Meucci went overseas!!!

JCIN said:
As for what it takes to play the game, everyone with any sense knows it's the Indian not the arrow, but, if you have never paid more than $250 for a cue how do you know if there is any difference or not between a Meucci and a South West? Because there is a big difference. That difference may not influence your level of play but there is a major difference in the two.

With all respect. In the 45+ yrs I've been playing this game, I think I may have played with every brand cue ever made. That doesn't mean I had to buy them to play with them. :) One of the hugest differences you can realize in any cue's hit can be obtained by simply changing tips and tapers.

My buddy has a Southwest he uses when we play straight pool. Shoot, I've had him close to wrapping it around a lolly column in his basement many times. :) I've played with his cue many times also. Its nice, it would take additional time to get used to, but lets face it, ALL cues play differently and that may or may not be better or worse, just differently.

He's a fanatic about his cues, tips and just about every facet of his play. He's very serious and very good. It just isn't my thing, and to be honest, I didn't like the way his cue played. Primarily because I'm so used to mine I'm sure. If I played with it for a month or so, I'd most likely think differently about it also. One thing I know for sure, I'd never waste (IMO) 1600 bucks on one. If I weren't retired on a fixed income, and I had a ton of money in the bank, I'd spend it on a thousand other things rather than an expensive cue.

My point is that its been my experience most people who spend big bucks (that more than 2 or 3 hundred 3andstop dollars :) ) are more into prestige and collecting. There is nothing wrong with any hobby any person has, its saying the others are junk that is inaccurate. They aren't junk, they just aren't anything special.

When I look at the workmanship in my cues I see all of 250 bucks. :) When I think about support, hmm .. this isn't a high end software we're talking about. This is two pieces of wood screwed together with a tip that's glued on. No batteries, no moving parts, no need for support IMO. :)

In the end, to each his own. I just kind of dislike hearing any (not just meucci) but any lower end stick called junk. Shoot, Viking, McDermott, even Lucasi and Player cues will play just fine with a tad of personalized tweaking like taper and tip.

**edit
I will admit I have not in recent years actually played with a newer meucci, but I can't imagine it much worse than the other lower end cues I mentioned.
 
Last edited:
teebee said:
It is hard to admit on this forum that you own meucci cues and worse yet really like them. I am guilty of both. I bought mine before becoming a member here and really like them. The are nice looking , straight and seem to play well (I am Not a good player).
Had I been a member here for a while I would never have considered buying a Meucci. How did they get such a ba d reputation and why do people feel that they do not play well?

I think it was Fast Larry who said about the original owner transferring the operation to his in-laws, but the in-laws just ran it to the ground.
 
Last edited:
3andstop said:
**edit
I will admit I have not in recent years actually played with a newer meucci, but I can't imagine it much worse than the other lower end cues I mentioned.

Missing inlays, inserts coming out out of the box, cracked ferrules after the first day of shooting, inlays raised when shipped, weight bolts loose, rattles, lost cues that were sent back for repair, wrong cues shipped.

A lot of pool halls/pro shops have had to resort to 1 of two things...discontinue selling them...or go through them and have their local cuesmith do some repairs and send the worse ones back.

Your philosophy regarding high cost and low cost has nothing to do with the abysmal quality that Meucci has sunk to over the years.

To the best of my observations, 92 or so was the start of the major decline. They were damn good cues for a long time. I have played with some damn fine Meuccis from the 70's and 80's. There are gems from the 90's and 2000's as well, and they still play well, but they are simply not the norm, and their name is ruined when you compare them to the cues they used to be, or the other respected high quality production cues being made today.

Kelly
 
CrownCityCorey said:
Whether Meucci was/is crap or not is not the point. Meucci was one of the last made in USA major cue production outfits.

Viking and Joss may be the only major ones left (of course there's us, but were small ;) ) for USA only.
McDermott still makes their cues in the US. The "Star" line is made offshore, and that's why the warranties are different. The entire McDermott cue line (not Star, "McDermott") is made in Wisconsin. Made in the USA.
 
