Madisonbob Untrusting Client Snowmon34

I Don't See How ANYONE Can Take Bob's Side In This Deal

ShootingArts said:
I have problems pretty much all the way along the line with this deal looking at it from a distance. The cues were actually merry widows with two shafts. $395 would have been very cheap for those so $350 seems odd. If someone sends me a check for less than I am expecting, I tell them immediately. Apparently Bob didn't. He was having other issues, still seems odd. Three guys going in together on one deal and two dropping out seems odd. Did Dale put $525 down or $175 and he is trying to get back $525? Seems odd. If Dale did have two committed partners yet put down more himself for a down payment than his completed stick was supposed to cost, well that seems odd too. If the other two guys put up $175 each, backing out and losing their deposits seems odd.
Hu

Well, I've read all the posts in both threads and here's what snowmon/Dale said about the down payment:

"...His (Bob's) exact reply was 350.00 each under 2 conditions....the 1st condition was that I had to send him half down on the order...that sounded reasonable considering he was giving us 25.00 off per cue, and the 2nd condition was that I didn't tell anybody what I payed for the cues, again a simple request that I had no problem with. Well Bob quoted me a delivery time of 3 months once he received my down payment....I sent Bob a down payment of 525.00 (3 x 350.00 is 1050.00 half of course is 525.00 the balance of 525.00 + shipping would be paid on completion ) via usps on 6/01/07...."
<snippage>

"So I gave it 3 weeks called them back and Darlena Bob's wife said they would send me pics of the cue's on completion....she also stated that they lost the paper work on my deal and if I would email them a copy of the down payment...( again strange business practices)..."



The down payment money was explained to MY satisfaction, but the part that really makes me rule in Dale's favor is that after all that time has passed, Bob CONVENIENTLY loses ALL the paperwork. What a crock of kaa-kaa. Bob sucks and his 'jew' remark only makes him suck even more.... imo

Doug


.
 
Last edited:
lets give Bob a break!

Recently some guy posts here about a cuemaker who makes some promises,takes his deposit,quits responding to his emails, so he resorts to posting - he gets bashed 7 ways from sunday. You would think he threatened motherhood and apple pie. Most defended the cue maker cause he had some personal problems etc..(nothing wrong with that)

Guys were lining up to pay for that cue.

Now we have a similar situation and its the cuemaker being bashed for everything. The guy tries to respond and he is pounced on for everything from his sentence structure to his lack of trust. He was also guilty of not being PC (we all knew what he meant though)

Bob points out that he has had some health issues too. I may have missed it but I don't think 1 person told him about the important things in life. How he oughta be taking it easy and don't worry about such mundane things as cue making etc.... - what the heck is wrong with that dang persnicitey snowmon34?

I'm curious as to why such a different attitude in what seems to be such a similar situation. (different people responding?)


My guess is Snowmon34 and Bob are both reasonable people.

these issues are seldom entirely black or white but mostly some shade of gray


Bob I wish you well and hope you return to good health - .
I'm told you make a heck of a cue.

Snowmon34 I hope this all works out for you too

I'm just making the observation - I'm sure somehow I am way out a line here - but someone will let me know it.
 
snowmon34 said:
Bob I appologize, but I can't keep up with your post. Heres the deal Bob...send the 2 remaining cues to Dave Hughes..against my better judgement I will pay you 375.00 a piece plus shipping......750 - 525 ( my deposit ) = 225 . I will give Dave 225.00 + 20.00 for shipping once I inspect the cues....do not ask for the money up front because it's not going to happen...you have proven to be untrustworthy!!!What are the odds that Bob will come through with this request?????Now FYI .....Bob keeps calling these cues special order cues to my specs.....here are the specs which I consider industry standards...

2 Bacote sneaky blanks
1 purpleheart sneaky blank
Builder undisclosed ( I'm positive Bob didn't build the blanks they were hanging in his shop)
3 pack of rings non specified I left the rings up to Bob
13 mm ferrules ( bob said the largest he could do was 12.90 with his taper)
weight 19-19.3 oz
balance point 19-20 inches
Pin ( whatever bob uses )
Taper ( whatever bob's standard taper )

these cue's sound real special dont they??? They are sneaky petes with rings Bob!!!

