Larry Chiborak???

I'm just wondering what the solution is? Would it be putting Shane in Johnny's position?..... is the problem with Johnny or would everyone feel better if Shane was the "president" or leader of the pro players?


slan·der [slan-der] Show IPA
noun
1.
defamation; calumny: rumors full of slander.
2.
a malicious, false, and defamatory statement or report: a slander against his good name.

3.
Law. defamation by oral utterance rather than by writing, pictures, etc.
verb (used with object)
4.
to utter slander against; defame.
verb (used without object)
5.
to utter or circulate slander.

I think the problem is that the players are looking to another player for business leadership and organization. Pool players are good at playing pool.

Form a group. Put in some money. Hire someone who knows what they are doing. Hold them accountable. Its not exactly black magic.
 
No, putting Shane in Johnny's position is not the answer. The solution would have been for ABP to make sure the money was there before PEOPLE CHANGED THEIR LIVES for this game. That would have been the perfect solution actually.

And congrats on your copy/paste job.



I think the players knew what risks they were taking with BB. If they didn't then they're naive.
 
I'm just wondering what the solution is? Would it be putting Shane in Johnny's position?..... is the problem with Johnny or would everyone feel better if Shane was the "president" or leader of the pro players?

In the case of pool players, putting any one of them in charge is likely a catastrophe. PGA and other athletic groups have lawyers and business professionals who read contracts, negotiate, and advise them. Throwing some letters in front of your name and calling yourself a players' association means squat when you manage your operation like a kid's lemonade stand.

I'd offer to do some of these things to help the players out but it's not worth the whining you would have to listen to. 1/2 would want pockets small and the other 1/2 large. All of them complain because the money doesn't get paid but if you recommend boycotting something because the money just doesn't add up then you really don't support pool and the players. It's truly stupid.
 
No, putting Shane in Johnny's position is not the answer. The solution would have been for ABP to make sure the money was there before PEOPLE CHANGED THEIR LIVES for this game. That would have been the perfect solution actually.

And congrats on your copy/paste job.

It's been said that arguing with the less intelligent on the net is like playing chess with a pigeon.- They will just knock over the pieces, shit on the board and then strut around like they're victorious.
 
I'm just wondering what the solution is? Would it be putting Shane in Johnny's position?..... is the problem with Johnny or would everyone feel better if Shane was the "president" or leader of the pro players?

Again CJ - your logic is flawed. The leader of the Pro Players doesn't have to be justified by who the best player is or who the most liked is. It should be someone that is QUALIFIED. If that makes it someone that SVB can give the 6 ball to, then so be it. If there is no Pro Player qualified then do what JCIN suggested - find someone outside of a pro that can do it.

In most major sports, it is a player or ex player that leads the group of pros. The most recognizable probably being Gene Upshaw in the NFL. Lebron is thinking about being voted upon to be the leader of the NBA players. Notice the word - voted. It is not a self appointment. And even Lebron thinks he may just be too busy to do it. I don't think he would be a good choice - he has nothing more than a high school education and some street smarts.

What pro pool should do is create a website for pro pool players. Then have anyone that is a pro or feels they are a pro, register on the site. There should be some criteria to what a pro pool player is. Then once everyone has registered, have people put there name in the hat to lead the players. They can post in a blog why they feel they are qualified, where they see the future of pro pool, etc. Then anyone that is registered gets to vote. Then you would have your leader. You can do this down the line for other officials within the organization as well.

But you don't state that Oscar Dominquez is the treasurer and post that to the public before you tell Oscar himself.
 
It's been said that arguing with the less intelligent on the net is like playing chess with a pigeon.- They will just knock over the pieces, shit on the board and then strut around like they're victorious.

I've never heard that saying, but I just laughed for a solid minute out loud picturing it. LMAO
 
I've never heard that saying, but I just laughed for a solid minute out loud picturing it. LMAO

There is actually a picture out there somewhere im 98% sure. The image of the pigeon strutting makes the whole thing.
 
