I believe a lot on here would do better practicing position and how to control the CB than spending endless hours talking about aiming systems that are only going to get you in the ballpark. Better position=closer shots=make more balls=make more balls and you will get the feel of all the angles. Johnnyt
It will be an ongoing argument for years to come I feel. The egg or the Chicken?
i would be curious to know the opinion of 3 players on these topics, Buddy, Hopkins, and Segal?? Then to complicate things, let's throw in two contrasting in style players like David Matlock and Greg Stevens.
I ran around with Stevens in the 70's and asked him in the car once what he aimed at and how he learned to be one of the best at pocketing balls who has ever played. he said he could aim at several different points on every shot depending on where he wanted the cue ball.
Now Matlock and Buddy had similar styles as they were always on the right side of the ball when they fell into the zone and what started looking very odd turned out to be often brilliant and effortless. i asked Matlock the same question once and he gave pretty much the same answer as Stevens although they played as differently as night and day. i asked Buddy and was totally lost after 15 minutes of his dissertation. i think though he and Matlock were on the same page.
Segal was more of a combination of Buddy and Stevens and had that powerful stroke that kept him out of trouble over and over again and again, Plus the new Texas Express rules were tailor made for him.
I bet that if you put them all at the round table, it could very near end in a fist fight at which bet all your dough on Stevens who had a great right. Hopkins would have been relentless with that great jab. MS would be selling ticket for the event and Buddy would be practicing.
So in knowing each shot and whereto get on each next ball so on and so on is a vital part of the game.
At this point of the match if still thinking about alignment and machanics after 5000 hours of practice, it really doesn't matter because he would not have made it that far anyway.
So my implication is that once in the zone, they didn't think as much on all this as most think. They were on automatic pilot.
So i am right where I began, the egg or the Chicken?