I'm trying to figure this out. You paid him for one cue, you buddies backed out of the deal for the other two but you are now going to pay him for all three. $1125 for three cues, Is that the deal?
 
HUH ? Is NOT An Answer

gesan said:
I'm curious as to why such a different attitude in what seems to be such a similar situation. (different people responding?)

I'm just making the observation - I'm sure somehow I am way out a line here - but someone will let me know it.



You ARE way out of line. I'm right and you're WRONG. You lack reading comprehension.
Doug
( if it turns out that I'M WRONG and you're proven to be right, I will simply Delete my previous post and change sides ) :)
 
sixpack said:
Yes, I understand the differences. However, if the cuemaker was making a cue to sell on spec, he would make it differently. the fact that he has a product at the end does not mean that he did not suffer a loss. He would have spent his time more lucratively by building a cue that would
a) sell for more and
b) appeal to more people and possibly
c) be easier to make.

My main point was that maybe there is a different way to structure the contract or the way they do business to avoid this situation.

In real estate, if a person backs out of a purchase contract for no reason, then they forfeit their deposit, even though the seller still has the house.

Same thing with custom built homes. If the builder builds the home for someone and that person later cancels without a valid reason, they forfeit their deposit, even though the builder still owns the house.

The main thing is that the cuemaker's time is valuable, and he wouldn't have necessarily spent it making those cues without the deposit. Therefore he changed his plans for a 'sure thing'. If he later has to try and find a buyer for that product, his costs are higher...and there is no guarantee that anyone will want to purchase it.

In fact, every example I can think of, if you pay a deposit and then later decide that you don't want the end product, you forfeit all or some of your deposit. Cuemaking seems to be the exception, not the rule.

Try having a tailor build you a suit. Think he'll give you your deposit back when the suit is done? Nope. He can sell it to someone your size though.

What about having your mechanic rebuild a transmission for you and then backing out? He'll still charge you for the time, even though he could sell it to someone with your same model car.

Anybody who does custom work gets paid for their time, except apparently cuemakers. To me it seems like cuemakers are skilled craftsmen who should be paid for time commissioned on custom projects, just like every other skilled profession.

~rc
I agree with your assertions except for a couple of things. First, I don't know that the nonrefundable deposit should be 50%, as was the case here, because EVERY cue is resellable. I am thinking it is really more like a restocking fee than anything. 15% is your typical restocking fee, although I can see 25% being necessary for some cues.

Second, a nonrefundable deposit can only be ok if the cuemaker satifies their end of the bargain, which includes delivery within the specified time range. Nobody should have to accept a cue that is ready months or years after they were promised they would have it. Cancelling because a deadline was not met is not cancelling for "no reason." The courts agree.

The same thing applies to all of the examples you gave above. You are not expected to have to take your home, suit or transmission if they cannot be delivered within the promised timeframe. Can you imagine having to accept your home/suit/transmission months or years after it was promised? You shouldn't have to do it with cues either.
 
And while RE deposits may be nonrefundable, that should only be in the situation where there were no serious undisclosed fault found during expert inspection, correct ? Like tax law, common law doesn't always follow logic, so such comparisons between different principles of contract law doesn't always work. Lesson: use a PO.

tim
 
This post is funny in a pathetic sort of way. Seems pretty simple. If Dale didn't send the right down payment, Bob should have brought it to his attention right away.

I know Bob has been sick. This is not Dale's problem, period. If a person is going to be a business person, there has to be a separation between his personal life and the business.

I had a grandmother die a couple of years ago while I had several deals working on Ebay. It took about five minutes to contact my buyers and explain what had happened. Everyone was very understanding, as we all have personal lives and family, etc.. What they wouldn't have understood is a lack of communication.