I laughed even harder imagining Cleary acting like the pigeon. I understand it is a reversal of roles but I am having trouble envisioning CJ copping a squat on the table. Yet, for some mysterious reason, I have no trouble at all thinking that Cleary would do it for a bottle of hooch and a Ribeye.
 
I laughed even harder imagining Cleary acting like the pigeon. I understand it is a reversal of roles but I am having trouble envisioning CJ copping a squat on the table. Yet, for some mysterious reason, I have no trouble at all thinking that Cleary would do it for a bottle of hooch and a Ribeye.

Who's to say I havnt??
 
Mark's late fees where a subject when BB announced they would not run in July. All the BB players who hadn't entered the tournament decided to do so. There were MANY complains outside of facebook.
We never heard as many complains the previous years because the same players paid in advance, having no alternative.

Well the only one I heard or read about was Rodney's. But again so what? It's a competitive world. People make choices and deal with consequences all the time. If I complain about late fees then so what? So what if the year before there was no other event scheduled and the players who wanted to attend paid in advance? If you want to be the top event and insure all the players choose your event then make it so attractive financially that no player would dare miss it.

That's the lesson of the IPT if you want one takeaway. The only thing Kevin proved and that BB has proved is that if you dangle a big enough carrot then you get ALL the rabbits. The risk to reward ratio has to be compelling enough.

Maybe you should think about it another way. Last year HAVING NO CHOICE as you put it players opted to go to the event(s). This year HAVING A CHOICE some opted not to. So if I understand you correctly you would prefer a world where there is no choice to insure that you can pay what you want and still get a full field. Is this what you want?



If I had a million to put up in a project that costs at least 2 millions, I would not do it, quite simply.

Really? You think it's that simple?

I would not be so harsh if the way they entered had made sense. Competition the way they played it was the worst possible. No sanctioning of the exisiting bodies, no debate, which in the end put the players in the middle.

I am sorry but who is supposed to sanction a pool game not covered by any organization? The players don't BELONG to anyone. Some of them are members of the APB and even then they don't follow the APB's guideline on where to play. Middle of what? You mean in the middle of choices? Like the cereal companies put me in the middle when I am shopping? Let's see this delicious sugary brand or this healthy bland one - curse you cereal companies for making me choose!!!!!

So, IMO, Chiborak and his peers advertised a dream scenario where pro players would 'get paid to play and not pay to play', which is impossible in the current economic state and current status of our sport.

Why is it impossible? He did it for seven months or so. In fact they got paid even when they were NOT playing. If the money was there they would still be getting paid to play and not paying to play as you put it.

However that statement is the absolute heart of the matter. Players in a tournament environment PAY to play hoping that they will earn enough to make a profit over expenses and maybe get another title to add to their resume so that they can get or keep their sponsors. When offered a CHOICE of getting PAID to play instead some took that choice and decided not to take the risk of going to events to try and make a profit.

And to be clear it was only SOME players. In final analysis just about all the major stars were present and accounted for at the events. Some stars not in BB were also not there.

I feel bad for the players who believed in the impossible, but I do not feel bad for the people who created the dream and explained how and why it was the future.

You keep saying the impossible. What makes you the expert on what is and is not possible? Are you aware that the money we are talking about is barely worth mentioning to the people who invest in startups for a living? What if BB had a 20 million budget and a year to sell their product to a network? Would it be more possible then? We have all seen stupid stuff get funded for up to hundreds of millions.

Too bad you can't have any sympathy for people who put up their own millions to try to make something happen. I hope you NEVER lose any money on an investment and then have people say so what, you should have known better.


Competing this way against you would be opening a shop, advertising a brand new way to create cue cases and sell them for $25 a piece, claiming to have a better quality than you. And then not delivering, because of course it doesn't make any sense.

So BB delivered for seven months, paying the players and then when they ran out of money it suddenly doesn't make sense? I guess by that logic the World Poker Tour doesn't make sense either because the guy who created it spent all of his own money until he was broke developing the concept and was rejected by many channels until finally landing a deal with the Travel Channel. And the rest is history.


