Most likely you're just trolling but I'll indulge. Not sure why his opinion would be worthless. In fact I think the opposite. Danny is someone who has actually owned and played with one of Brent's cues for some period of time. He's had dealings with him and got to know him. Why would his opinion be more worthwhile if he didn't know Brent or ever used one of his cues?
No troll but he said his cues were better then almost anyone else's.
I can list 20 names that I am almost certain his cues are not better than.
Of course we don't have a list of criteria to judge them on, but if we ran a poll I am certain that the majority of people who have any level of knowledge and experience would not place Brent in their top 25 cuemaker list.
Again I have no ill wishes toward Brent and don't want to come off as anti Brent, but lets be honest here.
Also to be honest Brent would agree and posted about this guy blowing smoke up his ass. Truth be told Brent is a somewhat new to the game maker who is doing nice affordable cues, lets calm down with the "better then almost ANYONE else."
I am fine with
"he's one of the nicest guys to work with"
"he makes a great cue for the money"
"his cues are really nice"
" I love the way his cues look"
"I love the way his cues play"
But please with the "Better then almost anyone elses"