I get the impression that a large portion of the added money to the straight pool event comes out of a few hard core fans pockets. Definitely insulting when they have to read that a player feels their money isn't big enough.
I don't really feel comfortable copy-pasting Schmidt's comments from Facebook to here, but it seems like he is basically saying "I had a good reason but I'm not going to tell anyone" and "It's my money, they don't pay us well, so I can do what I want and it's none of your (the fans) business."
If there are any guilty parties here then they're both guilty. Saying there was wrongdoing because folks may have bet on the match is ludicrous. You don't like it? Don't bet on it. No need for a player to feel financially obligated to anyone except himself or his backer. They're playing for themselves and have their own reasons for what they do. Allowing people to make side bets on your match so they can make money off you is pretty much not a priority for them.
Was John being paid by the stream? If not he had no obligation to that or those watching IMO. I do hope John chimes in but many hear have crucified this guy without even knowing what happened.
Who cares if he was getting paid. That has no relevance to the people that paid to watch.
Who cares if he was getting paid. That has no relevance to the people that paid to watch.
Not sure i agree with that. If he wasn't being paid and no one backed him in the event and he is essentially allowing himself to be taped doing his thing-well he did his thing.
John is not the devil but anyone who followed pool a little closely over the last 15 years knows if he gets hot, he is subject to quitting. Ho hum.
t
Well who cares if you guys paid to watch. That has no relevance to him. Personally you shouldn't be charged to watch if the players aren't being paid to be shown, players have an obligation to the event not the stream unless the stream is kicking money to the players or the event IMO.
If the "pro" players truly want this game to grow, then they do need to give a damn about things like this. Attracting an audience that is willing to pay to see players should be paramount. Even if at this time they aren't seeing anything directly from it.
Or......
They can continue to complain about the sorry state of "pro" pool.
It's their game. What do they want from it? And what are they willing to do to get it?
(In this particular instance, John may indeed have had something more going on. I'm not discounting that possibility. What I'm doing is pointing out that the attitude of "what am I getting out of it" will continue to keep "pro" pool exactly where it is.)
I agree with this, without the fans...what is the point of professional pool or any professional sport. Professional sport is about to promoting the game, it's sponsors and affiliated companies. Ultimately it is about the spectators and not the players.
John just posted this.
I got fined 300 for quitting match . I'm totally ok with that and think its appropriate that I was fined. People thought because guys running it are showing favoritism, I think it was perfect solution. I was having godawful week and honestly knew I had no business being under stress in front of crowd. Sorry to the sponsors and fans for quitting but sometimes I get so frustrated I just have to leave the room and all the glaring eyes that luv watching me fail. For the record I was ahead 117-60 going to 125 and missed breakball. So no I didn't quit because I was playing bad I was actually playing good and winning. I was just on edge. Anyways I'm far from perfect and ill most likely do more stuff in future I regret .
I get the impression that a large portion of the added money to the straight pool event comes out of a few hard core fans pockets. Definitely insulting when they have to read that a player feels their money isn't big enough.
I hope those guys don't give up trying to keep the game alive.