So again, the players got screwed. And we all know there is no way this project - as it is - will come back, ever. Just because it does not make any business sense, period.

Does not make sense to you. To me it makes perfect sense. Develop a new game, infuse some drama, make it bright and colorful and put it on TV. Has that ever been done before?

Look up American Gladiators on YouTube to find your answer. Modern day equivalent, Survivor.

And last thing, where do you know that Chiborak ever invested his own money? Do you know this for sure? He has definitely invested a lot of time and effort, but also claimed to have many people invested financially.

I don't know it and this is a fair point. But I would be willing to bet he has a significant chunk of his own money in this. I think with projects like this the founder usually is heavily invested which in turn is attractive to other investors.

Anybody who invests this much time and effort would deserve a fair chance, but again, not the way they acted. They would have to start by blending in the industry, work with others and apologize to a few people, starting with the players.

Now that's a whole other issue. I have no idea what went on behind the scenes and Mark is very upset by it which tells me that it was not pretty. For this reason mostly I don't give a shit if BB comes back or not. Mark is pretty easy to get along with so for him to be publicly pissed must mean that some crap went down. However that does not lessen my sympathy for the loss of a couple million if this ends up being a loss.


The very thing BB and the ABP were advertising, they couldn't produce. They were supposed to create a stream of revenue for pro players, and they left them with debts. No statements, no apologies, nothing more than what many of us feared: a worse debacle than the IPT.

Really? The IPT left much more in their wake. Some pros bought houses based on IPT promises and early payments. The IPT left many debts unpaid to vendors and hotels. What have the pros really lost from BB to this point? A few thousand dollars?

Lets be realistic here. They went out to Vegas for several months and played pool and rented a place to stay. What did they leave behind? Nothing that's what. They didn't quit lucrative jobs to follow the pool dream. They didn't quit a successful professional tour to follow BB. Most of them were broke before they started and they are possibly about the same amount of broke now. They took a shot. BB has nothing to apologize to the players for and I am sure they (Larry and whoever) is working hard to try and keep it going.

Did the WPA apologize for the tournament that was canceled in Finland or Iceland or whatever, the one where many players from around the world had already PAID for the tickets and cleared their schedule? Did they get compensated for that? No of course they didn't. Did the WPA apologize for the FACT that they chose to support Makabenta and thus RUIN the Matchroom World 9 Ball Championships causing a loss of a tournament that paid $100,000 to the winner? No, they did not.

Did they apologize for sanctioning Barry Behrman's US Open and then the subsequent non-payment? No they did not.

So don't act like Bonus Ball and Larry is all evil here and deserves to lose his money. Players get treated like pawns by all sides and always have been. And they seem to want it that way because they also didn't learn anything from the IPT. If they had then they would have a TRULY effective and strong player's association that would not allow their players to go and compete without the money being good.
 
CJ...thank you for your continuing support of the Pro players...you, and several of the other posters in this thread, are some of the people that I respect and admire most on these forums...thanks again for being such an important and active asset to pool here in America...IMHO, we are truly lucky to have you....

[I wish more of the Pros would post here also...but, we all know why they don't...so, oh well...we can always hope that things will, in that respect, improve in the future....]
 
CJ the most important definition is highlight below.

The written word cannot be slander.


I'm just wondering what the solution is? Would it be putting Shane in Johnny's position?..... is the problem with Johnny or would everyone feel better if Shane was the "president" or leader of the pro players?


slan·der [slan-der] Show IPA
noun
1.
defamation; calumny: rumors full of slander.
2.
a malicious, false, and defamatory statement or report: a slander against his good name.

3.
Law. defamation by oral utterance rather than by writing, pictures, etc.
verb (used with object)
4.
to utter slander against; defame.
verb (used without object)
5.
to utter or circulate slander.

The Dictionary is the Teacher
or
Reading is Fundamental
 
Last edited:
they're just seeking a better quality of life, compensation, and work conditions....

