I suspect that there is some truth here, seems with the exception of the tighter pockets on today's Diamond tables the players might have it a wee bit easier that the 'old guard' did back in the day. Today's equipment is so much better and easier to play on, (again with exception of the aforementioned pockets specs) with the today's cloth, carbon fiber shafts, templets that rack the balls snot tight etc. I remember seeing a lot of dry breaks back in the day even with the one on the spot and the breaker breaking anywhere in the kitchen because of the old wooden racks they were using that always seemed to cause problems getting the balls tight. Many a time did I see players pounding the balls in the rack under the watchful eye of Scott Smith and they still came up dry on the break. So yes I think it was a tougher game back then but I also agree that it's impossible to cross compare generations of pool players. I'm not saying that today's players are worse than yesterday's players or visa versa. Probably like the poster said if you could fast forward a 30 year old Nick or Earl to 2023 give a little time to adjust to today's equipment they might be just as good in today's battlefield. All this being said, let's just savor the memories of our legends and enjoy the spectacular players of today as well!The equipment has made the 2 different generations not really comparable. Slower cloth and cushions, inconsistent balls and racks and shaft technology have all made for this.
Would a player from the 90s ever in 1 million years take a touchy table length cut, cue ball is 3” off the rail, high right, 3 rail position on the 9? Hell no, so why ever practice it? Skid, throw, humidity, cloth that wasn’t necessarily new for the tournament, your opponent is smoking, bad lighting… Longer shots with funny position were an automatic safe for most mortals that were born on planet earth.
That shot while very tough, is much more routine today because it takes MUCH less stroke these days to pull off. Having to stroke a long shot with worse conditions makes for a harder game than fantastic equipment but tight pockets. Super stupid high right fire it in is now high right with medium speed.
Go to a 5” pocket table with bar room cloth and shit lighting and fire in 10 long cut stroke shots and see how many you make. Now go to a 4 1/4” modern table and led lights and try for the same position. If I had to make that shot in 1 try or have Santiago beat my knee in with a claw hammer, I know which table I’m taking and which table I’m saying F all that to. And todays top pros would likely say the same thing.
Modern players shoot longer shots more routinely because inarguably, it takes less skill to get position from far away than it used be so they get more practice at it. They aren’t automatic safetys like they used to be.
Give prime Nick 3 months of practice on a blue label Diamond with modern equipment and YouTube access and I can promise you, nobody would like ANY of it. He would give any top pro all they could handle. He may only need 1 piece of gum.
The game is apples to oranges now.
Mosconi and Crane both hold the record of 309 on a 10' table. It seems to me the pockets on those old tables were pretty tight, but I don't recall exactly where I read that. Does anybody here know?I suspect that there is some truth here, seems with the exception of the tighter pockets on today's Diamond tables the players might have it a wee bit easier that the 'old guard' did back in the day. Today's equipment is so much better and easier to play on, (again with exception of the aforementioned pockets specs) with the today's cloth, carbon fiber shafts, templets that rack the balls snot tight etc.
ill second this. in this video i didnt see efren gain and hold the line position , never seen the whole game but you know what i mean,Counterexample to your point: Efren playing balkline...
Efren is a legend in pool, but I estimate that there are thousands of players that he couldn't hang with playing straight rail, one rail, balkline, and three cushion...in large part just because he hasn't developed the mechanics for carom billiards.
ill second this. in this video i didnt see efren gain and hold the line position , never seen the whole game but you know what i mean,
i have seen him get beaten by a viet 3c player in a 1band final by a large margin , he didnt make 10 points
ive always wanted to see all the carom players and rooms in the phillipines that they speak of because i love the game.but never seen a video or photo but there are claims of big carom championships in several disciplines from efrens country and many many players.
cant recall one pinnoy in international tournaments in all that ive scowered over the yrs
other than the big south asian carom tournaments
you lucky dog! i was born on the wrong side of the worldI showed this video to Willy Gérimont a few weeks ago...he came to our club to give a two day seminar. He was not too impressed.
