Mike Dechaine, one of the top players in Maine, might be willing to go along and show the guys his trick racking techniques.
...
Im looking forward to Mondays gripe fest about Rodney Morris's shoelaces at the Japan Championships!
Chuck
IF these players had agreed to attend the Mosconi Cup even if not selected, then that is what they should do.
I 'think' I understand the synergy that Mark Wilson is trying to get going - and this type of momentum takes a few years to build.
I think this is a slap in the face of all the efforts that MatchRoom, Mark Wilson and others have put forth. And actions like this should be considered in future decisions.
What about the efforts that were expended - those would not been necessary if this outcome was known.
I understand the players might have legitimate reasons. WE don't know the details. But on the surface, this is a bad decision on the players part - and once again shows me what is partially wrong with the game in the US.
All of this was part of the foundation and rebuilding process. None of these players are owed anything - and I feel bad about how this makes the US look.
Too much ego - and if I was Mark Wilson, I would consider this an insult in what he was attempting to do. And I think this decision might affect other future decision.
This is my opinion. This is how I would feel if I was in Mark Wilson's shoes. Plus, I feel the presence of these 3 players could have helped the US team. Compare this to a 5 person team event that has 6 players at an event. The sixth player is still part of the team - something WE have obviously not learned yet.
Mark Griffin
10% of 20K = 2000
2000 / 3 = 667 each
Double that if it's 20% (=1334 each)
I can see why the "unchosen" might stay home: (1) little $, and (2) less recognition
........ and, (3) pride.
Team.
That's supposed to mean something.
There should be a pretty good reason to 'not' follow through on a plan that might affect 'the team'.
Don't make a commitment if you can't follow through. (Assuming a commitment was made or understood).
Plus - you are only as good as your word. I know that this is the kind of thing I would remember.
This is not an opportunity to bash pool - this is the chance to explain that personal gain is not the criteria when 'team' is involved.
Mark Griffin
OK I hear the Mosconi cup players who were not picked have now bailed out on the team. All of the people interviewed as potential players were asked if you are chosen to be in the potential group but are not on the final team will you still support the team and stick with it so the team can stay together. They all said yes but now they are all backing out.
Mark Wilson and Matchroom had arranged for them to be involved with active roles and it would have added a lot to our efforts. They would have been there for support and to show a totally united team America to the world. Some people in the pool world knocked the thought and the titles or roles they would have played such as coach or assistant. Whatever the team would have been more with them involved.
They would have had their expenses paid and also been paid a decent sum of money paid to them with it increasing if the team won. This expense and player payment was raised with effort by Mark Wilson. We would have had a much larger contingent in a tough environment where it will be very loud and almost all pro Europe.
So I wonder what will OSCAR DOMINGUEZ, JEREMY SOSSEI, BRANDON SHUFF be doing that is so time consuming where they do not have the schedule or perhaps the backbone to support the team if they are not actually playing. To finish what they started. Why did they not do what they said they would do, stick with the team and show some solidarity.
The losing team gets 20k correct? And the three not picked get 10% of that which is $2000x3= $6000 So the remaining 5 players plus at LEAST Mark Wilson as non playing coach have to split the remaining $12,000...That doesn't add up to me either...I didn't like that they were going to do that from the very beginning.
at least you used the correct their...
It's a moot point, a mute point would never be made...a moot point is a pointless point that is made.
Then they should follow up on their word. Than is a comparison...
Ok done with the grammar nazi'in (yes I know nazi'in isn't a word)
Jaden
Where was there commitment?
But you don't know if they agreed to go if they were not chosen. At least wait until you know more.
I find it difficult to condone on several levels the fact that these three players have decided not to go to Blackpool.
1. They were approached on whether they would go and continue as a solid TEAM and they agreed, Their presence in Blackpool would be valuable because it would have reinforced the team concept. There were genuine roles for them there. Sky Sports would have used them in guest commentary spots, off table features and as pundits. They would
also interact with the public. All these things giving worldwide exposure to both themselves, the US Team and the game.
But TEAM went out the window and they reverted to ME mode.
2 Mark, armed with their promise of solidarity persuaded Matchroom to pick up the tab for them. They would not do this unless they were convinced that it was a good idea,
3 They stood to pick up far more than any of them could earn for those 4/5 days.
The payment to the winning team is actually $32,000 and as the formula for sharing was decided when they were eight strong then it is not charity that they would receive (that's a lot of table recovering Big O).
4 This was an exercise in team building and Mark delivered but the players failed to understand the ethos of team spirit.
5 If they had any interest in the future of the game then why would they not want to be there?
Jam. I'm cheering for England.
Just cause I have Union Jack pillow cases.
And, I am eating Kippers for breakfast.
Top notch professional pool promoting... wait here it comes http://youtu.be/qoethxOp5Kg
It makes zero sense to me how you could not know wether or not they had committed to go, yet still come on here and further ruin the reputation of professional pool players, essentially ruining the reputation of your own product. It is no secret there are a lot of simpletons here who form their opinion based solely on what you say and it would be nice if you had all the facts before you make a statement.
I'm just going on the info posted , if they didn't say they would go then it's a mute point . If they did than they should follow up on thier word
1