CJ...thank you for your continuing support of the Pro players...you, and several of the other posters in this thread, are some of the people that I respect and admire most on these forums...thanks again for being such an important and active asset to pool here in America...IMHO, we are truly lucky to have you....

[I wish more of the Pros would post here also...but, we all know why they don't...so, oh well...we can always hope that things will, in that respect, improve in the future....]

Things are improving, I'm really excited about the next 12 months, we are about to see some monumental changes.

The pros are probably wise not to post here and share their honest opinions, and, for now, that's ok. I have a pretty good idea what their objectives are and, for the most part they're just seeking a better quality of life, compensation, and work conditions.....who can blame them for that?

At the end of the day we're all equal in one way, shape or form, - some of us play pool, some ride motorcycles, some like to fish, some like to hunt, some like to chase women, some drink, others choose other hobbies - we are just trying to get through our own 'trials and tribulations" and that's the "Game" called life.....and it is the teacher. ;)

Aloha .....

aloha-approved.jpg
 
.that's my logical, humorous input based on "signatures"

Quote:
Originally Posted by CJ Wiley View Post
I'm just wondering what the solution is? Would it be putting Shane in Johnny's position?..... is the problem with Johnny or would everyone feel better if Shane was the "president" or leader of the pro players?

watchez;4312155[B said:
]Again CJ - your logic is flawed. [/B] The leader of the Pro Players doesn't have to be justified by who the best player is or who the most liked is. It should be someone that is QUALIFIED. If that makes it someone that SVB can give the 6 ball to, then so be it. If there is no Pro Player qualified then do what JCIN suggested - find someone outside of a pro that can do it.

In most major sports, it is a player or ex player that leads the group of pros. The most recognizable probably being Gene Upshaw in the NFL. Lebron is thinking about being voted upon to be the leader of the NBA players. Notice the word - voted. It is not a self appointment. And even Lebron thinks he may just be too busy to do it. I don't think he would be a good choice - he has nothing more than a high school education and some street smarts.

I was being factious about Shane....I'm 100% sure Shane doesn't want to be in a leadership position.....that's my logical, humorous input based on "signatures"

Golf owes a dept of gratitude to Arnold Palmer, Gary Player and Jack Nicklaus....if you've studied the history you'll agree with that statement. Arnold knew the key to golf's future was entertaining TV Shows and that's what they did with SHELL's Wonderful World of Golf......and the rest is history.

The players controlled their own business and could concentrate on key business issues that effected them directly from that moment on. 'Their Game was the Teacher'
 
Again CJ - your logic is flawed. The leader of the Pro Players doesn't have to be justified by who the best player is or who the most liked is. It should be someone that is QUALIFIED. If that makes it someone that SVB can give the 6 ball to, then so be it. If there is no Pro Player qualified then do what JCIN suggested - find someone outside of a pro that can do it.

In most major sports, it is a player or ex player that leads the group of pros. The most recognizable probably being Gene Upshaw in the NFL. Lebron is thinking about being voted upon to be the leader of the NBA players. Notice the word - voted. It is not a self appointment. And even Lebron thinks he may just be too busy to do it. I don't think he would be a good choice - he has nothing more than a high school education and some street smarts.

What pro pool should do is create a website for pro pool players. Then have anyone that is a pro or feels they are a pro, register on the site. There should be some criteria to what a pro pool player is. Then once everyone has registered, have people put there name in the hat to lead the players. They can post in a blog why they feel they are qualified, where they see the future of pro pool, etc. Then anyone that is registered gets to vote. Then you would have your leader. You can do this down the line for other officials within the organization as well.

But you don't state that Oscar Dominquez is the treasurer and post that to the public before you tell Oscar himself.


I agree the most qualified person should get the job, not the strongest player.


there is one more flaw, who is going to pay this person??, qualified people make $$$ they dont work for free, I dont-do you? nope.

So the flaw is not who, but how do they get paid, JA didnt get any $$$. FYI


And if this person decides to work for free, who will listen to him? and why should they?


its a mess alright....
 
Back
Top