbag to stay together" as you call it. We replace a player or 2 every year - because a guy has gone on nights or just doesn't want to play anymore. Then we find a new low end player and we are all good.

Also, as you have stated before, you belive the 23 rule is designed to split up teams. Again, you will likely call me nieve, but could it be that the primary purpose of the 23 rule is to keep teams from stacking a team so that they don't dominate other teams as happens in BCA and TAP in my area. In fact, the same TAP team won 3 years in a row and their hadicaps went down the third year. I actually played on the BCA team that won every year and our league went from 16 teams down to 6 because of it.

If splitting of teams is a by-product of the 23 rule then so be it. If you have a problem with somebody at the APA making money, then you must have a problem with a capitalist system. They have designed a leqague system that 250,000 + people like and if they make money, then good for them. That is how business works. Is it safe to assume that you sell your produst for a profit.

As for the APA in genreal, it has been said in many posts (and i know you have read them because you seem to have a lot to say to APA Operator on many occassions) the success of an individual league is mainly up to the L.O. In my area, the L.O.'s are great. They put alot back in to the league and they should get paid becuase that is their business and they do a good job at it. There may be some area's where the L.O. sucks and if that is the case, that is too bad because players will miss out on what they could otherwise have.

Bottom line, the APA is only what you make out of it. If you are looking to make money, wrong league for you. If you are looking for a good time with a fair chance to win a trip (or a small amount of cash in my area) then the APA is lilely for you. Not everyone will like it but for someone who is in the pool business to suggest that we should all boycott the APA is pretty dumb in my opinion. While I don't have any numbers to prove this, I would guess that the APA brings more NEW players to the game than any other organization. If i am wrong, could somebody please tell me who brings in more "grassroots players"


Regards,

Leagueguy
 
I have been playing APA for about 8-9 years now and I think I am just tired of it. I was a captain for a lot of that time and decided to quit being captain a couple of sessions ago, but my thoughts of league haven't changed much. Its just not fun anymore. It is still a bunch of the same old BS, people not showing up, players with no etiquette, people quitting mid session, and the feeling like I get nothing worthwhile back from our APA division with everything I have given in.

Out of my 8-9 years playing in the APA I have put a lot of money in and all I have gotten back was a bunch of the same old patches and a bunch of crappy plaques, which all look the same except they got a little smaller a couple of years ago.

I have played in a couple local bar tournaments and break contests in the past two weeks and have made about $200 doing so, and can honestly say I enjoyed shooting and took it much more serious than league. So I am pretty sure this is my last session for a while, and I am just going to play tournaments from now on.

I know there are a lot of people on here that quit the APA, just wondering what turned some of you off and what you do most of now, gambling, tournaments or both.

Quit, hang out at local pool hall learning one-pocket and straight pool. You will become a much better player.
 
There is no life after the APA. Only a long slow death at the table playing One Pocket forever. :yeah:
 
APA for Me

Maybe I am in the minority here but I have enjoyed playing in the APA since January 2000. I think the 23 rule gives the lower handicapped players a chance to compete and with the Equalizer system, a chance to win against a high skill level player. I agree that much of the pleasure or in your case discontent could be attributed to the LO in your area. I also agree that it promotes sandbagging which I deplore (to the point that when my skill level went up I asked my LO to lock it in). To me my higher skill level means I have learned a lot and my game is improving. Much of the credit for this goes to the APA and my experience with it. I also play tournaments to see how I am measuring up with other players in the southeast area. I play pool because I absolutely love the game. We must remember that this is why we play. Winning should take second place to enjoying the sport.
 
I play in a heads up league and also played in the BCA.

The BCA has it's flaws also. Everyone will end up as a 6, 7 or 8 and it really doesn't have any real indication of skill or really play into the outcome. The skill level in the BCA is affect by the quality and strength of the league and not the skill of the players. If all of the players in the league are poor players some one will have to win and the other will probably at least have made 6 balls. These could be either a 2 or 3 in the APA but they will end up as a 6 or 8. Now take a strong league where many players do B & R they will all end up as 5's because they get 0 and the other player gets 10 for every game. Keep alternating this and you end up as a 5.
 
Sherm,

Which of these teams are you referring to in my area that win "every year". My L.O. sent 3 8-ball and 1 9-ball teams to Vegas for this August and only 1 player on any of those teams had gone before (he went 4 years ago). We also sent 4 doubles teams and 1 masters team and ony 2 of those players have ever been before and none went last year.