When I look at the workmanship in my cues I see all of 250 bucks. :) When I think about support, hmm .. this isn't a high end software we're talking about. This is two pieces of wood screwed together with a tip that's glued on. No batteries, no moving parts, no need for support IMO. :)

In the end, to each his own. I just kind of dislike hearing any (not just meucci) but any lower end stick called junk. Shoot, Viking, McDermott, even Lucasi and Player cues will play just fine with a tad of personalized tweaking like taper and tip.

i'm not trying to argue this part of what you said. it's not high end software but in the long run i'm betting the wood keeps it's value longer than most software
 
I have never owned a Meucci, but I have hit with 4 or 5 of them. I can honestly say that I did not like any of them, so I never considered buying one.

Russ...
 
Kelly_Guy said:
To the best of my observations, 92 or so was the start of the major decline. They were damn good cues for a long time. I have played with some damn fine Meuccis from the 70's and 80's. There are gems from the 90's and 2000's as well, and they still play well, but they are simply not the norm, and their name is ruined when you compare them to the cues they used to be, or the other respected high quality production cues being made today.

Kelly

I might push that out a year or two.. 1994-195 seemed to be when Meucci was making the "Maximum" series, with the unvarnished wrap.

I really liked those cues, and actually recently found the exact model and color Meucci Maximum that I have been looking for for over a year.

The auction says it is older dealer stock, never played with, and I know I payed too much for it, but at this point, it's a matter of getting the same basic cue I learned to really play with, so it was worth it.

Russ
 
I think they were still making decent stuff in the early 90's

I have a Meucci from 1992 I think... plays really well, and never had any problems with it. It is one of their lower end cues from that time, and everyone I let hit with it has liked it. That being said, it is not my main player.
 
teebee said:
It is hard to admit on this forum that you own meucci cues and worse yet really like them. I am guilty of both. I bought mine before becoming a member here and really like them. The are nice looking , straight and seem to play well (I am Not a good player).
Had I been a member here for a while I would never have considered buying a Meucci. How did they get such a ba d reputation and why do people feel that they do not play well?


LOL1 If a tree falls in the woods & nobody hears it... .
If you buy a Meucci & it plays good before everybody tells
you how bad it is, does it quit playing good?
The same thing happened to me with Dale Perry.
I bought 2 & thought they played great. Then I come on
here & it is explained to me how bad they are.
I wonder what I could have been thinking!:rolleyes: :rolleyes:
 
hondo said:
LOL1 If a tree falls in the woods & nobody hears it... .
If you buy a Meucci & it plays good before everybody tells
you how bad it is, does it quit playing good?
The same thing happened to me with Dale Perry.
I bought 2 & thought they played great. Then I come on
here & it is explained to me how bad they are.
I wonder what I could have been thinking!:rolleyes: :rolleyes:


You said it well. Now as for someone mentioning the covered wraps, you could sit in a cue makers workshop for two days straight having him replace wrap after wrap until you find something you like for the difference in price I see some paying for custom cues. I had the wrap exposed on one of my old meucci's way back. Paul Drexler did it for me, so its a custom cue now. I call it my Drooxi. :) btw, I don't use it, I like the covered wrap. :)
 
Kelly_Guy said:
To the best of my observations, 92 or so was the start of the major decline. They were damn good cues for a long time. I have played with some damn fine Meuccis from the 70's and 80's. There are gems from the 90's and 2000's as well, and they still play well, but they are simply not the norm, and their name is ruined when you compare them to the cues they used to be, or the other respected high quality production cues being made today.

Kelly

I have owned a couple of meuccis and they are the newer ones and I agree, they do not play as well as the older ones. My friend has one that was from the late 70s, very early 60s and it plays pretty well, needs some refinishing, but not bad.

As for the newer ones, I have had experience with ordering one (before I discovered some of the local custom cue makers) and they told me 1 month, then 1 month past and it was 6 months, and then a year and finally I got my money back and picked up a Mike Webb and would never go back.

