Maybe I just don't understand. If someone chooses to gamble then that is just what they are doing.. gambling. This means that they can come out ahead or not.
I think that the only reason that someone would need to know ahead of time is so that they could adjust their speed to give someone some matches and then clean them out. I would think that if someone chose to play their best and give an even match then 1 set or 100 wouldn't matter.
Maybe people who gamble risking money that hurts to lose are upset when someone walks away but I would think that it could as easily be chalked up to losing.. you know.. that thing that might happen when you gamble? Losing is a risk of doing business for anyone who gambles. If the winner had to stay until things are even then what is the point of the whole exercise - just to keep going back and forth until someone is cleaned out?
I love to play and will gamble on occasion but I don't get the part of pool culture that is sympathetic to people who get taken while trying to fool someone else into thinking they have a chance and then cleaning them out.
Psssh... You... with your logic.
I concur