This is my second King, after I sold my first one shortly after getting it when i thought i was done with the game due to health. Anyways, it worked out, as I love this one. Al completed it a few months ago. Nice black suede body and lizard inlays. The best feature is the full-zip pockets, so im not trying to dig for chalk with my fingertips.

Corwyn_8 said:

I am imagining the probable English (watching too many snooker matches) solution to this would be to mark the last object ball, re-rack, and then replace the OB. Is there a reason that this wouldn't be a better solution (other than tradition, of course)? It would remove the variable of different auxiliary equipment from the equation.

Thank you kindly.

Click to expand...

I believe that is already the routine in a refereed tournament, regardless. Even if the ball is outside the line, it has to be marked & replaced if it would interfere with racking.
If a very close ball doesn’t interfere when using a template, but would be inside if a line had been drawn, then it likely couldn’t be pocketed anyway. At least the run could continue with the break ball on the headspot.

I'm for the shot clock but 30 sec is too short.
Have to give enough time to be able to grab a jump cue or extension without running around the arena.
40sec - 45sec should just right.

Latest FB post by Kaci

Login to view embedded media

Meucci casino 8 … carbon fiber shaft?

What was original MSRP?

So nice …

I won't name names here, but the silicon spray issue has been around for about twenty-five years. Only a few were believed to be doing it. Putting the spray on one's towel, on the outside of one's glove, on the outside of one's pants, or inside the pockets of one's pants were among the ways it was accomplished.

nataddrho said:

Finally…
View attachment 839777

Click to expand...

you got it heated ? how it plays? What cloth did you get?
Looks good!

Why not expand the number of players on each team to 10 or 12? Play way more matches, have 3 or 4 tables going.

Corwyn_8 said:

I am imagining the probable English (watching too many snooker matches) solution to this would be to mark the last object ball, re-rack, and then replace the OB. Is there a reason that this wouldn't be a better solution (other than tradition, of course)? It would remove the variable of different auxiliary equipment from the equation.

Thank you kindly.

Click to expand...

There are some break balls that would be nearly unplayable if the rule was changed to "interfering with a ball in the rack." For example, a ball nearly touching the back of the rack.