Personal preference is fine. If someone loves the way Meucci plays that is fine, I could care less. Me, I would not be caught dead owning or buying a new one, and yes it is based on my track record with that company. The ones do look cheap and the hit of the cue is not the same.

As far as them moving out overseas, no kidding. It is no surprise, cheaper labor, cheaper materials, and a different audience to market to. Apparently, they must think that they have more opportunity to make money overseas then in the US.
 
Russ Chewning said:
I might push that out a year or two.. 1994-195 seemed to be when Meucci was making the "Maximum" series, with the unvarnished wrap.

I really liked those cues, and actually recently found the exact model and color Meucci Maximum that I have been looking for for over a year.

The auction says it is older dealer stock, never played with, and I know I payed too much for it, but at this point, it's a matter of getting the same basic cue I learned to really play with, so it was worth it.

Russ

1994 may be more accurate. I was playing with my It's George by 92, and a couple of years after that was when I personally noticed the decline. I sold one of the sweetest hitting Meucci I have run across, excluding my father's Hubbart, to a friend I think in 93. It wasn't brand new then, and I remember regretting selling it when I noticed the quality of the cues dropping, so that timeframe is when I attributed some of the changes starting.

The unmarked Meucci sneakies sure did hit fine.

Kelly
 
itmc80 said:
My friend has one that was from the late 70s, very early 60s and it plays pretty well, needs some refinishing, but not bad.

Sorry about that I mean very early 80s, not 60s
 
hondo said:
LOL1 If a tree falls in the woods & nobody hears it... .
If you buy a Meucci & it plays good before everybody tells
you how bad it is, does it quit playing good?
The same thing happened to me with Dale Perry.
I bought 2 & thought they played great. Then I come on
here & it is explained to me how bad they are.
I wonder what I could have been thinking!:rolleyes: :rolleyes:

You seem to be a bit defensive. If you like the way your cues play, good all over you, they probably play quite fine. Nobody has said every Meucci ever made plays bad. Nobody has suggested you should change your taste or throw away your cues.

The thread is about them moving overseas, and about the decline of what once was the premier name in cues. There were many pro players using Meccui cues for a long time. Bob Meucci knew how to make a great cue and really knew how to market them. The popularity and production outran their quality control. They were making so many cues, the individual products and their customer service suffered. The reputation started to suffer. Instead of tightening the quality control, they started putting more plastics into the cues, and Bob started touting machines that showed why dots on shafts made the cues play better. Then there was the power piston, and another colored dot. Then there was a partial bankruptcy.

The problems with many of the cues straight out of the box, the problems with customer service, including loss of cues and money from customers (some people resorted to catching up with Bob personally at a cue show), and the fact that many long time dealers of the cues had to completely stop selling the cues is a matter of record.

Kelly
 
poopi

A friend that has been selling cues in a retail environment told me
that he stopped carrying Meucci because seven out of ten had
to be sent back and they couldn't fill the orders because they
had too much repair work. I forget the number but it was something
like 70:30% repair to production ratio. This was a year ago or better.
IMO, their quality control can't get much worse.

I always think of meucci when I read the threads about current cue
makers moving into the ranks of GB and the Szams. The old Meuccis
have probably lost a lot of value now and the same thing can happen
to just about anyone. DP comes to mind.
 
At one time, almost every top professional was using Meucii.
Varner, Rempe, Strickland, Loree Jon Jones,David Howard..i think they had like 30 pros

too bad they went downhill so fast in the late 90's
 
3andstop said:
With all respect. In the 45+ yrs I've been playing this game, I think I may have played with every brand cue ever made. That doesn't mean I had to buy them to play with them. :) One of the hugest differences you can realize in any cue's hit can be obtained by simply changing tips and tapers.

