I was checking on cue sports being included in the Olympics here on the forum. A search resulted in 20 threads! One thread was of great interest to me and here is a link to it below. Based on this post and other BCA drama. I had to ask myself WHO is CURRENTLY leading the push for cue sports in the Olympics??? Short answer seems to be no one based on my assessment. To be so close based on the post and walk away from inclusion in the Olympics due to a refusal to add 2 players to the board is more than an OUTRAGE!!! I put a copy of the post below for anyone interested. Seems the BCA dissolved when it sold the league and dropped the Olympic campaign. How does the INDUSTRY pick up the pieces is the whole point of my post and the question I have for those in the industry? Form another BCA? Reform the BCA? Please note the date of this post below is 5/11/2004 and 10 years of inaction is 10 years too many in my opinion.
The BCA really hurt the pro players who would have benefited from the inclusion of cue sports by the United States Olympic Committee. Upon inclusion then pro players would have been eligible for Olympic funding! Funding to train and funding to attend international events. Not to mention the boost in exposure of cue sports world wide. Seems to me greed and dollar signs from the sale of the league, lead to abandoning the non-profit origins and adopting a for profit posture based on the economic success of the league. Pro pool players and Olympic dreams be damned.
Sincerely,
KD
http://forums.azbilliards.com/showpost.php?p=44731&postcount=8
The BCA really hurt the pro players who would have benefited from the inclusion of cue sports by the United States Olympic Committee. Upon inclusion then pro players would have been eligible for Olympic funding! Funding to train and funding to attend international events. Not to mention the boost in exposure of cue sports world wide. Seems to me greed and dollar signs from the sale of the league, lead to abandoning the non-profit origins and adopting a for profit posture based on the economic success of the league. Pro pool players and Olympic dreams be damned.
Sincerely,
KD
http://forums.azbilliards.com/showpost.php?p=44731&postcount=8
For a number of years the BCA has worked to get the U. S. Olympic Committe to recognize them as the sanctioning body for pool players in the US. The WPA achieved OAC recognition of pool as a sport about 5 years ago.
For the BCA to be recognized by the USOC they would be required to put two professional player on the BCA Board of Directors. Thought the BCA made moves to do that they failed to enact those requirements into reality. The "Trade Association" did not want player input (votes) on the board. The USOC gave up on wait for the BCA to comply and told the board that the could reaply for consideration in 2007 if the Players were on the board. The BCA counter acted all inclusion of players being on the BCA Board of Directors and promtply put the BCA pool league up for sale.
The USOC will only recognize a non-profit organization that represents pool players and abides by the WPA rules, hence a partial reason for the formation of the new ACS (America CueSports) [see their web site for details]. If the ACS can show compliance to the USOC within two years we have a shot at inclusion into the Pan-Am Games in 2006 which is the next step in getting to the Olympics. Inclusion in the Pan -Am games also releases USOC funds for teaching and training US Olympic hopefuls in their sport.