John Shmidt's got action

shankster8 said:
Is this an avoidance to answer the question posed in the preceeding post?
Click to expand...

Nevermind.

If a match happens it happens. If not. So be it.
 
Last edited:
bignasty said:
how are we supposed to know what john and danny are thinking i mean really! why not direct the question to john himself! john isnt going to lie. danny isnt going to lie. now that being said danny you ready....schmidtty you ready..... lets get it on 1 more time for the whole ffffin thing! no threats no bs...just good old fashioned 1pocket 10 ball and my favorite 14.1...and i dont wanna hear no more the last week in april works for TAR... hell i aint never been to victorville california! danny work for you? schmiddty work for you! lets get it on........................
Click to expand...
Agreed let's move on cuz enough is enough,

I was not at the last event and I haven't read all the trash in other threads or heard the phone calls.

Let's just say the two sides have a different view of the past issues but let's put the past in the past.

So that being said looking forward let's get some answers.

1. John and Danny are you both interested in the match?
2. What special requests do you have (forget the reasons)
3. Where and when?

I agree this match has all the drama to make history but the players have to both be on board.

Danny if John is not willing to play and happy to move on who would you like to challenge?

So please let's see if we can make somthing happen instead of arguing about what did or didn't happen in the past.
 
Last edited:
DeadPoked said:
I say... quit instigating shiat when you don't have no dog in the hunt.
Click to expand...

Deadpoked, if you'll read from the beginning you should understand that I was just trying to flush out all the BS and bring this rematch into reality. Like I said, I don't know either of these gents, but I'll be pull'in for Schmidt, since I live in Victorville, and I sometimes play in his stakehorse's room. But you and everyone else probably thought I was pulling for Harriman, because my posts seemed slanted that way. Personally, I believe that it was the subtle, and not so suble, postings on this thread that eventuated in Schmitt and his stakehorse coming to the table. Otherwise I believe they would have ducked this rematch with Harriman. So, now let us all rejoice - see ya at ringside.
 
john schmidt said:
look your a great player no doubt.
your not even really a bad natured guy. thing is if you dont call me up a week before our last match threatening me physically .
then bash me for weeks right after you say you will never play me again.

well then we would have played already.

you know im going to play you as soon as somebody makes it worth my while . if that happens ill play because i respect and need money much more than i disrespect and need you.

does that sound reasonable dani haryman

p.s. you have my number remember the one you called threatening to fight a week before our last match.
instead of all this posting just call me.
Click to expand...
Just post what your stakehorse wants to bet beyond the 10K. I can help make it worth more your while and I am sure others would step up to post as well.
 
bignasty said:
how are we supposed to know what john and danny are thinking i mean really! why not direct the question to john himself! john isnt going to lie. danny isnt going to lie. now that being said danny you ready....schmidtty you ready..... lets get it on 1 more time for the whole ffffin thing! no threats no bs...just good old fashioned 1pocket 10 ball and my favorite 14.1...and i dont wanna hear no more the last week in april works for TAR... hell i aint never been to victorville california! danny work for you? schmiddty work for you! lets get it on........................
Click to expand...

As Big Nasty and Mills Lane say:
Mills.JPG
 
watchez said:
Just post what your stakehorse wants to bet beyond the 10K. I can help make it worth more your while and I am sure others would step up to post as well.
Click to expand...
fair enough . ill be clear . hes what ill do .
ill take 5000 to play. if i have to go through the mud again with this guy than 5 dimes might not be worth it.

anyway all you guys out there that like dannys end of it could pay the 5 dimes and then bet 20 dimes on the side and watch him rob me.

if i get guaranteed money ill play tommorrow and if i dont no biggie i just wont have to deal with him and ill go play around of golf,fire up the dirt bike and see you guys at the derby with no hard feelings.

he wants to play i dont because im scared but if someone wants to outsmart me and give me 5000 so they can bet on the side and make a score i completely understand and will play in victorville tommorrow.
 
John I just got to say your wife is (SMOKIN):wub: oh and if they go for the 5k your a freakin genius butt seriously hows the golf game.

Happy Thanksgiving
Randy
 
rzrbak98 said:
John I just got to say your wife is (SMOKIN):wub: oh and if they go for the 5k your a freakin genius butt seriously hows the golf game.

Happy Thanksgiving
Randy
Click to expand...