How many times during any given day do you think that you're dealing with anyone that doesn't have their own set of personal problems? Customers and cuemakers are both human.

This deal could have been avoided with a simple worksheet that both parties could approve prior to commencement of work. If you want to see something professional in Cue
World, order a cue from Bob Flynn at Denali. All parties know every detail about what's being expected from the down payment to all materials, weights, sizes, etc.. He even quotes a due date for the cue (that he actually hits, no less!). I know that lots of people think this kind of paperwork is a hassle, but it beats having the kind of misunderstanding that we have here.

Steve
 
gesan said:
Recently some guy posts here about a cuemaker who makes some promises,takes his deposit,quits responding to his emails, so he resorts to posting - he gets bashed 7 ways from sunday. You would think he threatened motherhood and apple pie. Most defended the cue maker cause he had some personal problems etc..(nothing wrong with that)

Guys were lining up to pay for that cue.

Now we have a similar situation and its the cuemaker being bashed for everything. The guy tries to respond and he is pounced on for everything from his sentence structure to his lack of trust. He was also guilty of not being PC (we all knew what he meant though)

Bob points out that he has had some health issues too. I may have missed it but I don't think 1 person told him about the important things in life. How he oughta be taking it easy and don't worry about such mundane things as cue making etc.... - what the heck is wrong with that dang persnicitey snowmon34?

I'm curious as to why such a different attitude in what seems to be such a similar situation. (different people responding?)


My guess is Snowmon34 and Bob are both reasonable people.

these issues are seldom entirely black or white but mostly some shade of gray


Bob I wish you well and hope you return to good health - .
I'm told you make a heck of a cue.

Snowmon34 I hope this all works out for you too

I'm just making the observation - I'm sure somehow I am way out a line here - but someone will let me know it.
Gesan, I can only speak for myself but I will try to answer your question. I happen to feel the other cuemaker being referenced has NOT given the effort that he should have to satisfy his obligations, and has not handled his situation well at all.

The key difference though is that the other cuemaker accepts full responsibility for his shortcomings and has promised to make everything right, albeit much slower than he should. Because of this I am "cutting him some slack," instead of bashing on him for his downfalls and the lack of speed and effort in which he is getting it handled. At a certain point though enough will be enough and the courtesy of the extra patience being shown to him will wear thin if not taken care of.

Now Mr Griffin on the other hand is not accepting any responsibility for a situation that is entirely his fault, even if it were beyond his control. He is choosing to be difficult to work with, and is trying to work the deal so that all of the inconvenience will lie on the customer instead of himself. In fact IMO, he is even trying to scam Snowmon34 for more money so that the customer ends up helping to cover any costs or inconveniences resulting from problems that are his.
 
Poolplaya9 said:
I agree with your assertions except for a couple of things. First, I don't know that the nonrefundable deposit should be 50%, as was the case here, because EVERY cue is resellable. I am thinking it is really more like a restocking fee than anything. 15% is your typical restocking fee, although I can see 25% being necessary for some cues.

Second, a nonrefundable deposit can only be ok if the cuemaker satifies their end of the bargain, which includes delivery within the specified time range. Nobody should have to accept a cue that is ready months or years after they were promised they would have it. Cancelling because a deadline was not met is not cancelling for "no reason." The courts agree.

The same thing applies to all of the examples you gave above. You are not expected to have to take your home, suit or transmission if they cannot be delivered within the promised timeframe. Can you imagine having to accept your home/suit/transmission months or years after it was promised? You shouldn't have to do it with cues either.


Yep. In any contract, the person breaking the contract is the one who loses. So if the cues are not done by the date specified, then they would be out of contract and the buyer would be due his retainer/deposit back.

And I agree that 50% might be too high a number.

Also, now that I've read the other thread and thought about it a little more, it appears that Bob would have been in violation of the contract for the delayed delivery and the buyer was within his rights to demand his deposit back.

However, it's all moot because it was a verbal (he said-she said) agreement anyway.

