maybe, but they definitely change the range of shots available to the player which IMHO is BS. OK the argument is that you can still play all of the shots HOWEVER the percentage of getting all of them is dramatically reduced with tight pockets. Is this a good thing?
Agree. It's totally ruined pool IMO. What does tight pockets actually do (to non-world class players) which I'd guess comprise 99.999% percent of the pool playing population?
1. Slow down play. Not just overall, but most players tend to spend longer time on each individual shot. Which is IMO annoying.
2. Reduce amount of spectacular shots. Sure you could still make them, but the percentage is so low, that players who actually do get "weeded out" in a Darwinian process.
3. More safety play. I'm aware that some people find safety play thrilling. Those are the guys who play 9 safeties in a 9 ball match on a bar box...A great safety is a beautiful thing. 9 mediocre ones who only works because of pocket size are not (snooker style t-safes etc)
4. Scaring off beginners. After some beginners have spent 30 minutes hardly pocketing a ball, they get fed up. On a slightly higher level, even a B-player can get embarrassed by 4 inch pockets. You basically have to play every day to run out consistently on those. We want new blood, remember? Not just the poolhall bums with nowhere to go.
5. Alter shot selection. More rolling. Makes for ultimate specator boredom.
6. Fewer balls made on the break, depending on break rules. With a magic rack and 1 on the spot, this may not come in as much. But 8 ball...definitely, also 9 on the spot 9 ball etc.
7. Making balls on banks, kicks etc goes way down. Not only do they tend not to go more often, but close ones hang, punishing anyone foolish enough to try. So more safes....
8 I'd like to talk about something that's not mentioned a whole lot, but tightening side pockets is one of the worst things you can possibly do! For someone like myself, who play mostly straight pool, the sidepockets are very important to build patterns and of course to bail me out on occation. Tight side pockets can sometimes reject shots that are good, solely because of speed. It completely alters the game, the patterns etc and not for the better. It actually makes shots that are possible on a normal (not huge buckets) table completely physically impossible to make. To me, there is no upside to that, especially since it makes the alternative to these shots (banks) tougher also.
15 years ago, when I started playing pool seriously, we played on 5 inch pockets here. Maybe those were a tad too big, though I'd still recommend them for beginner play. 4 3/4 would have been better for most players perhaps. It was fun when I was a beginner, because I actually stood a chance at running out. Many of the best players from that time are still around, and you know what? They are still the best. In the pool pecking order, nothing changed by the pocket size. Only shot selection! So we get the same guys winning, and more boring pool. The only winner is the piss poor player who took forever to shoot even on 5 inch pockets, with no stroke and super defensive playing style. He is somewhat redeemed now that taking time and playing lots of safes is considered more legitimate and is done a little more by the better players. Of course he still loses, but he does marginally better overall I guess. At least he's not embarrased by the great players putting sixpacks on him and shooting amazing stroke shots that he couldn't do in a million years. He is also helped by faster rails, because before he couldn't get around the table to save his life. Now he occationally can.