And shes a die hard railbird also.. She didnt budge in the first 1pocket TAR match... I was like you lucky mother.. well Lets just say I was a lil envious for a couple of reasonss.. haha :thumbup: All jokes aside Hes a lucky guy..
 
john schmidt said:
fair enough . ill be clear . hes what ill do .
ill take 5000 to play. if i have to go through the mud again with this guy than 5 dimes might not be worth it.

anyway all you guys out there that like dannys end of it could pay the 5 dimes and then bet 20 dimes on the side and watch him rob me.

if i get guaranteed money ill play tommorrow and if i dont no biggie i just wont have to deal with him and ill go play around of golf,fire up the dirt bike and see you guys at the derby with no hard feelings.

he wants to play i dont because im scared but if someone wants to outsmart me and give me 5000 so they can bet on the side and make a score i completely understand and will play in victorville tommorrow.
Click to expand...

Well that's too bad. I thought the match was on. But I don't blame Schmidt for ducking if he and his stakehorse think Harriman is too strong. I see this appearance fee as just being a stumbling block intended to derail the rematch.

You know, I keep hearing impuning statements directed at Harriman, but I'm still curious about whether there is any truth to Harriman's assertion that Schmidt's arguments, during the last match, over previously established jump cue rules, had no merit, and that the 10 minute argument that ensued was intended solely to prevent Harriman from capturing his victory, he was ahead 9-8. IMO, if Schmidt did pull a chickensh*t move like that, he's the one that should be stigmatized. He is the one that people should avoid playing. Is anyone who was there willing to clear this up? Harriman says to ask the TAR people if they believe John was sincere in disrupting the ordliness of that match. I asked, but TAR avoided the question, and Deadpoked scolded me for stirring sh*t.

Here's something to consider: How do you think Schmidt would have reacted if Harriman pulled that on Schmidt when Victory was in Schmidt's hands? My guess is he'd be a little pissed - and act just like Harriman. IMO if Schmidt and his stakehorse know they avoided a second loss to Harriman, only as a result of a chickensh*t ploy, and they know that Harriman is pissed, and has been practicing steady to right things, there is little wonder about what is happening here.

Finally, let me dispell a little more BS, as I see things. Earlier in this thread I read Schmidt's opinion that his and Harriman's game was even, but he later lamented that Hariman has been practicing 10 times as much as he has. Well it sounds to me like Harriman's game isn't even any more, and Schmidt knows it. I also read that Harriman sleeps on his friends couch four feet from a pool table, and has no girlfriend, and no life. Yet Harriman says he's been remodling his home, like Schmidt has, and has a girlfriend, like Schmidt has. And, what's Schmidt saying about Harriman sleeping beneath a picture of Schmidt, and throwing darts at the picture? Sounds like either Schmidt shares a bedroom in the same house, and is privy to all this juicy gossip, or he is talking out his a*s. Either way he won't play pool with the man again, $10k and duct tape notwithstanding.

I am sorry if this post rubs anyone the wrong way, and if I have erred in any details, please advise me so I might correct things/apologize. I am egged on, however, by TAR's avoidance of my question as to the sincerity of Schmidt in disrupting his last match with Harriman. TAR could have unequivocably backed Schmidt - which they did not. That speaks loudly to me. So again, if anyone was witness to Schmit's disrupting the match when victory was at hand for Harriman, please help clear this matter up.
 
shankster8 said:
Well that's too bad. I thought the match was on. But I don't blame Schmidt for ducking if he and his stakehorse think Harriman is too strong. I see this appearance fee as just being a stumbling block intended to derail the rematch.

You know, I keep hearing impuning statements directed at Harriman, but I'm still curious about whether there is any truth to Harriman's assertion that Schmidt's arguments, during the last match, over previously established jump cue rules, had no merit, and that the 10 minute argument that ensued was intended solely to prevent Harriman from capturing his victory, he was ahead 9-8. IMO, if Schmidt did pull a chickensh*t move like that, he's the one that should be stigmatized. He is the one that people should avoid playing. Is anyone who was there willing to clear this up? Harriman says to ask the TAR people if they believe John was sincere in disrupting the ordliness of that match. I asked, but TAR avoided the question, and Deadpoked scolded me for stirring sh*t.

Here's something to consider: How do you think Schmidt would have reacted if Harriman pulled that on Schmidt when Victory was in Schmidt's hands? My guess is he'd be a little pissed - and act just like Harriman. IMO if Schmidt and his stakehorse know they avoided a second loss to Harriman, only as a result of a chickensh*t ploy, and they know that Harriman is pissed, and has been practicing steady to right things, there is little wonder about what is happening here.