The lesson I think folks should take away is that in this day and age, you should have a contract that clearly specifies who, what, when and where and what happens if the terms are violated. If you don't, then there is nothing anybody else can do except try to make a decision about who is the better liar.

~rc
 
stikapos said:
And while RE deposits may be nonrefundable, that should only be in the situation where there were no serious undisclosed fault found during expert inspection, correct ? Like tax law, common law doesn't always follow logic, so such comparisons between different principles of contract law doesn't always work. Lesson: use a PO.

tim

In RE it varies state to state and according to the contract, but in general, the buyer has a time period (called the contingency period) during which they make inspections, obtain financing and in general do due diligence to determine if the property is a good purchase for them. During that time period, they can withdraw from the contract without penalty. But, after they agree to move forward, if they back out then they forfeit their deposit. Which in CA is limited to 3% of the purchase price. (with some exceptions)

If the seller decides to back out, the buy can force specific performance, meaning that they can force the seller to sell it to them anyway. In some cases, the buyer can be forced to purchase as well.

The specifics are all determined in the contract.

And your lesson is spot on.

Cheers,
~rc
 
sixpack said:
Y

However, it's all moot because it was a verbal (he said-she said) agreement anyway.

Oral contracts are enforceable in court...

Maybe not easily, but they can be won.
 
I want you all to know that Bob qouted me a price of 350.00 per sneaky. I ordered 3 sneakys from Bob.....Bob required that I send him 50% down before he started the project....the total for 3 sneakys was 1050.00 + shipping fees...I sent Bob a check for 525.00 on 6/01/07.....Bob cashed the check with no issues...The down payment and price discrepancy came up 8 months later......do you guys really think I would try and swindle Bob out of 75.00 ( 25.00 a cue ) to risk losing my total down payment of 525.00....not going to happen please read this thread.


http://forums.azbilliards.com/showthread.php?t=90423
 
thanks man

ShootingArts said:
I couldn't read Bob's post either so I imported it into my e-mail editor and whacked it up into paragraphs. I also did some rough editing. Hopefully I kept what Bob was trying to say. I am cutting and pasting my version of Bob's post here simply so it can be read by those interested.

I'm not going to try to comment on the right or wrong of the matter. As usual in these messes, it seems that communications were an issue throughout the deal.

Hu


(included text)
HEY EVERYBODY WHATS UP? OLD Dale has forgotten a few things so he runs to the forum for some approval. The old boy calls me up, he wanted 3 sneakys all special order stuff exotic woods and ringwork and weights and balances and so on. I quoted $375.00 a cue plus shipping. I told him I could at that time not promise him a direct time of completion because I have a health problem and I had just had a problem with a guy that had told me to take my time only to later blast me all over the forums with downright lies.

Keep in mind I've built cues for 15 years at that point with a total of 1 complaint which happened at the time of my health problems uprising but has since been taken care of. I just got behind, I was too sick. well dale was supposed to send me half down but he only sent $525.00 I went and started the cues I had told him it would be maybe 2 months to 6 months time because of some back orders and again sickness problems about a month to 2 months went by he called saying him or his friends who had went in on the cues with him had seen the forum about the 1 problem I ever had with a customer that I can remember saying it concerned him and them. I reassured him he had nothing to worry about and he seemed okay. About 2 weeks later he called wanting to know if the cues were done. I said no he asked if I would send pics. That upset me because it made me feel he no longer trusted me. I send the pics, he said he wanted more pics of the ringwork. I said if I could free up the time, I did not.

He called about twice over the next 2 months asking about the cues which they were not done. Then about 2 to 3 weeks later I called him saying they're done please send the remaining balance. Our contract was $375.00 a cue half down which was not paid in full the rest before the cues were shipped. He wanted me to ship the cues to him then he would pay. I refused. Then he wanted COD. I refused so I offered him to pay thru paypal. He says no then he informs me his 2 partners have backed out and he needs pics of the cues completed to try to get them to become reinterested. At the time my camera was completely destroyed. We had to search everywhere all over town to find a camera to match our software or come up with $300.00 for a new one.