My buddy has a Southwest he uses when we play straight pool. Shoot, I've had him close to wrapping it around a lolly column in his basement many times. :) I've played with his cue many times also. Its nice, it would take additional time to get used to, but lets face it, ALL cues play differently and that may or may not be better or worse, just differently.

He's a fanatic about his cues, tips and just about every facet of his play. He's very serious and very good. It just isn't my thing, and to be honest, I didn't like the way his cue played. Primarily because I'm so used to mine I'm sure. If I played with it for a month or so, I'd most likely think differently about it also. One thing I know for sure, I'd never waste (IMO) 1600 bucks on one. If I weren't retired on a fixed income, and I had a ton of money in the bank, I'd spend it on a thousand other things rather than an expensive cue.

My point is that its been my experience most people who spend big bucks (that more than 2 or 3 hundred 3andstop dollars :) ) are more into prestige and collecting. There is nothing wrong with any hobby any person has, its saying the others are junk that is inaccurate. They aren't junk, they just aren't anything special.

When I look at the workmanship in my cues I see all of 250 bucks. :) When I think about support, hmm .. this isn't a high end software we're talking about. This is two pieces of wood screwed together with a tip that's glued on. No batteries, no moving parts, no need for support IMO. :)

In the end, to each his own. I just kind of dislike hearing any (not just meucci) but any lower end stick called junk. Shoot, Viking, McDermott, even Lucasi and Player cues will play just fine with a tad of personalized tweaking like taper and tip.

**edit
I will admit I have not in recent years actually played with a newer meucci, but I can't imagine it much worse than the other lower end cues I mentioned.
The fact that you may have the ability to beat some people you know who have expensive cues really has no bearing on the fact that there IS a difference between production and custom cues. I get the fact that that you don't care cause you don't need 'em. To state that the only difference between a production cue and a true custom is just cosmetics and the owners vanity is wrong.

A great player can play with virtually anything. Earl with a Cuetech, Thorsten Hohman is playing with a Lucasi, Buddy Hall played with one also for years. But, they are Paid to use those cues. When is the last time a pro lost a deal and kept playing with the cue because it hit so good?

I also disagree that Players and Lucasi are anywhere near the same class as Viking and McDermott. The former are junk in my opinion, while the latter have a well earned reputation for quality and service. As for not caring about service, I think that would change if 4 days after you bought your $250 cue the joint pin started wobbling, the shaft warped, or the cue cracked at the joint while you were breaking. I have personally seen or experienced all of these things.

It's like saying a Kia and a Ferrari are the same thing. They both can get you to the store. If you don't think there is difference thats fine.
 
teebee said:
It is hard to admit on this forum that you own meucci cues and worse yet really like them. I am guilty of both. I bought mine before becoming a member here and really like them. The are nice looking , straight and seem to play well (I am Not a good player).

I'm a proud owner of one. :p Too proud that I don't use it [no sarcasm on this one]. I ended using a Mike Sigel signature cue. I have no idea what brand it is, but it hits good. Wrapping is lose now though.

QUESTION: My Mike Sigel cue has 2 joints, is there a reason for it?

NOTE: If you think those Mike Sigel cues are bad, please don't rub it on me. I bought the cue when Efren still listed Mike Sigel as his favorite player. :D
 
Last edited:
JCIN said:
The fact that you may have the ability to beat some people you know who have expensive cues really has no bearing on the fact that there IS a difference between production and custom cues. I get the fact that that you don't care cause you don't need 'em. To state that the only difference between a production cue and a true custom is just cosmetics and the owners vanity is wrong.

A great player can play with virtually anything. Earl with a Cuetech, Thorsten Hohman is playing with a Lucasi, Buddy Hall played with one also for years. But, they are Paid to use those cues. When is the last time a pro lost a deal and kept playing with the cue because it hit so good?

I also disagree that Players and Lucasi are anywhere near the same class as Viking and McDermott. The former are junk in my opinion, while the latter have a well earned reputation for quality and service. As for not caring about service, I think that would change if 4 days after you bought your $250 cue the joint pin started wobbling, the shaft warped, or the cue cracked at the joint while you were breaking. I have personally seen or experienced all of these things.