I don't know about your area but in the Greater Cincinnati area this has always been true. I don't think there is any 9-ball leagues or the "Open or Masters" divisions, I've heard there were elsewhere.




Also, as I have commented before, we do not have a sandbagging problem in the league in which i play. The TAP legaue has taken most of those sandbaggers and the others have all quit. You will call me nieve, and maybe I am, but I play pool for the sake of playing pool with my wife and friends ( I am a 7) and have never been forced to "sandbag to stay together" as you call it. We replace a player or 2 every year - because a guy has gone on nights or just doesn't want to play anymore. Then we find a new low end player and we are all good.


I can't call you a liar, I don't know you, but if you say there is no sandbagging problem in your league, you're either naive or have been so used to seeing it you don't even recognize it as such. Maybe your team has been able to stay together because the player have topped out. They aren't capable of improving, even though I find that remarkable that if there is a "7" on the team, your team mates aren't able to learn to improve. I find that "mind boggeling"!



Also, as you have stated before, you belive the 23 rule is designed to split up teams. Again, you will likely call me nieve, but could it be that the primary purpose of the 23 rule is to keep teams from stacking a team so that they don't dominate other teams as happens in BCA and TAP in my area. In fact, the same TAP team won 3 years in a row and their hadicaps went down the third year. I actually played on the BCA team that won every year and our league went from 16 teams down to 6 because of it.
You can believe that BS if you want, but it's just that BS. I've even had LO's come into my bar trying to sell me on having the APA in my bar who explained this as part of the APA's big plan! The "23 rule" is close to being a pyramid scheme, and is only really there to make more teams and more money for the APA! I've never played in a BCA or TAP league, but if they have a "23 rule" I'll boycott them too. If "stacking teams" were the issue, that doesn't say much for their handicap system, does it. If the handicap system worked, the "23 rule" would be totally unnecessary except to divide teams to make more money!


If splitting of teams is a by-product of the 23 rule then so be it. If you have a problem with somebody at the APA making money, then you must have a problem with a capitalist system. They have designed a leqague system that 250,000 + people like and if they make money, then good for them. That is how business works. Is it safe to assume that you sell your produst for a profit.
"So be it " hell! That's stupid! And I don't begrudge anyone making money, I just don't like to be gouged and lied to about why they are gouging me. And what makes you think that the 250,000 league member "like the system"? I don't know a single person in any of the APA leagues I've played in that like the system! Most play because it's the only game in town. That's whats so sad!



As for the APA in genreal, it has been said in many posts (and i know you have read them because you seem to have a lot to say to APA Operator on many occassions) the success of an individual league is mainly up to the L.O. In my area, the L.O.'s are great. They put alot back in to the league and they should get paid becuase that is their business and they do a good job at it. There may be some area's where the L.O. sucks and if that is the case, that is too bad because players will miss out on what they could otherwise have.


In my area we've had some bad LO's and some terrible ones. I can't speak for the ones now from a personal perspective because I've been boycotting the league for about 10 years. But I also played in the league for over 10 years and was NEVER at any time happy with it, but I hoped in the beginning that we could change it from within. That didn't work, any complaints about the rules, especially the stupid "23 Rule" always fell on deaf ears! I went so far as to purchase the franchise for the "Heart Of Ohio Pool League" back in the 90's and frankly I've never seen anything so easy to sell! We were eating the APA's lunch the first year and Lunch & Dinner by the second year! All I had to tell the bar owners was that "It's not the APA. They don't punish teams for improving!" For 2 years I ran it pretty much single handedly and I wanted out! I don't begrudge the LO's making a decent living, they certainly earn it! But the guys at the top, Terry Bell and Larry Hubbart are getting stinking rich! And I wouldn't even care about that if they did it without the "23 Rule"! That is what ruins the league play. They're no longer playing pool, they're playing a numbers game to keep their handicaps where they need to be so their team can stay together. The concept of breaking up a team of guys who have played together for a season or two and improved their game a SL or 2 in that time and gone over that magic number of 23 is in my mind outrageous! Maybe they don't want to play on a different team with new and different players, their only option is to play that sandbagging game. There are even books out there that tell team captains how to manipulate their team into the Nationals in Vegas! To say this doesn't happen is very close minded and naive.






