If they dont want their integrity questioned they shouldnt promote fake matches. Its really that simple for me. Because someone does something good doesnt mean when they do something jacked up they get a pass. This was blatant. Tell people one thing, do another and cut up the PPV.
I dont think Al is a bad guy. I think he just doesnt know what he's doing when it comes to PPV challenge matches. My guess is he got pressure from multiple sides and just went along saying "Well I'm only the streamer" I don't buy that line. He is benefitting from the sale of something thats not what its claimed to be. Bottom line. He should own it, learn from it and not do it again. Instead its just been deleting posts and silence.
The room owner has been promoting matches with fake numbers for a long time. Everyone knows it. Say its for this but each guy gets that. Its a joke. Just be honest about whats going on.
Doing free streams is easy. There is no pressure. When you start using your name to promote a product and take peoples money for that product you are in another world. The rules are different. All I want is honesty about what is being sold and accountability if things go off the rails.
Some good points being made by several contributors. In particular, JCIN has made some points that should be looked at as being at the heart of the matter and should be responded to by those whose actions have been questioned.
Either those involved acted with integrity or they have not and it would appear that some have not. I would like to see the questions JCIN has raised answered and I appeal to Al, in particular, to do so.
Al, it is time for you to weigh in; I listened as you pitched these matches during Turning Stone with the excitement of a carnival pitchman as you repeatedly declared that these titans of pool would be matching up for big bucks. When did you know that this was not the case and the match was simply going to be an exhibition where we mere fans should be still be thankful to pay for the privilege of watching two top professionals play? One of the participants, Dennis, has justified his going along with this by saying he just wanted to play and that, in spite of the greatly reduced pay day, he still played hard, the other participant, KO, has not, to my knowledge, said if he also played his hardest; doesn’t matter, the match was under false pretences. Anyway, how do you justify it?
Al, simply put, you were the one driving the advertising and looking to pump up the pay per view numbers with over the top hyperbole along with screen shots of the big event posters. You then should respond to your customers, past, present and future, as to what you knew, when and, most importantly, did you then attempt to cover it up so as to protect the PPV?
The same questions should be answered by Steinway as the door take and food and beverage sales would certainly benefit from the hype being generated. I do not expect that Steinway will weigh in on this after the (in hindsight) embarrassingly effusive notice that team French was now synonymous with Steinway billiards; unless they still do not know it was not as advertised. I see that the poster and event are still posted as the originally advertised, $20,000 on their site and facebook.
Both DO and JF have commented on this and also the dealings between them and much of it is, and should be, between them. Regardless of what anyone thinks of what they have said, good on them for not ducking and actually responding. Only DO has referred to his match with KO becoming, what was essentially an exhibition, by indicating he felt it was all right to mislead the paying customers because he would play hard. JF has indicated he had almost nothing to do with this match (DO vs KO) other than to bet on the outcome. This seems to leave Al and Manny as the principal promoters of the match and I think that it is incumbent upon them to respond to the concerns of the fans who paid the live gate and PPV under a false impression.