Could straight pool thrive with a gimmick format?

I create this thread knowing full well that die hard straight pool players will think I'm trying to dilute their beautiful game. I live in the UK and am a UK 9 & 10 ball player currently on a self-imposed hiatus, mainly because I can't afford to replace my warped cues (this should change in the fall).

In the UK straight pool is basically a "drill", a way to kill an hour of a practice session or a way to get in stroke. With no tournaments to speak of the only measure of progress is one's highest run. It looks to have a stronger following in mainland Europe.

14.1 is my favourite disclipline, despite only playing a handfull of sets in my 46 years, and I believe it is too good just to serve as a practice tool. I wonder if an Ultimate Pool-style revamp could boost its popularity. Snooker continues to boom worldwide yet quicker tv-friendly formats such as The Shootout and The 900 have proved popular and hold their own (The Shootout now carries tour ranking points).

While straight pool is often considered to be the purest form of pool it is hardly the most spectator friendly. It must be played on 9 footers, and with bigger pockets used than those in the Appleton v Deuel Predator exhibition. A double-elimination style format could be played under the following conditions:
Best-of-three 30 minute sets.
Set winner determined by reaching target score OR whoever has the lead as time expires (whatever comes first).
20 second shot clock for first 20 minutes of each set, 10 second shot clock thereafter.
Three extensions per player per set.

Will something like this please the pursists? Probably not. But flag football is now an Olympic sport, 3x3 basketball has a world tour while cricket introduced T20 AND The Hundred. They are all shortened or simplified versions of very popular sports. My idea might not elevate straight pool to these levels, but it might get a few more people playing.

Is Pia Filler #1???

That's subjective idiot. Her ranking is fact based off stats and yes she still would destroy you in a match and I still would put 1k on Pia..
Are you on the tracks to understand the people are criticizing the WPA ranking algorithm and not Pia?

If you really want to bet 1k to Pia as the #1, would you bet against any women in this list?

Playing Pool after 50?

I’m 54 and feel like I’m playing the best pool of my life mentally and physically. The only adjustment I had to make is in my 40s my eyes that were good enough to play pool without glasses ( I would take them off when playing ) suddenly said nope! We’re out 😂 so I had to adjust to wearing glasses. The best thing I did was get a diamond with 4.25 inch pockets at home. I had to completely rebuild my fundamentals because they had gotten sloppy through the years but I came out the other side a better player.

Is Pia Filler #1???

I don't think we should call people names. But I will make an exception and call you names. You are a moron. :LOL:
It is ok that you defend Pia. But wth has that got to do with winning Pia in a race to 10 ?
So if we give Timothee Chamelet acting a bad review, we have to win acting awards to be better than him? Every time slam a politician, we have to beat him in an election? Every time we criticize a conman like Madoff, we have to con better than him ?
That's subjective idiot. Her ranking is fact based off stats and yes she still would destroy you in a match and I still would put 1k on Pia..

I finally played Ultimate Pool

You're totally right. That was one of the first rules I questioned. Their response was that everything they do is designed to speed up the competitions. They want to avoid long, drawn out racks to keep the tournament on schedule and to add excitement for the viewers.
I think it may make sense in the 30 minute match system. But I don’t think I like the rule. Last night was the first time I saw someone lose a rack for that. I think he just forgot BCA vs UPL. And the match was two pretty even lower ranked players so the time clock wasn’t an issue when it happened. You mentioned above you have to spot 4 games many times. In that scenario trying to tie up balls playing safes on you would be a good time wasting strategy in some situations. The clock isn’t always an issue but it can be.

I apparently got away with a loss of game foul because I pulled the cue ball from the ball return and handed it to the opponent after I scratched a couple weeks ago. Didn’t know it was loss of game and neither did the opponent. Told later it was because of the shot clock. I guess it keeps things moving. That said, we’ll see how the league does going forward. I am still trying to keep an open mind and try to play as well as I can this season. But afterwards I’ll assess and see if it is for me. I am wondering if some players will keep playing in future seasons. I don’t think I am the only one who hasn’t loved the format. Some people do like it though.

Filter

Back
Top