We got lucky and found one we could use and sent him the pics. He said they look great give him a day or 2 to confide in his friends. He comes back and said just send me my down payment back I have changed my mind. Now keep in mind I built these to his specs special order his size shafts wood and ringwork. These sneaky have a finish to kill for like most high dollar cues. I have called him on my dollar at least 10 times, e-mailed countless times, sent pics several times, started the cues without a full down payment, put up with him calling me dishonest finishing the cues, now he wants all of the down payment back. So get this, I must now sale these cues to pay him back a down payment that I feel he owes me some cash out of. If I must resale his special ordered cues to pay for them for him then I should get paid a sales commission of 25 percent. Really my policy has always been no returns on any custom made cues after down payment is made. As we were discussing shipping and paying the overall price was never mentioned but when I mentioned the total cost that is when he says well you're lying the downpayment shows the price was double that amount because you said to send half down but dale was trying to jew me down that day and he did get me down to $375.00 from $390.00 with 2 shafts which is my reg. price. He tried the $350.00 but I refused.

Does everyone think I should return him all his money or a portion? I wish to be fair about this but hell guys try doing everything I did to find out a old boy don't have all the money to pay for what he's had you work your ass off to improve his pool game for. It would be like all you all going out here and working all week even doing extras for the boss because he distrust you over what some else has said that's untrue then finding out that it didn't matter that you tried to prove yourself because the boss says well hell I can't pay you anyway, or pay you half but want it back even though you done the whole job plus extras for him and have to sale the cues to make his money back and eat phone bills, emailing time, and the reselling of the special made cues.

Buy a house, pay half down, the builder gets done and wants the rest you say I don't want it my partners got out on me. They will auction it off if it sales a $100,000 less than you owe. Guess what, you still owe the rest plus interest, auction costs, late fees, and so on but everybody should not want a cue builder to work for nothing then attack him without knowing the whole story. I will work with Dale but he wants me to do all the work for nothing. Remember all he's done here is order cues I worked and completed them. He refuses cues never seeing them so I work trying to collect adding to my phone bills, using my time, and contacting buyers for cues I was supposed to already have been paid for and yea defending myself for him not wanting to pay for the products he had made special for himself. Please give me a break guys. It's enough just to build a nice hitting and looking cues for the price I sell them for. I run my prices on the edge. This kind of stuff only drives the cost up for what I believe cue builders will be calling just in case money. I must say that everyone I've ever dealt with has always been fair.

I have I guess 2 overall complaints now in 15 years. That's all I can remember and its all been in the last year. One was my fault for getting sick. This one, hell I don't know, I guess he's broke. Dale we need to work this out. I have never screwed anyone out of a red cent; I am 44 years old. I don't plan on it but lets be fair here. You had me do a job. I did it. Your buddies backed out. You had me do all kinds of extra stuff that most cue builders wouldn't mess with for the cost of a sneaky. Too, you questioned my morals and let me know you distrusted me over hearsay. You forced me to run up my phone bills. You lied about the overall cost of the cues or maybe and I mean maybe misunderstood at least. You've threatened me. You refused $225.00 I said I would send you since one cue is sold and offered you more when another sold. What else do you want I have so far done everything I think anyone would or could do. I really believe you need help Dale

I am serious, with your distrusting issues and your unreasonable disposition boarding on self-centeredness I would think you get on a forum attack a guy for him screwing you out of a downpayment he already at that point had offered you money back. You then threaten me with the A.G. What are you going to tell them yeah the guy won't pay me but his policy for 15 years is no down payment returned on any custom cues but he did say he sold for me one of the cues and offered me $225.00 and said he has a lead on another sale and he would then pay me more but I told him no I didn't want it that way. I want it all at once now and refused the money. Well these are the facts some of the time period may be off but for the most part it is the story. Man this crying on these forums is I think bad for the sport it took me 15 years to build my business a lot of long hours and these guys get on here and attack people telling half truths or getting involved in stuff they know nothing of destroying peoples good reps. It should be against the law as slander. Please remembers there's 2 sides and the truth is the truth.

