Sure they sponsored a small number of top players. That's not exactly giving back to the people that feed them in a significant way, it's just a pittance of advertising budget going to a very select few. And tournament sponsorship? very little, if you put it in perspective of the size of the company. Hell, I am pretty sure the Jansco Brothers, who were basically nobodies in the middle of nowhere, put up more money than the Brunswick giant corporation did year-to-year. The problem with Brunswick, and much of the early BCA industry, seems to be that they really did not like pool players -- they liked people and institutions that bought their tables. That's a big difference. They needed a few faces of billiard expertise for their advertising of course, so Mosconi and a select few benefited, but I am interested in hearing details of exactly how much they EVER gave to the players in general, via tournament added money or any kind of widespread endorsements (not just Mosconi).
I just would like to compare that amount of $$ with what other more player friendly pool industries of the past and present give. I think you might find Brunswick won't look so good...