Finally, let me dispell a little more BS, as I see things. Earlier in this thread I read Schmidt's opinion that his and Harriman's game was even, but he later lamented that Hariman has been practicing 10 times as much as he has. Well it sounds to me like Harriman's game isn't even any more, and Schmidt knows it. I also read that Harriman sleeps on his friends couch four feet from a pool table, and has no girlfriend, and no life. Yet Harriman says he's been remodling his home, like Schmidt has, and has a girlfriend, like Schmidt has. And, what's Schmidt saying about Harriman sleeping beneath a picture of Schmidt, and throwing darts at the picture? Sounds like either Schmidt shares a bedroom in the same house, and is privy to all this juicy gossip, or he is talking out his a*s. Either way he won't play pool with the man again, $10k and duct tape notwithstanding.

I am sorry if this post rubs anyone the wrong way, and if I have erred in any details, please advise me so I might correct things/apologize. I am egged on, however, by TAR's avoidance of my question as to the sincerity of Schmidt in disrupting his last match with Harriman. TAR could have unequivocably backed Schmidt - which they did not. That speaks loudly to me. So again, if anyone was witness to Schmit's disrupting the match when victory was at hand for Harriman, please help clear this matter up.
Click to expand...
I think your too late,this thread is DEAD.:thumbup:
 
shankster8 said:
Well that's too bad. I thought the match was on. But I don't blame Schmidt for ducking if he and his stakehorse think Harriman is too strong. I see this appearance fee as just being a stumbling block intended to derail the rematch.

You know, I keep hearing impuning statements directed at Harriman, but I'm still curious about whether there is any truth to Harriman's assertion that Schmidt's arguments, during the last match, over previously established jump cue rules, had no merit, and that the 10 minute argument that ensued was intended solely to prevent Harriman from capturing his victory, he was ahead 9-8. IMO, if Schmidt did pull a chickensh*t move like that, he's the one that should be stigmatized. He is the one that people should avoid playing. Is anyone who was there willing to clear this up? Harriman says to ask the TAR people if they believe John was sincere in disrupting the ordliness of that match. I asked, but TAR avoided the question, and Deadpoked scolded me for stirring sh*t.

Here's something to consider: How do you think Schmidt would have reacted if Harriman pulled that on Schmidt when Victory was in Schmidt's hands? My guess is he'd be a little pissed - and act just like Harriman. IMO if Schmidt and his stakehorse know they avoided a second loss to Harriman, only as a result of a chickensh*t ploy, and they know that Harriman is pissed, and has been practicing steady to right things, there is little wonder about what is happening here.

Finally, let me dispell a little more BS, as I see things. Earlier in this thread I read Schmidt's opinion that his and Harriman's game was even, but he later lamented that Hariman has been practicing 10 times as much as he has. Well it sounds to me like Harriman's game isn't even any more, and Schmidt knows it. I also read that Harriman sleeps on his friends couch four feet from a pool table, and has no girlfriend, and no life. Yet Harriman says he's been remodling his home, like Schmidt has, and has a girlfriend, like Schmidt has. And, what's Schmidt saying about Harriman sleeping beneath a picture of Schmidt, and throwing darts at the picture? Sounds like either Schmidt shares a bedroom in the same house, and is privy to all this juicy gossip, or he is talking out his a*s. Either way he won't play pool with the man again, $10k and duct tape notwithstanding.

I am sorry if this post rubs anyone the wrong way, and if I have erred in any details, please advise me so I might correct things/apologize. I am egged on, however, by TAR's avoidance of my question as to the sincerity of Schmidt in disrupting his last match with Harriman. TAR could have unequivocably backed Schmidt - which they did not. That speaks loudly to me. So again, if anyone was witness to Schmit's disrupting the match when victory was at hand for Harriman, please help clear this matter up.
Click to expand...

As they say in "No Country for old men": "What business is it of yours, friendo".
 
hi

shankster8 said:
Well that's too bad. I thought the match was on. But I don't blame Schmidt for ducking if he and his stakehorse think Harriman is too strong. I see this appearance fee as just being a stumbling block intended to derail the rematch.

You know, I keep hearing impuning statements directed at Harriman, but I'm still curious about whether there is any truth to Harriman's assertion that Schmidt's arguments, during the last match, over previously established jump cue rules, had no merit, and that the 10 minute argument that ensued was intended solely to prevent Harriman from capturing his victory, he was ahead 9-8. IMO, if Schmidt did pull a chickensh*t move like that, he's the one that should be stigmatized. He is the one that people should avoid playing. Is anyone who was there willing to clear this up? Harriman says to ask the TAR people if they believe John was sincere in disrupting the ordliness of that match. I asked, but TAR avoided the question, and Deadpoked scolded me for stirring sh*t.

