I read one post that said if Balukas has kept playing she would be considered the best. Well, she DID quit playing and I think it was part her attitude that was her downfall.
When Balukas was playing the competition was nothing like it is now for the women. Of course, this is just my opinion. I respect everyone else's also.
I think the type in bold is exactly why she acted they way that she did. She wanted to play with the men and not just the women. I feel she wanted to eat them all up because deep down her game was on the level of a ice pic murderer!! She takes no prisoners and she doesn't hold back. Then she had a problem with a dress code and other issues such as being fined stated below.....
In August 1987, at the annual B.C. Classic hosted at a Holiday Inn in Binghamton, New York, Balukas was slated for competition in both divisions. After arriving, she discovered that for evening-scheduled matches she would be required to wear formal attire that she did not have with her. The men's division, by contrast, had no similar dress code. Balukas took a stand that the women should not be treated differently than the men, and accordingly refused to procure garments that would meet the unequal mandate.
The women held a vote as to whether Balukas should be allowed to play. She later explained that "what hurt at Binghamton was that while I was trying to stand up for us being treated the same as men, the other girls held the tournament draw without me. By one vote, they kept me out. And some of the girls who are my best friends voted against me."
Yeah that bold bit right there... Would make me quit playing pool too. She was a trailblazer and nobody had her back when she really need them. I stand behind what she did by keeping her integrity intact. :thumbup2: