smokey said:john,
you make great cases for sure. an expert for sure.
are you a cue expert too?
miles
No, far from it. My comments are based on over 25 years of playing and 17 years of hanging around custom and production cuemakers. And based on 20 years of selling cues.
I guess I have been privileged through the case making to have had the opportunity to learn the hows and whys of cuemaking from dozens of cuemakers all over the world. I might belong to a very small group that has spent consdierable time in cuemaker's shops and factories all over the world.
I had a personal collection of about 20 cues ranging from mundane to very special. I estimate that I have owned well over 200 cues in my lifetime. Dave Gross can attest to the fact that I know cues and have owned some of the best. In our German shop we had over 100 cues on the wall at any given time with most of them being custom and most being names you all are familiar with.
So while I am no expert I do consider myself to be quite experienced with a vast range of cues. There aren't many brands that I have not hit with, not many that I personally, my partners or my business has not owned. I would say that I am qualified to judge a good hitting cue from a bad hitting cue even as subjective as "hit" is. I am pretty sure that a cue I classify as good hitting will be found to be so by most people who have a similar experience level as I have.
I have seen the flirtation with carom jointed cues for many years on and off and have yet to see them take off.
However I will say this - in our shop in Geremany we had two custom cues by an Italian maker - not Longoni - whose name escapes me right now, something with an A. One was made with a pool taper and one with a carom taper. Both had carom wood joints in the shaft. With the pool cue I could do things with the cue ball that I could not do with any of the standard "American" style pool cues we had in stock. And I tried. I have told this story several times on various forums in different contexts.
The point is that there is something to the big wood pin (and perhaps to the big inserted pin in the shaft) that may well be better for playing pool than we know. Perhaps, and this is strictly my opinion, these configuations are more suitable for games like nine ball where there is a lot of cueball movement and fast cloth. Perhaps the cues in the Bushka style of construction were more suited to Straight Pool and slow cloth. I don't know. What I do know is that cues with carom wood joints do play differently, some feel they play better than standard cues.
Last edited: