The greatest 9 ball player ever.

Do you have any more George Rood stories?

Modern day best I have seen Buddy, Earl and Efren play the best 9 ball , before them was Lassiter, Don Willis, Harold Worst Jimmy Moore , Joe Procita , Before them George Rood and the guy he said was the best player ever, Rags Fitzpatrick.
If you ever heard Billy Incardona talk about playing Efren and how he felt he could not handle his one pocket game {nobody could} thats how George spoke of Rags. {and George hated to admit anyone beat him, but he was honest about it when they did .
He told me a story about being with a bunch of the other old timers {probably at the One Pocket Hall Of Fame} and everyone was telling of all the players they beat, George said "I told them I didn't belong there and they said", "why not ", he said "I lost sometimes, you guys always won!"
George played Lassiter Mosconi Willis and lots of the other top players 100 dollar a game nine ball in the late 40s early 50s and he did not feel outgunned by anyone except Rags.
There was another guy he told me about in Norfolk around 1950 and he said he was a very old man when he played him and George was playing great pool at the time and barely won, the guy was Thomas Hueston who had to have been near 70 years old.
George said he hated to think how good the guy played when he was young.
 
From the late 80's to the late 90's,Playing 9ball tourneys...there was this one guy that everyone hoped they didn't draw and I mean everyone.Earl Strickland. He played the Gold Crowns like they were bar tables.He put more racks together back then,than anybody,not even close. Simonis took alot away from Earls game as did the Diamond tables..He would just jump the ball if he ever did get hooked.He didn't need a jump cue either:eek::wink: John B.

John is right! Earl did make the 9' Gold Crown look like a bar table. I never had that impression watching anyone else, not even Parica.
 
John is right! Earl did make the 9' Gold Crown look like a bar table. I never had that impression watching anyone else, not even Parica.

Building on this theme that Jay is talking about, while attempting to connect what people see today with what people are talking about when they're talking about the legends:

Often when we see Shane spike a ball from downtown, it comes off as very big deal and big shot and the crowd goes wild. And it is a big deal, big shot, don't get me wrong.

But Earl did that so often that it was just another Earl shot. He would rarely back away from a long, jacked up off angle shot and would simple spear it time and time again as if every professional is supposed to shoot that shot without fanfare.
 
I think the players are best qualified to pick.

Originally Posted by jay helfert View Post
I will say this as a fact, for nearly 20 years not one of the best players in the world, wanted to even discuss playing Parica for the cash. He gave weight to the world!

In 1984 at the Caesars Tahoe tournament, when everyone was raving about Parica and what he was doing to the US players, I heard Parica say, there is another player in the Philippines that is better.

I assume that in 1984, that would be Efren he was talking about.
 
Building on this theme that Jay is talking about, while attempting to connect what people see today with what people are talking about when they're talking about the legends:

Often when we see Shane spike a ball from downtown, it comes off as very big deal and big shot and the crowd goes wild. And it is a big deal, big shot, don't get me wrong.

But Earl did that so often that it was just another Earl shot. He would rarely back away from a long, jacked up off angle shot and would simple spear it time and time again as if every professional is supposed to shoot that shot without fanfare.


Earl can still swing it with a huge shot once in a while and the crowd goes crazy. He made a few like that in Vegas the last few days. Unfortunately, he also missed a few and that cost him dearly.

Changing the subject slightly, Keith also made very difficult shots look routine or easy. He just flicked his wrist and in the ball went and the cue ball took a perfect path for position. Keith was the greatest natural pool player I ever saw, with more talent than anyone ever! If he had the dedication of an Orcollo or Van Boening, he would have won everything.
 
Earl can still swing it with a huge shot once in a while and the crowd goes crazy. He made a few like that in Vegas the last few days. Unfortunately, he also missed a few and that cost him dearly.

Changing the subject slightly, Keith also made very difficult shots look routine or easy. He just flicked his wrist and in the ball went and the cue ball took a perfect path for position. Keith was the greatest natural pool player I ever saw, with more talent than anyone ever! If he had the dedication of an Orcollo or Van Boening, he would have won everything.

Grady said the same thing.
 
..in reading all the posts and all the different opinions about who was the best, it just occurred to me that maybe there is no one best player ever?
Maybe 5 or 6 of them on the same top rung who could beat each other on any given day...........that is my other opinion.......

It's fun to kick this around and hear stories and opinions but I think you are right.
 
My opinion is that Earl was the best 9-ball player I ever saw, but for those who say Efren coulda been considered if only he could break as well as Earl or others, I cannot forget how he came back from (was it 17 racks down?) behind in the Color of Money match in Hong Kong and beat Earl in 9-ball.
I suggest you watch that match if you want to see some of the best 9-ball you may ever see.

The point is Efren wouldn't have been down 17 racks in the first place, if he had a better break.

In that Color of Money match, Earl was consistently breaking and getting results. Efren was not. So even though Efren was playing well, he was at a huge disadvantage due to his break.

I echo your recommendation of watching that match. Cannot believe the high standard maintained throughout. It's mind boggling.

By the way, even though Efren won the race I was extremely disappointed that Earl was still in position to win it a few times and threw tantrums and somewhat gave up, too. A sad finale to an epic match.
 