It's like saying a Kia and a Ferrari are the same thing. They both can get you to the store. If you don't think there is difference thats fine.


You and I are both entitled to our opinions. I said more than once that ALL cues differ. Absolutely there is a difference between production and custom made cues. So we obviously agree there. Whether the difference is good or bad, important or not, is a matter of personal preference and maybe a touch of hypnosis and marketing. :)

I should have been more specific when I said the differences were cosmetic. Sure quality, fit and finish of custom cues are far better than production cues. You are also paying thousands more for that. None of that has a bit to do with playing pool IMO so long as they are not falling apart.

Yes, many times production lower end cues don't feel so good right out of the wrapper, but that isn't a 2000 dollar issue. A lot of what we feel in these cues is based on what we are used to in the cue we currently play with. I also agree with you that Viking and McDermott are much better cues than Lucasi or Player. I base that judgment on the fact that the former feel much more like what I'm used to, but they are all production cues and the higher their prices the more inlays they have, not the better they play.

I mentioned that these lower end cues could be made to play much better with a personalized change of tip and the shaft taper. Maybe even an entire shaft replacement. Never the less, this is not a huge dollar issue.

They are made of wood. Rock maple for the most part on the shafts. The craftsmanship is in the butt for the most part. Yes they play differently, yes they feel differently from each other, but one high end cue feels differently from another high end cue also. What does that mean?

I think Byrne said something like, if you put a good tip on a broomstick you could play a good game of pool and sweep the floors afterwards. Now that may be an exaggeration, but the point is you simply don't need to spend thousands of dollars on a cue stick to get something perfectly fine to play pool with.

I think that holds true even more so for intermediate players. IMO they get all this squirt, squat, deflection and whatever else in their heads and its going to be more difficult to concentrate on hitting the ball where there's a hole.

I used to smile listening to some of the players that came into my room and spread their sticks out over the table then one by one hit balls trying to make the cue ball spin in place. Ridiculous IMO. If you blindfolded them and replaced the tips on those sticks, they would think they were testing a whole different group of sticks. :) Its like getting together and trying to determine what's better, vanilla or chocolate ice cream.

Of course there comes a level of cheapness that is unacceptable. Wide grain woods, screw on tips, and those 12 piece cues that fit into a 6" long case are good examples.

There is quite a good portion of this game that is mental. If spending money on some exotic stick makes one feel better, and that subsequently makes them play better, then the value of a custom cue stick goes beyond cosmetics and hand made craftsmanship for that person and tangable value may be realized in their game from it. That's the hypnotic value.

Shoot, there's a ton of sneaky pete sticks out there that play every bit as good as these multi thousand dollar art works and they cost below 300 bucks commonly. In fact most of the custom sneaky petes use the same damned shafts as the companies 5000 dollar cue.

This thread has gotten me very curious about the newer meucci sticks as I have not seen one for at least 15 yrs. I will be on the lookout to see just how bad they are these days.

My point is not to have new players or even advanced player bull#$#ed into thinking they need to spend 1500 to 2500 to get a cue stick thats worth playing with. I'll go to my grave believing you don't need to spend any more than 300 bucks TOPs to find a stick with as good a play as any stick made.

Again, if Meucci went down the toilet so badly that they fall apart out of the wrapper, then so be it, that would be a valid reason not to buy one. I don't know cause I've never seen the new ones, mine play great for me. There are a number of alternatives in the same price range that will be absolutely fine to play with. **edit One bit of advice for anyone who is buying a cue. Never do it over the internet without holding it and hitting a few balls with it if possible. (even if you are not allowed to chalk it)

If you collect cues then thats another story all together. If you have the money and enjoy showing off other peoples fine works of art, then thats another story as well. If you want to play with a unique cue for the sake of it being unique, thats ok too. You just don't need to to run balls.
 
Last edited:
Back
Top