Bottom line, the APA is only what you make out of it. If you are looking to make money, wrong league for you. If you are looking for a good time with a fair chance to win a trip (or a small amount of cash in my area) then the APA is lilely for you. Not everyone will like it but for someone who is in the pool business to suggest that we should all boycott the APA is pretty dumb in my opinion. While I don't have any numbers to prove this, I would guess that the APA brings more NEW players to the game than any other organization. If i am wrong, could somebody please tell me who brings in more "grassroots players"


Regards,

Leagueguy

NO, the APA isn't what we make of it, IT'S OBVIOUSLY WHAT TERRY BELL AND LARRY HUBBART MADE IT! If that's your cup of tea, more power to you! But I really think that while there are a LOT of APA players, DAMN few are happy with the rules, but they have no power to change them!

If you're in any league for the money, you better get a JOB! The money really doesn't matter to me except for the fact that I don't like to be cheated, and I feel the "23 rule" is cheating in a way. It's like the Casinos telling you that you can play for an hour normally but after that you have to play 2 hands instead of one by bringing in another player and they keep all the ante. They are greedy and do not care if their policy is good for pool or not as long as they get rich in the process! Instead of a 23 rule, make the handicap system level the playing field. OR have an OPEN DIVISION FOR TEAMS WITH HANDICAPS OVER A CERTAIN NUMBER. Then if a team reaches that point they would have to move over the next session, provided there was a division to move into! Anything but forcing them to break up! That in my mind is really the key issue! That is punishing them for improving or for not sandbagging! I just don't see how anyone could find that a good alternative! This is all I'm going to say on the subject, it's been beat to death already, and I'm tired of trying to explain to people how this is really bad for pool. If you don't get it, you just don't get it!
 
Apa.....

Here is what I know The good and the bad.

APA is a league, (duh)= not gonna get rich. I will say that the APA just starting up here in Abilene, has saved at least one pool hall.

That being said I hate the 23 rule and the fact that me and my wife we both enjoy the game and and play pretty good. we cannot play on the same night, and there are no scotch doubles tournaments that we can play in. also with our league being new and starting out we cannot qualify for vegas. (if I am wrong than please inform me what i can do and educate me )

while the competition, and money is better in the tournaments the pool rooms don't make any money on them.

I hope that the APA will do something to alow higher rated players compete regulary (not holding breath am addicted to breathing )


just my .02
 
Here is what I know The good and the bad.

APA is a league, (duh)= not gonna get rich. I will say that the APA just starting up here in Abilene, has saved at least one pool hall.

That being said I hate the 23 rule and the fact that me and my wife we both enjoy the game and and play pretty good. we cannot play on the same night, and there are no scotch doubles tournaments that we can play in. also with our league being new and starting out we cannot qualify for vegas. (if I am wrong than please inform me what i can do and educate me )

while the competition, and money is better in the tournaments the pool rooms don't make any money on them.

I hope that the APA will do something to alow higher rated players compete regulary (not holding breath am addicted to breathing )


just my .02

Actually a pool hall can make money on tournaments if they are structured and ran right. I used to run tournaments in my pool room on Monday and Tuesday nights that were very successful and Monday and Tuesdays were by FAR my best nights easily surpassing the weekends. I had a race to 1 DBL elim 9 ball tourney on Mon night and Tues it was draw partners and alternate shot (Cincinnati Partners) 9-ball race to 1 dbl elim. The entry fee was only $7 with $2 of that going into the "jackpot" the rest paid out to the tourney winners. I'd get 30-50 players each night! I'd also add $20 each tourney to the jackpot fund which was what really brought the players out. The Jackpot was such: There were up to 2 names drawn each night and tournament winners were not in the draw to shoot at the jackpot. Didn't take long for the jackpot to reach $1000, where we cut the first jackpot off and started a second one so that if/when someone hit the JP the tourney wouldn't die because there was another one behind it for backup. To win, we racked up a 9-ball rack on the tightest table in the house and you had to either make the 9 on the break, a legal combo or run out from the break. No one was barred out. The race to 1 was a great equalizer and the draw partners had people hoping to draw Gary Spaeth or one of the other top players for their partners, and it was still a race to 1. Oh and I forgot to mention that in order to keep the players coming to the tourneys, we had a rule that to be eligible for the full jackpot, you had to have played in 2 out of the last 4 tournaments. If you were a first timer you could only win half of the jackpot amount. This also gave them incentive to make as many tournaments as possible without keeping newer players from winning a good sum too.
This format works well and will fill up a poolroom on dead nights as well. If anyone is interested in trying it in their pool rooms, feel free to contact me and I'll be glad to help them through the details.
 
Last edited:
NO, the APA isn't what we make of it, IT'S OBVIOUSLY WHAT TERRY BELL AND LARRY HUBBART MADE IT!