..in reading all the posts and all the different opinions about who was the best, it just occurred to me that maybe there is no one best player ever?
Maybe 5 or 6 of them on the same top rung who could beat each other on any given day...........that is my other opinion.......

To be completely fair , you would have to judge , several ways .
Best gambling
Best tournaments
Best combined
Best natural
Best aided
Best on different size tables
Best single performance.
Thats too much for a sport that barely keeps records , and the ones they do are often incorrect.
I assume this thread was about the 1 standout player of all time, the problem is, who do you have judge?
You could let everyone judge , that means whoever got the most press and the most recent will have a distinct edge.
You could have only other "great" players judge , the problem with that is , old baggage from being beaten , girlfriend stolen etc. and great players never admit anyone ever beat them !
Some of them will not even pronounce the persons name correctly , even though you know they have been corrected a hundred times.
Prime example , Allen Hopkins called Efren Reyes, Effrem, for 25 years , not because he couldn't say Efren , but because he couldn't stand to say Efren, it would open up the wounds again.
Shane Van Bone is on the same lines, an attempt to diminish the threat by not even admitting the person exists.
I remember being at a tournament where all the champions of the 80s were and in walked Mark Tadd, looking like a million bucks and offered to play anybody.
No one got up.
He got on a table and started throwing them out and Jimmy Rempe started talking to him .
They talked for about an hour while Mark shot and I don't remember him ever missing.
He's not been on anyones list?
 
I think the players are best qualified to pick.

Originally Posted by jay helfert View Post
I will say this as a fact, for nearly 20 years not one of the best players in the world, wanted to even discuss playing Parica for the cash. He gave weight to the world!

In 1984 at the Caesars Tahoe tournament, when everyone was raving about Parica and what he was doing to the US players, I heard Parica say, there is another player in the Philippines that is better.

I remember Jose talking about a guy whos name started with an L , Lillith or something like that , he couldn't come to the US because he had a criminal record or something . It wasn't Luat, although he played awesome.
 
John is right! Earl did make the 9' Gold Crown look like a bar table. I never had that impression watching anyone else, not even Parica.
Building on this theme that Jay is talking about,...Earl did that so often that it was just another Earl shot. He would rarely back away from a long, jacked up off angle shot and would simple spear it time and time again as if every professional is supposed to shoot that shot without fanfare.

the absolute perfection of watching Earl execute is probably the single most motivating thing I can think of, as far as inspiring me to play. His vids are the only ones I have seen that instill that sense of an individual's domination of a game...nobody elas approached the ball with such purpose and utter knowledge that the balls would do what he wanted them to.

Not even Chuck Norris.

Its like Earl was built for pool.
 
...Mark Tadd, looking like a million bucks and offered to play anybody.
No one got up.
He got on a table and started throwing them out and Jimmy Rempe started talking to him .
They talked for about an hour while Mark shot and I don't remember him ever missing.
He's not been on anyones list?

mark was a bit of lightning though. He was gone as quickly as he came.

Compared to Buddy/ Jose/ Efren...he was a blip

IMO
 
Judging strictly by tournament results (a more objective and better documented record of performance than gambling results), Earl's high gear is the best I've ever seen, and you certainly can't argue with his overall tournament results, which I'm pretty sure are second to none. For consistency, though, I give the nod to Sigel. Those are my top two during my lifetime (so we're talking basically from the late 70's to today).
 
No one is the best all the time.

Earl told me that Jimmy Matz broke and ran 7 racks in a row on him for $50 a rack.

I can't really say who is the best. Whoever can see the balls and don't miss on that particular day is the best.
 
Danny Medina beat Jose for the cash playing 9 Ball.

That is very ture and there was no love loss between these two. In Fact there was something about Jose still owing pretty nicely.
While in Reno about 7-8 years ago there was yet another argument about it andI had to get between them and feared it would get nasty. I wwellknew how Danny played adn equally knew how well he handled himself in a parking lot.
As has been said,"in God we trust, all others must post"!!
 
That is very ture and there was no love loss between these two. In Fact there was something about Jose still owing pretty nicely.
While in Reno about 7-8 years ago there was yet another argument about it andI had to get between them and feared it would get nasty. I wwellknew how Danny played adn equally knew how well he handled himself in a parking lot.
As has been said,"in God we trust, all others must post"!!

So Jose didn't pay off....

That lowers him some in my book.

Ken
 
Earl was the best tournament 9-Ball player I ever saw. He ran more racks than anyone, match after match. I put Sigel second,

I agree somewhat. But I would put Sigel ahead of Earl. Earl might be strong in a race to say 11-13. But Sigel would not crack in a long race. And NOBODY come with the very tough and high pressure shots like Sigel.

Sigel would also be a 5 time US Open champion if the 2 he won before the name change was included....

Efren (having played Earl many many times as well in the 80s, 90s, as we know), has also said Sigel was the toughest 9 ball player he has ever played (even to present).
 
Regardless of who thinks who is the best, the real question is why Parica is not in the Hall of Fame.

Apparently, this is the reason...

In Fact there was something about Jose still owing pretty nicely. While in Reno about 7-8 years ago there was yet another argument about it and I had to get between them and feared it would get nasty.

So Jose didn't pay off....

That lowers him some in my book.

Ken
 
Back
Top