Madison Bob

my cues play great but my enlish writing skills suck thanks for doing it up for me. And yes this forum should be for better things like bringing people into the sport i tryed to keep from coming on here but everybody wants to attack people and try to ruin the reps insteed of working it out together. bob
 
Poolplaya9 said:
I agree with your assertions except for a couple of things. First, I don't know that the nonrefundable deposit should be 50%, as was the case here, because EVERY cue is resellable. I am thinking it is really more like a restocking fee than anything. 15% is your typical restocking fee, although I can see 25% being necessary for some cues.

Second, a nonrefundable deposit can only be ok if the cuemaker satifies their end of the bargain, which includes delivery within the specified time range. Nobody should have to accept a cue that is ready months or years after they were promised they would have it. Cancelling because a deadline was not met is not cancelling for "no reason." The courts agree.

The same thing applies to all of the examples you gave above. You are not expected to have to take your home, suit or transmission if they cannot be delivered within the promised timeframe. Can you imagine having to accept your home/suit/transmission months or years after it was promised? You shouldn't have to do it with cues either.

i never give a completion date because of health reason he agreed. madison bob
 
Bob

Send Dave Hughes the cues......I will pay him the 375.00 + shipping fees that you want ..If you won't do this....send me my deposit back...please respond.

Dale
 
Give His Money Back Now!!!!!

"?This post is funny in a pathetic sort of way. Seems pretty simple. If Dale didn't send the right down payment, Bob should have brought it to his attention right away.

I know Bob has been sick. This is not Dale's problem, period. If a person is going to be a business person, there has to be a separation between his personal life and the business."

I CAN'T STAND POEPLE THAT SKATE AROUND A SUBJECT MAKING EXCUSES FOR EVERYTHING AND CHANGING THE STORY TO FIT THERE THINKING. I AGREE, THE DOWN PAYMENT ISSUE SHOULD HAVE BEEN ADDRESSED WHEN THE CHECK WAS RECIEVED, AT THAT POINT BOB SHOULD HAVE CALLEDAND ASKED ABOUT IT. SOMEONE CAN ONLY PLAY THE HEALTH CARD FOR SO LONG..... YOU EITHER CAN OR CAN'T DELIVER 8 MONTHS FOR A SNEAKY PETE IS WAY OUT OF LINE, THIS GENTLEMAN IS DUE HIS MONEY BACK!!! YOU CANT TAKE A MANS DOWN PAYMENT AND KEEP IT THIS IS CALLED LARCNCY BY CONVERSION AND EVEN IF YOU ARE FROM ANOTHER STATE YOU CAN STILL SUE SOMEONE . THIS WHOLE THING IS SO SMIPLE BOB SHOULD OVERNIGHT A CASHIERS CHECK IN FULL TO THIS GENTLEMAN AND STOP WITH ALL THE BS!!!!! DO RIGHT THING AND SEND HIS MONEY BACK BE A MAN LIVE UP TO WHAT IS RIGHT... I FIND IF A PROBLEM COMES UP I GET ON THE PHONE AND
DO WHATEVER I CAN TO FIX IT BEFORE IT GETS OUT OF HAND AFTER ALL THIS TIME AND NO CONTACT YOU KNOW HE HAS KNOW INTENTION OF PAYING YOU . I CAN ALSO SAY FROM A PAST DEALING WITH BOB HE TWISTED THE WHOLE STORY OUT OF WHACK TO FIT HIS OWN WAY OF THINKING
SO WHEN I READ THIS I THOUGHT HERE IT GOES AGAIN!

PAY HIM BACK
 
brianna187 said:
"?This post is funny in a pathetic sort of way. Seems pretty simple. If Dale didn't send the right down payment, Bob should have brought it to his attention right away.

I know Bob has been sick. This is not Dale's problem, period. If a person is going to be a business person, there has to be a separation between his personal life and the business."

