ibuycues said:Well, I got it, and am very pleased with the acquisition!!!
It won`t be fun selling my car and riding a bicycle for the forseeable future, but I am glad I made the purchase.
Hey Will,
Maybe the bicycle part is a little exaggerated..
The CEO strikes again.. Who's the greatest now...
Great Job,
Ken
highendcues
rayjay said:Wow! Amazing auction and purchase, Will! Congratulations on your buy, I think you made a good investment on a magnificient cue. I'd love to see photos of your entire collection someday!![]()
skins said:with all respect to you, in an art sense this cue "flows" in every way. the veneer thickness compared to the box dimensions are very nice. the gaps between the boxes as well as the size change between them in the forearm are very pleasing to the eye. the addition of the diamond and dots round out the forearm canvas and the size and placement of the diamonds and dots are crucial to getting this to look right, which was accomplished imo. the relationship is just as nice in the sleeve. the arrangement of the dots and diamonds as well as the distance separating them show perfect composition and continue the theme from the forearm imo. the different ring work that exists through the cue work separates the four distinct parts of the cue, the joint from the forearm, from the wrap, and from the sleeve. this keeps the work interesting and makes me know that Gus had a great eye for taking different elements and putting them together to make one great "form".
The Beginner said:and the winner is!!!!!!....WILL *THE CUE BOX GUY**** (((((APPLAUSE)))....
IM JUST CURIOUS WHO IS THE BIDDER 15.....i don't see him bid there and suddenly he bid 55K ....hmmmmmmmm
Cuaba said:I'm impressed that this cue actually brought $55.1K on eBay. I assume that the pics sold it, and no bidder actually looked at the cue in person?
As someone who has owned many Gus Szamboti cues, I'd like to make a few comments:
The butt looks totally original, and the design is fantastic. The frosting around the inlays & veneers is typical for Gus's original finish after 20+ years. The "MADE BY GUS SZAMBOTI" inscription is a huge plus, something I've never seen on a Gus box cue. And having the original owner's name on the cue makes it easy to trace in Gus's order book (which Barry has.) I assume the final bidders checked this out?
My only concern after studying the pics is the length of the shafts. Every Gus I've ever had has had shafts that are equal in length to the butt. On this cue, the shafts are about 1/2" inch shorter than the butt if you study the pics.
Also, the ferrules are much whiter than the joint. If they are the same age, they should be the same color. If they are not ivory, they are almost certainly not original. If they are ivory, they may have been replaced?
There is the chance that the shafts were shortened, and the ferrules were replaced. I hope this isn't the case. This could be determined by a personal inspection by Barry. Or the original order book should state the original length of the cue.
I think its a $75K+ cue in a retail environment, totally original, with provenance (more if someone really wants it.) If the shafts have been alterred, its still a good buy at $55K.
Congrats to Will. This is a Gus box cue that will be hard to top. And it will certainly be worth a fortune in the future.
thediamond said:I echo these words. I have a Gus with mismatched shafts also...two Gus shafts, just one of them is off another cue.