I can't disagree with you on this point. Terry Bell and Larry Hubbart made a product that brings new players into the sport and a business with over a quarter million customers. They worked their tails off 31 years ago to build their idea into a business. That business has grown steadily for the entire length of its existence. Many many people in this country have made a lot more money by doing less. Don't make them out as thieves - they earned their reward. If it was easy, don't you think a lot more people would have done it?

If that's your cup of tea, more power to you! But I really think that while there are a LOT of APA players, DAMN few are happy with the rules, but they have no power to change them!

Sure they do. Every one of them can change the rules to something everyone likes, by creating their own organization. Actually, it should only take one, right? Once such an organization exists, certainly all but that DAMN few would flock right to it, wouldn't they? I guess that explains why there are so many wildly successful APA knockoffs. The knockoffs all start out the same way - copy APA, but change a few rules you think nobody likes. The concept sells well at first, but you soon find out that it's a lot more work than you thought, and if you want to sustain it you have to change some of the rules back. You also find out that you've attracted all of the worst cheaters from the APA league, and your change to eliminate the 23 rule didn't make them want to stop cheating at all! You get a handful of stacked teams, and those teams try to gain an advantage over each other by doing what? SANDBAGGING. Go ahead, take that national. When you're done banging your head against the wall, come back and tell us how much money Terry Bell and Larry Hubbart have been "stealing".

If you're in any league for the money, you better get a JOB! The money really doesn't matter to me except for the fact that I don't like to be cheated, and I feel the "23 rule" is cheating in a way. It's like the Casinos telling you that you can play for an hour normally but after that you have to play 2 hands instead of one by bringing in another player and they keep all the ante. They are greedy and do not care if their policy is good for pool or not as long as they get rich in the process! Instead of a 23 rule, make the handicap system level the playing field.

That has been discussed here before. Take the best player you know and the worst player you know, and match them up. What would the spot need to be to make it an even money match? There isn't enough time in a league night to play races that long. So, you do the next best thing - acknowledge that the stronger player has the advantage in a shorter race, and take measures to keep teams from stacking themselves with the stronger players.

OR have an OPEN DIVISION FOR TEAMS WITH HANDICAPS OVER A CERTAIN NUMBER. Then if a team reaches that point they would have to move over the next session, provided there was a division to move into!

Are you talking about a scratch division, with no handicaps, or a handicapped division with no cap? Either way, given the time constraints, the best players will join forces and dominate, which probably means there won't be a division to move into.

Anything but forcing them to break up! That in my mind is really the key issue! That is punishing them for improving or for not sandbagging! I just don't see how anyone could find that a good alternative!

It doesn't have to be a good alternative to be the best alternative. To date, it is the only alternative that doesn't result in dominant teams that kill your league, and it's been in effect long enough that SOMEONE would have thought of something better by now, if something better existed. Contrary to what you believe, I don't like it when teams have to break up. Do I get more teams out of it? Sometimes. But sometimes I lose a team or at the least some players. It sucks for the team, and it sucks for me too.
 
I think it's amazing that 1 dollar from every league player isn't put into a slush fund to create a base a for professional players association/tour.
Who knows? Any thoughts?
 
I think it's amazing that 1 dollar from every league player isn't put into a slush fund to create a base a for professional players association/tour.
Who knows? Any thoughts?

I don't think it would be right to take money away from the grass roots players so that the top players can have a tour. If we really want to grow the professional game then we need to figure out how to make pool more mainstream and television friendly so that people will want to watch it.

In order for this to happen, the players need to be the ones to make it happen. They need to be doing exhibitions locally to grow interest in the game. They need to conduct themselves like professionals to show adults that it is a good game to let the kids watch and play. We should have Junior leagues and grow the game from the kids out.

We should be finding a TV cable network that will produce and show the US open live. It does not need to be ESPN. Maybe a professional tour could convince Versus to do it. Having ESPN 2 playing a amatch from 2 years ago to fill a time slot does the game no good. We need to start out small and have 2 or 3 major tournaments broadcast live on small networks. Then we could see after 2 or 3 years if the popularity of the game is growing.

We should get the leagues together to promote these events. Have the BCA, VNEA and APA all advertise this event to all their members. What network would not want to take advantage of an evenet where they have an alreday advertised marjet of 500,000 people with no rights fees to broadcast the event. The only cost to the network is the cost oif production. They could then see adveryising. The network makes moeny and our game gets exposure.

We need a profeesional association that is willing to take 1 step back in order to take 2 steps forward.

Just my opinion.

Leagueguy
 
Back
Top