Here's something to consider: How do you think Schmidt would have reacted if Harriman pulled that on Schmidt when Victory was in Schmidt's hands? My guess is he'd be a little pissed - and act just like Harriman. IMO if Schmidt and his stakehorse know they avoided a second loss to Harriman, only as a result of a chickensh*t ploy, and they know that Harriman is pissed, and has been practicing steady to right things, there is little wonder about what is happening here.

Finally, let me dispell a little more BS, as I see things. Earlier in this thread I read Schmidt's opinion that his and Harriman's game was even, but he later lamented that Hariman has been practicing 10 times as much as he has. Well it sounds to me like Harriman's game isn't even any more, and Schmidt knows it. I also read that Harriman sleeps on his friends couch four feet from a pool table, and has no girlfriend, and no life. Yet Harriman says he's been remodling his home, like Schmidt has, and has a girlfriend, like Schmidt has. And, what's Schmidt saying about Harriman sleeping beneath a picture of Schmidt, and throwing darts at the picture? Sounds like either Schmidt shares a bedroom in the same house, and is privy to all this juicy gossip, or he is talking out his a*s. Either way he won't play pool with the man again, $10k and duct tape notwithstanding.

I am sorry if this post rubs anyone the wrong way, and if I have erred in any details, please advise me so I might correct things/apologize. I am egged on, however, by TAR's avoidance of my question as to the sincerity of Schmidt in disrupting his last match with Harriman. TAR could have unequivocably backed Schmidt - which they did not. That speaks loudly to me. So again, if anyone was witness to Schmit's disrupting the match when victory was at hand for Harriman, please help clear this matter up.
Click to expand...
victory at hand are you kidding me. i was shooting with all the balls on the table. he sharked me so bad so many times in the match with crying and if you think hes the favorite over me your clueless.
if anything im the favorite look at our careers gambling and tourneys hes gonna get what he wants dont worry.
since you sound like his best friend ill be sure and get you a huge sidebet.
 
Oh good God can we just end this pathetic thread already...John thinks he can win and Danny thinks he can win...End of story...sharking is a crappy part of the game but your game is at the level that it shouldn't effect your game....Just another excuse and we've heard several from both sides...Like I said before you're both professionals stop arguing like lil' girls and show some respect for the game that you both represent..
 
john schmidt said:
victory at hand are you kidding me. i was shooting with all the balls on the table. he sharked me so bad so many times in the match with crying and if you think hes the favorite over me your clueless.
if anything im the favorite look at our careers gambling and tourneys hes gonna get what he wants dont worry.
since you sound like his best friend ill be sure and get you a huge sidebet.
Click to expand...

I'll be rooting for you, John. I shoot in Gary's now and then. I'm just pushing as hard as I reasonably can to force this match into reality. You got the spirit now, sorry if I bugged! Win the tie-breaker, and then never play him again, if you wish.
 
john schmidt said:
victory at hand are you kidding me. i was shooting with all the balls on the table. he sharked me so bad so many times in the match with crying and if you think hes the favorite over me your clueless.
if anything im the favorite look at our careers gambling and tourneys hes gonna get what he wants dont worry.
since you sound like his best friend ill be sure and get you a huge sidebet.
Click to expand...
John, you are a great waste of talent. You could be making a fortune in business, probably sales.
 
hi

shankster8 said:
I'll be rooting for you, John. I shoot in Gary's now and then. I'm just pushing as hard as I reasonably can to force this match into reality. You got the spirit now, sorry if I bugged! Win the tie-breaker, and then never play him again, if you wish.
Click to expand...
youll be rooting for me. man im glad i dont have too many fans like you. your from my hometown and talking like that about me. trust me no amount of goading is going to make me play. 5000 will though guaranteed . i can make matches happen on my own i dont need help like that.

if your pulling for me cool act like it and we will have a beer after words win or lose.
 
All I know is if I needed the $$$ and knew I could win I would fade someones mouth for a weekend to get paid, I have thick enough skin to fade anyones mouth-Danny aint going to beat anyone up.


Having said that, thats me not John. I respect JS for his opinion and not wanting to play. New business this is a dead horse...
 
If this were any other sport I was say that this is great showmanship to build tention for a big match. It has worked well for professional wrestling for many years. Football rivalry games thrive on animosity like this whether its genuine or not.

The JS Quentin Hann match had potential but it never happened. This match would be good but it will probably not happen.

Best of luck to both players in what ever you choose to do. I have much respect for both.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top