I am going to make ONE exception and respond to you only...until you ban me again, of course.
Mr. Wilson said:
Let's objectify this a little more.
There is nothing about your disdain for me that is objective, which is why I have chosen not to contribute to forums that you moderate.
You also neglect to mention that none of his polls are an attack on you in any fashion. That same cannot be said regarding your poll, can it?
You took an opportunity to try and play moderator by posting an inflamatory thread directed at him. I gave you bad rep and expressed my displeasure at your attempts to fan the flames.
I took no opportunity to "play moderator." As moderator, do you post polls to solicit opinions on the propriety of members posts?
I had an OPINION that LWW was spamming the thread by posting TEN separate polls IN A ROW and instead of duplicating that childish and disruptive behavior by STATING THAT OPINION in EACH of his TEN polls, I elected not to FURTHER DISRUPT THE FORUM and instead chose to express that OPINION in a single Poll and asking for OTHER OPINIONS.
Has it occurred to you that the VOTE could have been enormously AGAINST my OPINION??
If fact, however, the poll now stands at 21-20 so it is clear that a substantial percentage of other members AGREE with me.
As for "personal attacks" my Poll was absolutely NOT a "personal attack" in that it was UTTERLY impersonal and rather merely was an OPINION in objection to a SINGLE element of LWW's posting history. The poll wasn't even SLIGHTLY "personal."
If you had bothered to review the threads, you will see that I have agreed with LWW on a number of issues...and vice versa.
But given your sensitivity to personal attacks...did you happen to see these from him directed to other members???
Are you that desperate that all you have is bull shiite attacks?
LWW
Then stop being a nutjob and defending the lie.
LWW
WOW!
Ignorant of history, oblivious to the truth, and a supporter of mass murder all in one.
LWW
Poor PJ.
He isn't happy unless he has an enemy of the day.
LWW
This last one is not a "personal attack" but rather just demonstrates how preposterous his statements often are...which is why I, along with others, find the need to respond to him in less than sweet and loving terms.
The root answer is that whites have been in the majority since shortly after Plymouth Rock was set foot upon.
YO LWW...have you ever heard of Native Americans????? LOL
He also has SCORES of posts to the effect that Joseph McCarthy was a GREAT AMERICAN HERO!!!!
You were not even given an official warning, but it was still enough to make you cry that rep was not "green".
Well, if bad rep is no big deal in your mind, then why did you GIVE it just because I did and asked others if they agreed with me???
What is OBJECTIVE about that?
What I cannot stomach is all the whiney drama.
Well then you must chew up a LOT of Rolaids...or possibly you rarely monitor the NPR forum which is PRIMARILY DRAMA....heated....emotionally charged DRAMA! So..YET AGAIN...you single me out for posing "whiney drama" in the MIDST OF AN AVALANCE OF WHINEY DRAMA!
I will add, that it appears you take a certain amount of pride in having gone around me to come back to AZB. You have posted these little tidbits on regular intervals.....and yet you wonder.

[/
Well, the appeal process is a revered American concept. Of course, being overruled on appeal is never comfortable for the one whose decision was JUDGED to be in error.
You do plenty of judging but now YOU whine about being judged! As you once adviced me when I complained to you about the PERSONAL ATTACKS lodged against me...including in THIS VERY THREAD....you need to "cowboy up" and not YET AGAIN single me out for doing NO MORE than was done to them.
If you are going to be OBJECTIVE...then you would HAVE to give Bad Rep to oh....about 50 posters on NPR....have you?
Could it be that the virtually daily accumulation of green REP that I receive...and for which I am flattered and grateful and which has risen to over 12,000 points in spite of your bad rep bomb...just bugs you??
Again...this is not a return to being a contributing member of the forum which I don't intend to do unless you agree that I can ban you if I decide to pitch a hissy fit about your conduct here...as you can and have done to me...TWICE.
Rather, this is merely an ad hoc and
objective response to your comments about me.
Regards,
Jim