I'd rather just know how to play top speed pool. If that would mean running racks without any clue as to how I'm technically doing it, so be it.
Well all i can say is that your alot diff from all the pros that I have played and hung around. But on the other hand they probably don't really know what they are doing or why. .
That's an understatement, you know a lot of the same champions that influenced me, like Vernon Elliot, Tony Fargo, and "Bugs". Don't you think it's funny when someone says they use "science" to play pool? That's like someone saying they use "science" to walk down a flight of stairs. What would Vernon Elliot say about all this? LoL :frown:
Can you imagine learning to draw, paint or play music "by science". Sure we have to understand the proper techniques used by champion players, however at some point it must be done subconsciously, so we can tap into our subconscious potential.....or quit playing and take up video pool.
Let's using walking down the stairs as an example:
"first I see where my foot would naturally land, then I look at the stair, then I calculate the angle my foot must land to stay balanced, then I distribute my weight with 80% on my back foot until the moment of landing on the step, and my weight shifts to the foot contacting the floor............no wonder the game is so difficult to play, the game should be a way to express yourself, not a science exam.
Be patient, John, you will see some responses that will make your head spin. I'd recommend not taking them too seriously, or you'll have trouble making a "cross side," with "ball in hand."![]()
Neither does the cball or oball:thumbup: John B.
OK I think someone needs to define science when applied to pool. Maybe thats why I can't get any better because when I am shooting the one ball with 8 other balls on the table. I am thinking about a lot of things. Do I think about how long the tip stays in contact with the cue ball after contact. No it's just info that may be interesting to some. Science goes into the equipment we use and play on. So when someone decides to play high right instead of high left. Is that applying science? Is it conscious or subconscious?
OK I think someone needs to define science when applied to pool. Maybe thats why I can't get any better because when I am shooting the one ball with 8 other balls on the table. I am thinking about a lot of things. Do I think about how long the tip stays in contact with the cue ball after contact. No it's just info that may be interesting to some. Science goes into the equipment we use and play on. So when someone decides to play high right instead of high left. Is that applying science? Is it conscious or subconscious?
I would refer to that last part as knowledge not science. Science and playing good pool go together about as well as water and oil.IMO they don't mix well. John B.
OK I think someone needs to define science when applied to pool. Maybe thats why I can't get any better because when I am shooting the one ball with 8 other balls on the table. I am thinking about a lot of things. Do I think about how long the tip stays in contact with the cue ball after contact. No it's just info that may be interesting to some. Science goes into the equipment we use and play on. So when someone decides to play high right instead of high left. Is that applying science? Is it conscious or subconscious?
Science is not the correct term, it's actually linked to philosophy*. Physics, pursuit of knowledge, and/or Geometry are a better choice of wording.
*
Ever since classical antiquity, science as a type of knowledge has been closely linked to philosophy. During the Islamic Golden Age,[2] the foundation for the scientific method was laid, which emphasized experimental data and reproducibility of its results.[nb 2] In the West during the early modern period the words "science" and "philosophy of nature" were sometimes used interchangeably,[3].3 and until the 17th century natural philosophy (which is today called "natural science") was considered a separate branch of philosophy in the West.[4]
Physics..............................hard to argue with gravity.:grin:
Obviously, I (and many others on AZB) would like to have both ... a complete and solid understanding and/or intuition of all important pool principles and techniques AND the world-class skill required to apply the knowledge and intuition to the fullest extent.Would you rather know all the science that is involved in a pool shot or would you just rather know how to play top speed pool? Yes or no would be fine. Thanks,John B.
Obviously, I (and many others on AZB) would like to have both ... a complete and solid understanding and/or intuition of all important pool principles and techniques AND the world-class skill required to apply the knowledge and intuition to the fullest extent.
For those interested, the following pages have lots of good arguments from past discussions on this topic (which has been revisited countless times over countless years):
knowledge can be useful, but you still need skill
physics "understanding" sometimes provides useful insight
technical knowledge is not enough
what it take to play like a pro (at the bottom of the page)
Enjoy,
Dave
Be a student of the game.....it deserves the respect.....play and learn
Science is a wonderful thing but if John tells me a rooster can tote a bale of cotton the only thing I'm going to do is figure out where I want the cotton!
Hu
On the table -- enough to make balls
Off the table -- the science of it all gets more interesting.
Mostly I just want to play better.