Nasty's spelling skills are a learned tool..... wait nevermind...
donnys rack is a learned tool. corys soft break is a learned tool.shanes hard break in 10 ball is a learned tool.ernestos full cue jump is a learned tool.for anyone to say that they are not fair is just wrong in my opinion. Why you ask, becouse they took the time to LEARN how to do it! so before you condemn them for learning something the rest of us are to lazy or just dont want to learn is wrong. i say if you can learn something that gives you an edge its ok! when you introduce a new product like a "jumpstick" that takes away an aspect of the game like "kicking" it equilizes the game a bit now the lesser player can jump over instead of kick! that is my 2 cents!:thumbup:
donnys rack is a learned tool. corys soft break is a learned tool.shanes hard break in 10 ball is a learned tool.ernestos full cue jump is a learned tool.for anyone to say that they are not fair is just wrong in my opinion. Why you ask, becouse they took the time to LEARN how to do it! so before you condemn them for learning something the rest of us are to lazy or just dont want to learn is wrong. i say if you can learn something that gives you an edge its ok! when you introduce a new product like a "jumpstick" that takes away an aspect of the game like "kicking" it equilizes the game a bit now the lesser player can jump over instead of kick! that is my 2 cents!:thumbup:
95% of the "rack your own" advantage is removed if the opponent has the ability to place the 2-8 balls in their chosen order in the rack or require that those balls are placed in truly random fashion.
The reason "rack your own" is frowned upon by most people with the knowledge of why it is really done is the non-random aspect of the order of the balls in the rack meant to remove the random factor from the break and the subsequent runout.
If the opponent had the option of moving 4 of the 2-8 balls in the 9-ball rack to random positions in the rack and then letting Donnie rack the balls himself, but in that order, I am sure most people would think "rack your own" is a non-issue at that point because he is not going to be looking at the exact same runout after every break shot.
95% of the "rack your own" advantage is removed if the opponent has the ability to place the 2-8 balls in their chosen order in the rack or require that those balls are placed in truly random fashion.
The reason "rack your own" is frowned upon by most people with the knowledge of why it is really done is the non-random aspect of the order of the balls in the rack meant to remove the random factor from the break and the subsequent runout.
If the opponent had the option of moving 4 of the 2-8 balls in the 9-ball rack to random positions in the rack and then letting Donnie rack the balls himself, but in that order, I am sure most people would think "rack your own" is a non-issue at that point because he is not going to be looking at the exact same runout after every break shot.
95% of the "rack your own" advantage is removed if the opponent has the ability to place the 2-8 balls in their chosen order in the rack or require that those balls are placed in truly random fashion.
The reason "rack your own" is frowned upon by most people with the knowledge of why it is really done is the non-random aspect of the order of the balls in the rack meant to remove the random factor from the break and the subsequent runout.
If the opponent had the option of moving 4 of the 2-8 balls in the 9-ball rack to random positions in the rack and then letting Donnie rack the balls himself, but in that order, I am sure most people would think "rack your own" is a non-issue at that point because he is not going to be looking at the exact same runout after every break shot.
When was this?
I think it quite nitty that someone would develop the skill to rack, make the same ball on the break, have the same shot, with all the balls in virtually the same places, to be shot in the same pockets, and get out at a 95% clip AND NOT BE WILLING TO PLAY ANYONE IN THE WORLD FOR WHATEVER THEY WANT TO BET!!!
Oh wait, it's a little worse that this... YOU MUST COME TO HIM AND PLAY ON HIS TABLE SO HE KNOWS YOU CAN'T WIN.
Furthermore, I feel it equally nitty that such an individual would then offer to play a champion of some note (RODNEY) this way and OFFER THE LAST THREE...if he breaks down the middle. LOL!
Logically, this can only mean he knows he is the best in the world at this and all of these offers are gaffs.
In defense one player called out by Mr. Mills, I counter with the following:
JEREMY JONES would like to play DONNY MILLS on TAR
EVEN ONE POCKET (race to 25)
and
EVEN TEN BALL (race to 100; SARDO rack mandatory)
DONNY must come to HOUSTON because JEREMY officially refuses to fly to play DONNY.
Oh yeah, I almost forgot...10K per set
I think it quite nitty that someone would develop the skill to rack, make the same ball on the break, have the same shot, with all the balls in virtually the same places, to be shot in the same pockets, and get out at a 95% clip AND NOT BE WILLING TO PLAY ANYONE IN THE WORLD FOR WHATEVER THEY WANT TO BET!!!
Oh wait, it's a little worse that this... YOU MUST COME TO HIM AND PLAY ON HIS TABLE SO HE KNOWS YOU CAN'T WIN.
Furthermore, I feel it equally nitty that such an individual would then offer to play a champion of some note (RODNEY) this way and OFFER THE LAST THREE...if he breaks down the middle. LOL!
Logically, this can only mean he knows he is the best in the world at this and all of these offers are gaffs.
In defense one player called out by Mr. Mills, I counter with the following:
JEREMY JONES would like to play DONNY MILLS on TAR
EVEN ONE POCKET (race to 25)
and
EVEN TEN BALL (race to 100; SARDO rack mandatory)
DONNY must come to HOUSTON because JEREMY officially refuses to fly to play DONNY.
Oh yeah, I almost forgot...10K per set
Twice now you and I have spoke about you playing Larry Nevel and you wanted weight at the time which Larry agreed to. I gave you his number to contact him to setup the time and date and you never called.
That aside, I just got off the phone with Larry. If you wanna come to Beloit, WI and play on the Diamond table they have there, you got action. 10-ball, even, rack your own. Larry hasn't been playing lately so this should be pretty easy action for you if you can find your way out of Florida, which I'm sure you won't be able to for whatever reason.
No, I'm not staking the game, I'm just the messenger.
Let me know.
I completely understand Mr. Mills. Action is action and your game is very well respected.
Incidentally, I don't think Jeremy plays much rack your own either.
I see a 10 ball game in your future.