I CAN'T STAND POEPLE THAT SKATE AROUND A SUBJECT MAKING EXCUSES FOR EVERYTHING AND CHANGING THE STORY TO FIT THERE THINKING. I AGREE, THE DOWN PAYMENT ISSUE SHOULD HAVE BEEN ADDRESSED WHEN THE CHECK WAS RECIEVED, AT THAT POINT BOB SHOULD HAVE CALLEDAND ASKED ABOUT IT. SOMEONE CAN ONLY PLAY THE HEALTH CARD FOR SO LONG..... YOU EITHER CAN OR CAN'T DELIVER 8 MONTHS FOR A SNEAKY PETE IS WAY OUT OF LINE, THIS GENTLEMAN IS DUE HIS MONEY BACK!!! YOU CANT TAKE A MANS DOWN PAYMENT AND KEEP IT THIS IS CALLED LARCNCY BY CONVERSION AND EVEN IF YOU ARE FROM ANOTHER STATE YOU CAN STILL SUE SOMEONE . THIS WHOLE THING IS SO SMIPLE BOB SHOULD OVERNIGHT A CASHIERS CHECK IN FULL TO THIS GENTLEMAN AND STOP WITH ALL THE BS!!!!! DO RIGHT THING AND SEND HIS MONEY BACK BE A MAN LIVE UP TO WHAT IS RIGHT... I FIND IF A PROBLEM COMES UP I GET ON THE PHONE AND
DO WHATEVER I CAN TO FIX IT BEFORE IT GETS OUT OF HAND AFTER ALL THIS TIME AND NO CONTACT YOU KNOW HE HAS KNOW INTENTION OF PAYING YOU . I CAN ALSO SAY FROM A PAST DEALING WITH BOB HE TWISTED THE WHOLE STORY OUT OF WHACK TO FIT HIS OWN WAY OF THINKING
SO WHEN I READ THIS I THOUGHT HERE IT GOES AGAIN!

PAY HIM BACK


Lee,

I have agreed to pay the inflated price of 375.00 per cue.....I wonder why Bob won't respond to my request to finalize the deal.......Bob lets complete this transaction.....I'm giving you everything you want.

Dale
 
bob griffin said:
i never give a completion date because of health reason he agreed. madison bob

bob griffin said:
...i had told him it would be maybe 2 months to 6 months time because of some back orders and again sickness problems...
That second quote was taken directly from this thread posted by you early today:
http://forums.azbilliards.com/showthread.php?t=90524

Bob, you sir are a real piece of work.

Now the question is, how are YOU going to resolve this Bob? Dale has offered to pay your inflated price if you ship the cues to a trusted person that you both know. This is way more than reasonable on his part. So are you going to make ANY effort to resolve this problem Bob?
 
i never agreed to a finish date do to illness

sixpack said:
Yep. In any contract, the person breaking the contract is the one who loses. So if the cues are not done by the date specified, then they would be out of contract and the buyer would be due his retainer/deposit back.

And I agree that 50% might be too high a number.

Also, now that I've read the other thread and thought about it a little more, it appears that Bob would have been in violation of the contract for the delayed delivery and the buyer was within his rights to demand his deposit back.

However, it's all moot because it was a verbal (he said-she said) agreement anyway.

The lesson I think folks should take away is that in this day and age, you should have a contract that clearly specifies who, what, when and where and what happens if the terms are violated. If you don't, then there is nothing anybody else can do except try to make a decision about who is the better liar.

~rc
i never agreed to a finish date do to heart problems at the time dale ordered i was just getting caught back up. i told him i would try to work them in here and there to finish them at a reasonable time. most cue builders such as myself are behind a year are more i believe my future holds contract orders only. were the down payment is held for earnest money like the sale of a house you don,t pay the rest you loose the down payment. its hard to sometimes fill orders on time the woods all don,t act the same when cut some must sit longer than others to overcome stress pulling at the grain do to oil content of the woods and grain structure of certain woods. madison bob
 
Back
Top