Makes a lot of sense to me. The bottom line, though, is MONEY. Money talks and BS walks, as they say.
Aside from the political problems that the UPA may have endured from its inception, the main hurdle that it faced was lack of sponsorship. Many of the tour's events were independently promoted, and the UPA demands of the independent promoters were not very well received.
The organization and/or tour must be TRANSPARENT. The rules must be set in stone and adhered to, not changed willy nilly at each event. The ranking system should be the determining factor when it comes to sending American players to high-profile invitational events, like the BCA's "Open."
Though some of the names forthcoming are worthy of consideration, there seem to be a lot of Chiefs and not enough Indians, and the Indians are the players themselves.
In case you haven't noticed, more and more pool tournaments are being held overseas. I would like to see more lucrative events held on American soil. An American professional tour is needed to ensure more young players of professional caliber. Without it, the existing lot of American players will continue to dwindle, and there will be no need for a tour. JMHO, FWIW!
JAM