Everyone knows Matlock robs Keith. Deep down in her soul, Jam does too....
Everyone knows Matlock robs Keith. Deep down in her soul, Jam does too....
Quit yo cussin Jam.
Furthermore, just to add a little truth to the thread, Keith barbecued Larry Hubbart when he was on the road with Mike Sigel, spotting him a ball or two out in California -- ROBBED, to use your word, Larry Hubbart on the bar table.
Larry Hubbart and Mike Sigel had enough of California and Keith, so they left town and went to play Dave Matlock in the Midwest. Larry Hubbart played him even and, to use your word again, ROBBED Dave Matlock.
Now, let's look at this. Keith robs Larry Hubbart with a spot. Larry Hubbart the next week plays Dave Matlock even and defeats Dave Matlock.
As has been explained ad nauseum on this forum many times before, every player has a streak, some longer than others. When Keith was in his prime, he could spot Dave Matlock. The two players peaked at different times. I'm pretty sure that Shane Van Boening could defeat, say, Buddy Hall or Mike Sigel or Nick Varner or Jim Rempe topday, but look at the difference of when each player peaked. Shane might not have liked their action when they were in their prime.
What's sickening is that you keep bringing this up on AzBilliards Discussion Forum, your high praises of how Dave Matlock is so much better than Keith McCready. Meanwhile, the two player are good buddies and have total respect for each other's game. Neither one would say they could have, would have, or should have robbed the other.
It's funny that no one mentions Buddy Hall here? Buddy beat every existing player on the barbox back in the day..Forget beating Buddy Hall on a bar table in the 70's.
It's funny that no one mentions Buddy Hall here? Buddy beat every existing player on the barbox back in the day..Forget beating Buddy Hall on a bar table in the 70's.
Furthermore, just to add a little truth to the thread, Keith barbecued Larry Hubbart when he was on the road with Mike Sigel, spotting him a ball or two out in California -- ROBBED, to use your word, Larry Hubbart on the bar table.
Larry Hubbart and Mike Sigel had enough of California and Keith, so they left town and went to play Dave Matlock in the Midwest. Larry Hubbart played him even and, to use your word again, ROBBED Dave Matlock.
Now, let's look at this. Keith robs Larry Hubbart with a spot. Larry Hubbart the next week plays Dave Matlock even and defeats Dave Matlock.
As has been explained ad nauseum on this forum many times before, every player has a streak, some longer than others. When Keith was in his prime, he could spot Dave Matlock. The two players peaked at different times. I'm pretty sure that Shane Van Boening could defeat, say, Buddy Hall or Mike Sigel or Nick Varner or Jim Rempe topday, but look at the difference of when each player peaked. Shane might not have liked their action when they were in their prime.
What's sickening is that you keep bringing this up on AzBilliards Discussion Forum, your high praises of how Dave Matlock is so much better than Keith McCready. Meanwhile, the two player are good buddies and have total respect for each other's game. Neither one would say they could have, would have, or should have robbed the other.
Your right John, I forgot Paul Turner, he was a monster on the bar box, he told me once while at a tournament at the Rack in Memphis that he ran 26 racks of 9-Ball on the bar box gambling the night his mother died, he was in the middle of about a 10 rack run then practicing when he told me this.
I'll add him to my list, there are lot's of guys that should be in a Hall of Fame for bar box play that were head and shoulders above all other players on that table, several I haven't seen play, but I've seen plenty of um, never had the pleasure of watching Peru Paul play.
David
99? Do you mean NA-NA?
I've been around since the early 80's. I've played or been around all the players on "the list" you had your bar table players and you had your big table players,and they didn't mix it up much. Most of em had a rep for one or the other,not both. Very few would play on either table. I would say it would have been under 20. In all my years out there from the early 80's Matlock was a shoe in for the best on the bar table. Even though I blanked him one time in a tourney in Moline,ILJohn B.
Ah yes, the Moline Massacre.