John French is bad for pool
I stayed with Dennis at DCC and I don't know everything either but know a lot. Almost everything I've read on here is inaccurate. I listened to the podcast and listened to numerous phone calls between Sword brothers, Dennis , and French.
Dennis told me he never received any money from the Shane and Dennis match. He only got $650 out of the Ko match and he told me me he found out French bet around $5k on Dennis through Internet, over phone, etc that he never told Dennis about. Then he signs Ko brothers halfway through the match. He called Dennis 10 times an hour at Derby begging Dennis to go eat, go gamble in casino and Dennis just wanted away from him.
French owes a good friend of mine $13,000 and he gave him a $1,500 cue and thinks they are even because French says it's worth $13k. He lies about everything and so often he believes his own lies. That's my version believe what you want but I have no reason to lie.
I am not surprised.

Some folks here are just gullible and it is shocking that they are swallowing up wholesale John French version in his interview and taking that as gospel truth.
I have said before that John French is a snake oil salesman. Why?
The smoking gun and incriminating thing is the contract with Dennis which French posted few days ago.
Which interestingly, he has now conveniently removed
http://forums.azbilliards.com/showthread.php?t=418324
There should be copy of it somewhere on internet
Folks should read and reread that contract. It was signed in Oct2015 when they were still on good terms and before this blowup between them
That contract basically says Dennis has to pay 50% of his earnings AND does not state that French has to do anything or pay for expenses etc. That contract basically shows that French had intention to deceive, cheat, rip off Dennis.
He may have paid for Dennis expenses etc. but may stop paying at any time since he is not obligated to pay in the contract. Furthermore, there is clause in contract that Dennis has to pay for 50% of certain expenses etc and French can use this clause to claim 50% of expenses he has paid
In ABR interview, David Bond pressed French whether he thinks 50% is too high now asnd French avoided the question (like he avoided question about why he took all credit on stream for Dennis/Ko match when he did not set it up)
It matters not whether Dennis read English or it was read out to him or whether he understood it. That contract was unenforceable because it is totally unfair and draconian. More importantly, the contract demonstrated that French had intention to cheat, deceive, defraud Dennis. This may be a chargeable offence if it happened in major sports like soccer, tennis, golf.
Both interviews are mostly "he said he said"
Obviously, each interview each of them will say nice things about themselves and everything against other guy. A lot of stuff said are unsubstantiated by third party or written records. Some stuff do not tally. Like French said he already paid $10K appearance to Dennis but Dennis has said he was not paid. French said Dennis was paid 40% of Dennis/Ko stream (which is likely speculation since he was not directly involved) while it was said that Dennis only receive $650 or $750
French said he paid Dennis $6500 for DCC but there is no third party confirmation or confirmation by Dennis on this.
French's brother , Kenny also said on internet that French has spent $100K already which sounds like another overblown number. French is crying over $6500 so why is he not crying over $100K on ABR if he actually spent that much
Bottomline, both French and Dennis may not be telling everything or whole truth. But the more slimy character is John French. That contract with Dennis showed he had intention to cheat, deceive, defraud. He should not be allowed to sign similar contracts with other players or represent players.
He is bad for pool.
