Willie's run was on a 4x8...not a 5x10. 339 is nowhere near close to 2nd place. There are many 400+ runs out there. Schmidt, Hopkins, Strickland, Nagy, etc....
Continuous is the operative word...
you maybe right on the 4x8 v. 5x10 but Willie certainly spent a lot of time on the 5x10's... not sure Wikipedia is right on that one; pretty sure I read 5x10, but its moot anyway... notwithstanding the cloth they played on then was like canvas, nothing like the 860 that has found its way from billiards to pool tables...
I know Schmidt ran a continuous run of something like 272 in straight pool because its on tape/dvd; but I have not seen anything else to-date to support a 400 ball continuous run in straight pool by anybody... does not mean it has not happened, but I would bet money that Earl Strickland never ran any where near that in straight pool... he's the 9-ball guru, although he has recent 10-ball & 8 ball wins in big tournaments...
saw him run 13 straight 9 ball racks once though in competition...
Rempe ran some 200+ during some tournament if I recall correctly, which is how he got his King James nickname I understand...
Mizerak played Grady in a race to 1000 and beat Grady 1000 to -something like 334 but neither had a continuous run of more than 150 in that money game... (straight-pool) Mizerak wrote in one of his books "Grady can't spell straight-pool" but he's the best one-pocket player that ever lived...
Mike & Willie's info is in the record books and Mike was the youngest ever to be inducted into the hall of fame...
I would be interested in any documented, official 400+ball continuous runs in straight pool though if you have any info post up...
I would imagine a 400 + ball run would be possible in 9-ball, but 44+ racks without a miss, and 44+ racks without failing to pocket a ball on the break would be nothing short of a miracle... since the best breakers in 9-ball are only hitting 60% as far as I have been able to find thus far...
the last few US Open 9-ball tournaments I watched I don't think anybody ran more than 4 or 5 racks in a row...
thanks in advance.