Shane was born in 1983. He was 19-21 from 2002-2004. During this time he was a really good up and comer. He was winning regional bar table tournaments and starting to beat some good players gambling. In 2005 he finished 25-33rd at the US Open.
Two years later, at the age of 24, he beat Corey in a race to 100. He then won the US Open. 2007 was his break through year.
It is hard to say he didn't increase his overall performance between 2007 and 2012. He gained experience and his moving game and mental game both grew stronger and stronger.
So I'd say he had several big break throughs between 21 and 30. I think the 30 year old SVB could spot the 21 year old SVB quite a bit. I could say the same about Chang, Soquet, Shaw, and quite a few others.
I don't disagree with the idea that it is hard to plateau at one level and grind to the top of pool, but there are exception cases all over.
I absolutely mean it and not looking for attention. To each his or her ownI assume you do not really mean what you said in this comment and it was meant more for attention. Can you name one top tier player that played their best at 19-21? Shane, Sky, Earl, Johnny, Sigel, Buddy?? None of them. That was a ridiculous comment
And Jose Parica, who was the top ranked player on the Camel Tour at the age of 49.There's also Efren who really caught a gear in the 2000s when he turned 46.
2004-2007 and 2014 1P Champion
2001 Tokyo Open
2004 World 8 Ball
2005 All Japan Championship
Sky was referring to the match with Dennis that he won.I'm just an old country boy and easily confused by this big city stuff so I'll ask again. How is the loser "still owed from the match"? How did he make money while losing? Did he get a slice of the PPV? Was he supposed to get a walking stick?
Shane has another 15 years as a world class player. He's so in tune with the modern equipment. Unless that drastically changed or he has health issues...he's our alpha dog.Just curious what you and others may think. Jay Helfert said one time in a National Billiards Newsletter that every player his a peak, some lasting longer than others. What do you think of Shane's peak? Is he at the top of his game today and holding on strong, still climbing to a higher level, or maybe starting to dwindle a little?
At 21 you have no respect for money which allows you to play fearlessly. I think a players best game is after 25.Shane was born in 1983. He was 19-21 from 2002-2004. During this time he was a really good up and comer. He was winning regional bar table tournaments and starting to beat some good players gambling. In 2005 he finished 25-33rd at the US Open.
Two years later, at the age of 24, he beat Corey in a race to 100. He then won the US Open. 2007 was his break through year.
It is hard to say he didn't increase his overall performance between 2007 and 2012. He gained experience and his moving game and mental game both grew stronger and stronger.
So I'd say he had several big break throughs between 21 and 30. I think the 30 year old SVB could spot the 21 year old SVB quite a bit. I could say the same about Chang, Soquet, Shaw, and quite a few others.
I don't disagree with the idea that it is hard to plateau at one level and grind to the top of pool, but there are exception cases all over.
Say whatShane has another 15 years as a world class player. He's so in tune with the modern equipment. Unless that drastically changed or he has health issues...he's our alpha dog.
Hahahaha! I thought it was about time to have a dog picture in the thread.Say what![]()
My strong personal opinion is a player’s peak is at age 19-21.
I don’t think players improve past that for physical reasons.
I think genetics is the limiting factor of how strong a player can become.
Its not a popular opinion here, but it’s mine![]()
It's an interesting thought shared by iusedtoberich. In Keith's case, he started playing pool really young and due to family difficulties, he ended up living, literally, in the pool room as a kid, sleeping under the tables at night. He lived and breathed pool. Players like Cole Dickson, Larry Lisciotti, and Jimmy Reid were his mentors, family, and best friends. When Keith was 19 or 20, he was approaching his peak for sure.Kieth Mc might be the exception......wonder what his opinion is
Screw it.Looser refitting is bad. Needs to be tight.
I’ve heard a number of players say their shotmaking was at its peak when they were that young. So maybe execution peaks at a young age. But their results on the table don’t bear this out.My strong personal opinion is a player’s peak is at age 19-21.
I don’t think players improve past that for physical reasons.
I think genetics is the limiting factor of how strong a player can become.
Its not a popular opinion here, but it’s mine![]()
I haven't read all of this but one thing I thought was part of the match between sky/shane was that if Sky lost the mullet would need to go.Well, all's well that ends well. Sky's wife posted a photo of Sky's new hairdo sans the mullet. Sky is looking great, by the way, with his new look. Shane posted on the thread with a funny post. Whatever happened, it's squashed. Shane and Sky are both in Texas now at the Skinny Bob's pool room. What a collection of pool greats at this event. Too many to name, but here a stab at a few that I remember seeing in the photo: Shane, Sky, Jeremy, Omar, Corey, Mika, Chris Reinhold, Chip Compton, Tony Chohan, Billy Thorpe, Alex Pagulayan, Naoyuki Oi, Roberto Gomez, Scott Frost, John Morra, Warren Kiamco, just to name a few.
Now we're in the driver's seat to win the Mosconi Cup with Shane and Sky leading the way.
View attachment 607591