I don't know, Alex got a 1st, a 3rd, and a 9th, strong finishes in all three events.
SVB got a 1st, a 2nd, and a what? 96th? Maybe? 2 strong finishes and a complete fail on the third.
So the 1st place finishes should be a wash, you have SVB with a second compared to Alex's 3rd, and then you compared Alex's 9th with SVB's second round and gone in the Banks. IMO Alex's strong finish of 9th should be worth more then the difference between 2nd and 3rd given Shane's other event was almost as low as he could be.
It is not Shane's fault he got the prize, he is certainly not going to turn it down, but the people who manage the points might want to look into it because this result was pretty goofy.
I definately don't want to see AZB tar and fearher Alex and make him figure poker and chickens are a much more relaxing life and have this the last time we see him.
The guy got drunk, 1 week ago everyone was saying Alex is one of the most friendly and well respected ambassadors in the sport and now he should be banned, suspended, have his fingernails ripped out, ect.... Try to be a little more balanced on the highs and lows people.
Good post. I think Alex's finish in all three tournaments was equal to Shane's finish in all. How are the points given? Does amount of entries play a part? I'd sure like to know.