He didn't mention the Philippines, but he said the carom scene in Vietnam is insane.
They were most likely 4 3/4", fairly tight by the standards of those times, but not by ours.Mosconi and Crane both hold the record of 309 on a 10' table. It seems to me the pockets on those old tables were pretty tight, but I don't recall exactly where I read that. Does anybody here know?
I'm a native Houstonian, just like you, amigo. I was lucky to get my goofy butt to France to finish my schooling and work for a while.you lucky dog! i was born on the wrong side of the world
willy is great, and probably an awesome guy to know
he recently went with xavier over there for some training and exhibitions, seen xavier posting it
yes vietnam and korea carom is large and in charge
Absolutely right, and it's the fault tournament directors and referees, who have done far too little to do something about it for years. I'd suggest that two thirds of the players have slow pre-shot routines these days.The majority of today's players play considerably slower.
That sounds too good to pass up I need to make plansI'm a native Houstonian, just like you, amigo. I was lucky to get my goofy butt to France to finish my schooling and work for a while.
I'm here for another year, so let me know if you want to come out for a week and play some billiards out here. I have an extra mattress.
Willy is a cool dude, and his knowledge is incredible. One thing that really impressed me that weekend was that the best player in Lyon, Fabio Venditelli, who is a master in multiple disciplines and older than Willy and friends with him, participated as a student in the seminar. It was a lot of fun.
Start working on your French, panocha breath. lolThat sounds too good to pass up I need to make plans
I remember reading about that 309 number reached by both Crane and Mosconi. As I recall Willie ran the 309 only to find out that Irving had already reached that number. I have no idea how big the pockets were on that table.Mosconi and Crane both hold the record of 309 on a 10' table. It seems to me the pockets on those old tables were pretty tight, but I don't recall exactly where I read that. Does anybody here know?
The majority of today's players play considerably slower.
I'm a native Houstonian, just like you, amigo. I was lucky to get my goofy butt to France to finish my schooling and work for a while.
I'm here for another year, so let me know if you want to come out for a week and play some billiards out here. I have an extra mattress.
Willy is a cool dude, and his knowledge is incredible. One thing that really impressed me that weekend was that the best player in Lyon, Fabio Venditelli, who is a master in multiple disciplines and older than Willy and friends with him, participated as a student in the seminar. It was a lot of fun.
Darn right. Greatness is and will always be measured in titles.
Agreed 100%. Well said.I would put another side to this, greatness may not always be equal to outright skill at whatever the player is doing. I think that during some commentary that Incardona did (and we all would agree he was a sharp guy that knew what he was talking about) he said that there are some players that have the best "stuff" but don't end up winning as much as others, he used a baseball analogy to baseball pitchers. I think maybe they were talking about Bustie or somebody like that, when they were talking about talent and skill that did not come out into as many tournaments wins as you would think they had.
I don’t think McCready’s mechanics were bad….I judge a player by watching the CUE between his bridge hand and the cue ball….Keith rang all the bells.Keith McCready has/had the worst mechanics of just about every top player ever.
But he sure made it work for him.
I don’t think McCready’s mechanics were bad….I judge a player by watching the CUE between his bridge hand and the cue ball….Keith rang all the bells.
The reality of every shot is you must hit the cue ball with the cue. So if you take care of that, you will have success.His results were good. His mechanics were bad. There is a difference between the two. It goes to one of the sayings I use when I explain stance and bridge, etc.. to players that are learning, "you want to play good because of your mechanics not in spite of them". He had good results in spite of being in an awkward position when shooting that would make 99% of all players max out at a C or B level. Bustie, Hopkins, Kennedy, a few others, all had quicks in their mechanics that every pool instructor would try to weed out of a student, yet it worked for those players as a final result. It's like the called pocket rules, you can either make it in directly as intended, or you can miss, have the ball go 3 rails and still go in the pocket you called. Both ways are counted as a made ball, only one of them was the "correct" way to make it. Which of the two ways do we practice when trying to make a ball (and I mean normal play not banks or some specialty shot for those that try to be technical LOL)?