Long post, but I like math and pool.What separates a 300 ball runner from a 600 ball runner? I think at that level it’s much less about technical skill (Shane, Ruslan, all these guys have that in spades) and purely a feat of extreme stamina/focus. In one of Schmidt’s videos he talks about knowing when to treat some shots as easy and just knock them in, while conserving your mental energy for tougher shots — he seems to have mastered the mental side of the high run as much as the technical. Hopefully Shane can dig deep and post a monster number.
Attempts is the only thing separating them. Another person already mentioned flipping coins (i.e. even odds taken) will eventually hit any number of consecutive outcomes if attempted enough times. For example, if you flip a coin one billion times it should come up heads 30 times in a row.
Using Shane's runs the first day, we can figure this out statistically. They did not publish every run, so we have to estimate the average. He had 7 runs over 90. Even assuming he made no balls on the other attempts, this is an average of 60 balls. If he cleared just one rack the average goes to 70. That is conservative. This would mean that he has an even chance to run 70 balls (again a conservative estimate). Let's look at how this works out in odds/attempts using math rather than guessing/opinions:
Every 4 attempts he should run 140 (Shane ran >140 in 4 out of 18)
Every 8 attempts he should run over 210 (he ran >210 in 2 out of 18)
The small sample size and outcomes seem to support the idea that this is a normal population of events. If 70 is the average, then Shane should break 630 after 512 attempts. The only remaining questions are whether his average might actually be higher than 70 and whether he will attempt it enough times.